Abstract
The phenomenon of inverse linking, where a noun phrase embedded within another behaves with respect to binding as though it were structurally independent, has proven challenging for theories of the syntax–semantics interface. In this paper I show that, using an LF-movement style approach to the syntax–semantics interface, we can derive all and only the appropriate meanings for such constructions using no semantic operations other than function application and composition. The solution relies neither on a proliferation of lexical ambiguity nor on abandoning the idea that pronouns denote variables, but rather on a straightforward (and standard) reification of assignment functions, which allows us to define abstraction operators within our models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker C. (2002) Continuations and the nature of quantification. Natural Language Semantics 10: 211–242
Büring, D. 2001. A situation semantics for binding out of DP. In Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory 11, ed. R. Hastings, B. Jackson, and Z. Zvolenski, 56–75. Ithaca, NY: CLC.
Büring D. (2004) Crossover situations. Natural Language Semantics 12(1): 23–62
Cooper R. (1983) Quantification and syntactic theory. Reidel, Dordrecht
Elbourne, P. 2002. Situations and individuals. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. (1991) Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 39–100
Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Malden
Keenan E.L., Faltz L.M. (1985) Boolean semantics for natural language. Reidel, Dordrecht
Keller, W.R. 1988. Nested cooper storage: the proper treatment of quantification in ordinary noun phrases. In Natural language parsing and linguistic theories. Number 35 in Studies in linguistics and philosophy, ed. U. Reyle and C. Rohrer, 432–447. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Klein E., Sag I.A. (1985) Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 163–201
Kobele, G.M. 2006. Generating copies: An investigation into structural identity in language and grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Landman, M. 2005. Variables in natural language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Larson, R.K. 1985. Quantifying into NP. Manuscript, SUNY Stony Brook.
May, R. 1977. The grammar of quantification. PhD dissertation, MIT.
May R. (1985) Logical form: Its structure and derivation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
May, R. and A. Bale. 2005. Inverse linking. In The blackwell companion to syntax, ed. M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, Vol. 2, 639–667. Oxford: Blackwell.
Montague R. (1970) Universal grammar. Theoria 36(3): 373–398
Montague, R. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary english. In Approaches to natural language, ed. J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes, 221–242. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Montague, R. 1974. English as a formal language. In Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, 188–221. New Haven: Yale University Press (edited and with an introduction by R. H. Thomason).
Sauerland, U. 2005. DP is not a scope island. Linguistic Inquiry 36 (2): 303–314.
Sternefeld, W. 1997. The semantics of reconstruction and connectivity. In Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340 97, 1–58. University of Tübingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kobele, G.M. Inverse linking via function composition. Nat Lang Semantics 18, 183–196 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-009-9053-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-009-9053-7