Skip to main content
Log in

DRT with local contexts

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 August 2011

Abstract

In this note, we reconstruct some results of the DRT analysis of presupposition projection within the theory of local contexts of Schlenker (2009). The latter offered a way to annotate every sentence with variables that denote the various local context sets that play a crucial role in Heim’s satisfaction theory (Heim 1983). In standard satisfaction theories, a presupposition must be entailed by its local context. Here we allow a presupposition to be indexed with other local contexts, and we propose, following van der Sandt (1992) and Zeevat (1992), that presuppositions are preferably anaphoric to the highest possible context. The resulting analysis emulates some desirable results of DRT—notably its solution to the ‘Proviso Problem’ (Geurts 1999). But it arguably improves on DRT in some respects: it can generate genuine conditional presuppositions; and it yields more adequate results for some quantified examples. Several limitations of the theory—some of them quite severe—are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaver David (2001) Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, David, and Henk Zeevat. 2007. Accommodation. In Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. G. Ramchand and C. Reiss, 503–538. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chemla Emmanuel (2009) Presuppositions of quantified sentences: Experimental data. Natural Language Semantics 17(4): 299–340. doi:10.1007/s11050-009-9043-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemla, Emmanuel, and Philippe Schlenker. 2011a. Incremental vs. symmetric accounts of presupposition projection: an experimental approach. Manuscript, LSCP and Institut Jean-Nicod.

  • Chemla, Emmanuel, and Philippe Schlenker. 2011b. The reality of conditional presuppositions. Manuscript, LSCP and Institut Jean-Nicod.

  • Geurts Bart (1996) Local satisfaction guaranteed: A presupposition theory and its problems. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts Bart (1999) Presupposition and pronouns. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. D. Flickinger, et al., 114–125. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Heim, Irene: 1991, Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantik/Semantics. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, ed. Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, 487–536. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Heim Irene (1992) Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9(3): 183–221. doi:10.1093/jos/9.3.183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Formal methods in the study of language, ed. J. Groenendijk et al. Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.

  • Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan, ed. P. Almog and H. Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Landau Idan (2001) Elements of control: structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, Philippe. 2009. Local contexts. Semantics & Pragmatics 2, Art. 3: 1-78, doi:10.3765/sp.2.3.

  • Schlenker, Philippe. to appear. The Proviso Problem: a note. Natural Language Semantics.

  • Soames, Scott. 1989. Presupposition. In Handbook of philosophical logic 4, ed. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, 553–616. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Singh, Raj. 2007. Formal alternatives as a solution to the Proviso Problem. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 2007, ed. M. Gibson and T. Friedman, 264–228. Ithaca, N.Y.: CLC Publications.

  • van der Sandt Rob (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9(4): 333–377. doi:10.1093/jos/9.4.333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeevat Henk. (1992) Presupposition and accommodation in Update Semantics. Journal of Semantics 9: 379–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Schlenker.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9078-6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlenker, P. DRT with local contexts. Nat Lang Semantics 19, 373–392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9069-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9069-7

Keywords

Navigation