Abstract
This paper claims that indefinite descriptions, singular and plural, have different scope properties than genuine quantifiers. This claim is based on their distinct behavior in island constructions: while indefinites in islands can have intermediate (and maximal) scope readings, quantifiers cannot. Further, the simplest in situ interpretation strategy for indefinites results in incorrect truth conditions for intermediate (and maximal) scope readings. I introduce a mechanism which “auto-matically” preserves the restriction on free variables corresponding to indefinites, in a way which allows the restriction to be carried up in the course of semantic interpretation and to be used at the level where the variable is quantified. This mechanism is a realization of the “indefinites-as-free-variables” proposal of Lewis, Kamp, and Heim, but emphasizes the role of the restriction. I then show that distributive readings of plural indefinites also display island-escaping behavior and argue for an independent, island-insensitive distribution mechanism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chierchia, Gennaro: 1992, ‘Anaphora and Dynamic Binding’,Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 111–183.
Cresswell, Max and Arnim von Stechow: 1982, ‘De Re Belief Generalized’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 503–535.
Cresswell, Max: 1985,Structured Meanings: The Semantics of Propositional Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Enç, Murvet: 1986, ‘Towards a Referential Analysis of Temporal Expressions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 405–426.
Fodor, Janet and Ivan Sag: 1982, ‘Referential and Quantificational Indefinites’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355–398.
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.
Heim, Irene: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim, Irene: 1987, ‘Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply? Evidence from the Definiteness of Variables’, in A. G. B. ter Meulen and E. J. Reuland (eds.),The Representation of (In)definiteness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21–42.
Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik and Robert May: 1988, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–102.
Hirschbühler, Paul: 1982, ‘VP Deletion and Across-the-Board Quantifier Scope’,Proceedings of NELS 12, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jacobs, Joachim: 1983,Fokus and Skalen, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
Kamp, Hans: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Part 1, Mathematical Centre, Tract 135, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322.
Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters: 1979, ‘Conventional Implicature’, in Ch. K. Oh and P. A. Dinneen (eds.),Syntax and Semantics Vol. 11: Presupposition, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–56.
King, Jeffrey: 1988, ‘Are Indefinite Descriptions Ambiguous?’,Philosophical Studies 53, 417–440.
Krifka, Manfred: 1988, ‘The Relational Theory of Generity’, in M. Krifka (ed.),Genericity in Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1988 Tübingen Conference, SNS-Bericht 88-42, Tübingen University, pp. 284–312.
Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. R. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 303–323.
Ludlow, Peter and Steven Neale: 1991, ‘Indefinite Descriptions: In Defence of Russell’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 171–202.
Milsark, Gary: 1974,Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Quine, Willard V. O.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’,Journal of Philosophy 53, 183–194.
Reinhart, Tanya: 1991, ‘Interpreting wh-in-situ’, talk given in IMS Stuttgart, December 1991.
Rooth, Mats: to appear, ‘Indefinites, Adverb of Quantification and Focus Semantics’, in G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.),The Generic Book, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Ruys, Eduard: 1992,The Scope of Indefinites, Ph.D. dissertation, OTS, Utrecht.
Sag, Ivan: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
van der Sandt, Rob A.: 1992, ‘Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution’,Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377.
von Stechow, Arnim: 1989,Focusing and Backgrounding Operators, Arbeitspapier Nr. 6 der Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.
von Stechow, Arnim: 1991, ‘Current Issues in the Theory of Focus’, A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.),Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 804–825.
Williams, Edwin: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’,Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abusch, D. The scope of indefinites. Nat Lang Seman 2, 83–135 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250400
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250400