Abstract
The transition from the blocked to the superparamagnetic regime in non-interacting and frozen magnetite nanoparticles with diameters of about 10 nm was studied using the Monte Carlo method with the Metropolis algorithm. The behavior of the blocking temperature (T B) was analyzed for different nanoparticle systems. For ensembles of homogeneous nanoparticles, T B showed a linear dependence on the exchange constant, which is the main factor that determines T B. Comparatively, the dependence of T B on the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant was much weaker and nonlinear. It was observed that T B decreases with the decreasing particle size following a finite-size scaling theory. Systems of nanoparticles with a core/dead-layer structure exhibited a lower T B than the corresponding homogeneous nanoparticles. It was verified that the presence of a thin, hard layer on the nanoparticles surface, where the exchange interaction was improved, produced a significant increase in the blocking temperature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Als-Nielsen J, Dietricht OW, Kunnmann W, Passell L (1971) Critical Behavior of the Heisenberg Ferromagnets EuQ and EuS. Phys Rev Lett 27:741–744
Arantes FR, Figueiredo, Neto AM, Cornejo DR (2011) Magnetic behavior of 10 nm-magnetite particles diluted in lyotropic liquid crystals. J Appl Phys 109:07E315.1–07E315.3. doi:10.1063/1.3549616
Batlle X, Labarta A (2002) Finite-size effects in fine particles: magnetic and transport properties. J Phys D 35:R15–R42
Berger L, Labaye Y, Tamine M, Coey JMD (2008) Ferromagnetic nanoparticles with strong surface anisotropy: spin structures and magnetization processes. Phys Rev B 77:104431.1–104431.10. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.104431
Bertotti G (1998) Hysteresis in magnetism for physicists, materials scientists and engineers. Academic Press, San Diego
Chen K, Ferrenberg AM, Landau DP (1993) Static critical behavior of three-dimensional classical Heisenberg models: a high-resolution Monte Carlo study. Phys Rev B 48:3249–3256
Chen X, Sahoo S, Kleemann W, Cardoso S, Freitas PP (2004) Universal and scaled relaxation of interacting magnetic nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 70:172411.1–172411.4. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.172411
Daou TJ, Grenèche JM, Pourroy G, Buathong S, Derory A, Ulhaq-Bouillet C, Donnio B, Guillon D, Begin-Colin S (2008) Coupling agent effect on magnetic properties of functionalized magnetite-based nanoparticles. Chem Mater 20:5869–5875. doi:10.1021/cm801405n
Demortière A, Panissod P, Pichon BP, Pourroy G, Guillon D, Donnio B, Bégin-Colin S (2011) Size-dependent properties of magnetic iron oxide nanocrystals. Nanoscale 3:225–232. doi:10.1039/c0nr00521e
Hergt R, Dutz S, Müller R, Zeisberger M (2006) Magnetic particle hyperthermia: nanoparticle magnetism and materials development for cancer therapy. J Phys 18:S2919–S2934. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/S26
Iglesias O, Labarta A (2001) Finite-size and surface effects in maghemite nanoparticles: Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Rev B 63:184416.1–184416.11. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184416
Iglesias O, Labarta A (2005) Influence of surface anisotropy on the hysteresis of magnetic nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 290:738–741. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.358
Kesserwan H, Manfredi G, Bigot J-Y, Hervieux P-A (2011) Magnetization reversal in isolated and interacting single-domain nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 84:172407.1–172407.5
Kittel C (1995) Introduction to solid state physics, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
Kodama RH (1999) Magnetic nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 200:359–372
Landau DP (1976) Finite-size behavior of the simple-cubic Ising lattice. Phys Rev B 14:255–262
Landau DP, Binder K (2000) A guide to Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Leblanc MD, Plumer ML, Whitehead JP, Mercer JI (2010) Transition temperature and magnetic properties of the granular Ising model in two dimensions studied by Monte Carlo simulations: impact of intragrain spin structure. Phys Rev B 82:174435.1–174435.8. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174435
Leite VS, Figueiredo W (2006) Mean-field and Monte Carlo calculations of the equilibrium magnetic properties of uniaxial ferromagnetic particles. Phys Lett A 359:300–307. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.06.039
Leostean C, Pana O, Turcu R, Soran ML, Macavei S, Chauvet O, Payen C (2011) Comparative study of core–shell iron/iron oxide gold covered magnetic nanoparticles obtained in different conditions. J Nanopart Res 13:6181–6192. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0313-3
Lu A-H, Salabas EL, Schüth F (2007) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int 46:1222–1244. doi:10.1002/anie.200602866
Mao Z, Chen X (2010) Magnetic relaxation in disordered exchange interacting systems with random anisotropy. Solid State Commun 150:2227–2230. doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2010.09.038
Mejía-López J, Mazo-Zuluaga J (2011) Energy contributions in magnetite nanoparticles: computation of magnetic phase diagram, theory, and simulation. J Nanopart Res 13:7115–7125. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0629-z
Metropolis N, Ulam S (1949) The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 44:335–341. doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310
Neuberger T, Schöpf B, Hofmann H, Hofmann M, von Rechenberg B (2005) Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications: possibilities and limitations of a new drug delivery system. J Magn Magn Mater 293:483–495. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.064
Nie Z, Petukhova A, Kumacheva E (2010) Properties and emerging applications of self-assembled structures made from inorganic nanoparticles. Nat Nanotech 5:15–25. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.453
Peczak P, Ferrenberg AM, Landau DP (1991) High-accuracy Monte Carlo study of the three-dimensional classical Heisenberg ferromagnet. Phys Rev B 43:6087–6093
Porto M (2002a) Effect of positional disorder in systems of ultrafine ferromagnetic particles. Eur Phys J B 26:229–234. doi:10.1140/epjb/e20020084
Porto M (2002b) Relative significance of particle anisotropy in systems of ultrafine ferromagnetic particles. J Appl Phys 92:6057–6061. doi:10.1063/1.1513873
Porto M (2005) Ordered systems of ultrafine ferromagnetic particles. Eur Phys J B 45:369–375. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2005-00186-3
Reiss G, Hütten A (2005) Magnetic nanoparticles: applications beyond data storage. Nat Mater 4:725–726
Russ S, Bunde A (2011) Relaxation in ordered systems of ultrafine magnetic particles: effect of the exchange interaction. J Phys 23:126001.1–1260011. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/23/12/126001
Sato T, Iijima T, Seki M, Inagaki N (1987) Magnetic properties of ultrafine ferrite particles. J Magn Magn Mater 65:252–256
Serantes D, Baldomir D, Pereiro M, Arias JE, Mateo–Mateo C, Buján-Núñez MC, Vázquez-Vázquez C, Rivas J (2008) Interplay between the magnetic field and the dipolar interaction on a magnetic nanoparticle system: a Monte Carlo study. J Non-Cryst Solids 354:5224–5226. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.040
Serantes D, Baldomir D, Pereiro M, Hoppe CE, Rivadulla F, Rivas J (2010) Nonmonotonic evolution of the blocking temperature in dispersions of superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 82:134433.1–134433.6. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.134433
Skumryev V, Stoyanov S, Zhang Y, Hadjipanayis G, Givord D, Nogués J (2003) Beating the superparamagnetic limit with exchange bias. Nature 423:850–853
Srivastava CM, Srinivasan G, Nanadikar NG (1979) Exchange constants in spinel ferrites. Phys Rev B 19:499–508
Stanley HE (1999) Scaling, universality, and renormalization: three pillars of modern critical phenomena. Rev Mod Phys 71:S358–S366
Yang HT, Liu HL, Song NN, Du HF, Zhang XQ, Cheng ZH, Shen J, Li LF (2011) Determination of the critical interspacing for the noninteracting magnetic nanoparticle system. Appl Phys Lett 98:153112.1–153112.3. doi:10.1063/1.3574917
Acknowledgments
The authors thank FAPESP—the São Paulo Research Foundation—for funding this research through processes numbered 2010/01655-2 and 2012/07117-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arantes, F.R., Cornejo, D.R. Monte Carlo study of the magnetic properties of frozen and non-interacting nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 15, 1859 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1859-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1859-z