Skip to main content
Log in

Scopeless quantity words in Shona

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Shona (Bantu, Zimbabwe), bare plurals and bare singulars seem to have different scope possibilities with respect to a class of modifiers which I term “scopeless quantity words” (including numerals, shoma ‘(a) few’, and ose ‘all’). I argue that this is due to two factors. First, the scopeless quantity words are intersective modifiers rather than quantifying determiners, so that DPs containing them denote entities rather than generalised quantifiers. Second, transitive sentences involving plural arguments are usually interpreted using the **-operator, which gives a cumulative reading; the apparent wide and narrow scope readings of bare plurals are both subcases of this reading, but a narrow scope reading for bare singulars cannot be subsumed by the cumulative reading. I also discuss the scope behaviour of a quantifying determiner, oga-oga ‘every’, which shows a subject/object asymmetry: in subject position, it appears to show the expected scopal ambiguity, but in object position, it appears to have the same readings as a scopeless quantity word; I argue that this is because of the location of existential closure. This adds to the evidence suggesting that many words giving quantity are intersective modifiers rather than quantifying determiners or adverbial quantifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abusch Dorit. (1994) The scope of indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 2: 83–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck Sigrid, Uli Sauerland (2000) Cumulation is needed: A reply to Winter (2000). Natural Language Semantics 8: 349–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, Heather, and Dennis Ryan Storoshenko. 2008. Passivization and A’-movement in Shona. In Proceedings of the 2008 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. Susie Jones. http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~cla-acl/actes2008/CLA2008_Bliss_Storoshenko.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2009.

  • Brisson, Christine. 1998. Distributivity, maximality, and floating quantifiers. PhD dissertation, Rutgers.

  • Brisson Christine. (2003) Plurals, ‘all’, and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 129–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg. 2003. Weak indefinites. In From NP to DP, Vol. 1: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases, ed. Martine Coene and Yves D’hulst, 195–210. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Carpenter, Bob. 1994. Distribution, collection and quantification: A type-logical account of plurality. http://www.colloquial.com/carp/Publications/plurals.ps. Accessed 16 July 2009.

  • Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Rint Sybesma. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 509–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra, and William A. Ladusaw. 2003. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Corbett, Greville G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creissels, Denis, and Stéphane Robert. 1998. Morphologie verbale et organisation discursive de l’énoncé: le cas du tswana et du wolof. Faits de langues 6(11): 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresti, Diana. 1995. Indefinite topics. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Cruse, D.A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuth, Katherine, and Carolyn Harford. 1999. Verb raising and subject inversion in Bantu relatives. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 20: 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David. 1987. Collective predicates, distributive predicates, and all. In Proceedings of the 3rd Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. Fred Marshall, 96–115. Columbus: Ohio State University.

  • Ferch, Elizabeth. 2009. Number and the scope of indefinites. Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia.

  • Ferch, Elizabeth. 2010. The scope of negation in Shona. In Proceedings of NWLC 2009, ed. Heather Bliss, Meagan Louie, and Murray Schellenberg, 75–85. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Fodor, Janet Dean, and Ivan A. Sag. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–398.

  • Fortune George. (1981) Shona grammatical constructions. Mercury Press: Harare, Zimbabwe

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil David. (1982) Quantifier scope, linguistic variation, and natural language semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 421–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, Carrie Samantha. 2006. The semantics of determiners: Domain restriction in Sḵwx̱ú7mesh. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.

  • Gundel, Jeanette K., and Thorstein Fretheim. 2004. Topic and focus. In The handbook of pragmatics, ed. Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 174–196. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Hawkins John A. (1991) On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27: 405–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Heim, Irene. 1991. Articles and definiteness. Published in German as “Artikel und Definitheit”. In Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Ionin, Tania, and Ora Matushansky. 2004. A singular plural. In WCFFL 23: Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. Benjamin Schmeiser, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, and Angelo Rodriguez, 101–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1986. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen, und Aspektklassen. PhD dissertation, Universität München. Cited in Beck and Sauerland 2000.

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1996 Parametrized sum individuals for plural anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 555–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view, ed. Ken Turner, 257–291. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

  • Landman, Fred. 2000. Events and plurality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Landman, Fred. 2003. Predicate-argument mismatches and the Adjectival Theory of indefinites. In From NP to DP, Vol. 1: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases, ed. Martine Coene and Yves D’hulst, 211–237. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Lasersohn Peter. (1998) Generalized distributivity operators. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, ed. Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, 302–323. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Link, Godehard. 1987. Generalized quantifiers and plurals. In Generalized quantifiers, ed. Peter Gärdenfors, 151–180. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Löbner Sebastian. (2000) Polarity in natural language: predication, quantification and negation in particular and characterizing sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 213–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson Lisa. (1999) On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 7: 79–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson Lisa. (2001) Quantification and the nature of cross-linguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 9: 145–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H. 1986. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh, and Martin Stokhof, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Partee, Barbara H. 1989. Many quantifiers. In Proceedings of the 5th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. Joyce Powers and Kenneth de Jong, 383–402. Columbus: Ohio State University.

  • Portner, Paul, and Katsuhiko Yabushita. 2001. Specific indefinites and the information structure theory of topics. Journal of Semantics 18: 271–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart Tanya. (1997) Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 335–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, Uli. 2003. A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIII, ed. Rob Young and Yuping Zhou, 258–275. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Sauerland, Uli, Jan Anderssen, and Kazuko Yatsushiro. 2005. The plural is semantically unmarked. In Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives, ed. Stephan Kepser and Marga Reis, 413–434. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Scha, Remko. 1981. Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. In Formal methods in the study of language, ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M.V. Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, 483–512. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.

  • Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 1996. Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Spector, Benjamin. 2007. Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, ed. Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva, 243–281. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Stanley, Jason and Zoltán Gendle Szabó. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language 15:219–261

  • Sternefeld Wolfgang. (1998) Reciprocity and cumulative predication. Natural Language Semantics 6: 303–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Winter Yoad. (1997) Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 399–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, Eytan. 2009. Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s10988-009-9064-3.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Ferch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferch, E. Scopeless quantity words in Shona. Nat Lang Semantics 21, 373–400 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-013-9097-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-013-9097-6

Keywords

Navigation