Abstract
In this note, we reconstruct some results of the DRT analysis of presupposition projection within the theory of local contexts of Schlenker (2009). The latter offered a way to annotate every sentence with variables that denote the various local context sets that play a crucial role in Heim’s satisfaction theory (Heim 1983). In standard satisfaction theories, a presupposition must be entailed by its local context. Here we allow a presupposition to be indexed with other local contexts, and we propose, following van der Sandt (1992) and Zeevat (1992), that presuppositions are preferably anaphoric to the highest possible context. The resulting analysis emulates some desirable results of DRT—notably its solution to the ‘Proviso Problem’ (Geurts 1999). But it arguably improves on DRT in some respects: it can generate genuine conditional presuppositions; and it yields more adequate results for some quantified examples. Several limitations of the theory—some of them quite severe—are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beaver David (2001) Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford
Beaver, David, and Henk Zeevat. 2007. Accommodation. In Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. G. Ramchand and C. Reiss, 503–538. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chemla Emmanuel (2009) Presuppositions of quantified sentences: Experimental data. Natural Language Semantics 17(4): 299–340. doi:10.1007/s11050-009-9043-9.
Chemla, Emmanuel, and Philippe Schlenker. 2011a. Incremental vs. symmetric accounts of presupposition projection: an experimental approach. Manuscript, LSCP and Institut Jean-Nicod.
Chemla, Emmanuel, and Philippe Schlenker. 2011b. The reality of conditional presuppositions. Manuscript, LSCP and Institut Jean-Nicod.
Geurts Bart (1996) Local satisfaction guaranteed: A presupposition theory and its problems. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 259–294
Geurts Bart (1999) Presupposition and pronouns. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. D. Flickinger, et al., 114–125. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Heim, Irene: 1991, Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantik/Semantics. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, ed. Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, 487–536. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Heim Irene (1992) Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9(3): 183–221. doi:10.1093/jos/9.3.183.
Kamp, Hans. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Formal methods in the study of language, ed. J. Groenendijk et al. Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan, ed. P. Almog and H. Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Landau Idan (2001) Elements of control: structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Springer, Heidelberg
Schlenker, Philippe. 2009. Local contexts. Semantics & Pragmatics 2, Art. 3: 1-78, doi:10.3765/sp.2.3.
Schlenker, Philippe. to appear. The Proviso Problem: a note. Natural Language Semantics.
Soames, Scott. 1989. Presupposition. In Handbook of philosophical logic 4, ed. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, 553–616. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Singh, Raj. 2007. Formal alternatives as a solution to the Proviso Problem. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 2007, ed. M. Gibson and T. Friedman, 264–228. Ithaca, N.Y.: CLC Publications.
van der Sandt Rob (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9(4): 333–377. doi:10.1093/jos/9.4.333.
Zeevat Henk. (1992) Presupposition and accommodation in Update Semantics. Journal of Semantics 9: 379–412
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9078-6
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlenker, P. DRT with local contexts. Nat Lang Semantics 19, 373–392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9069-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9069-7