Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Tonal reflexes of movement in Asante Twi

  • 165 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

We argue that Asante Twi has a process of tonal overwriting on verbs that are crossed by an A’-dependency. It is shown that this view captures the distribution of the process across ex-situ focus constructions, relative clauses and adverbial clauses, which are all contexts involving operator movement. Furthermore, we illustrate that this process is unbounded and applies to each verb in a long-distance dependency. We therefore conclude that this is a reflex of successive-cyclic movement through vP. Additionally, we provide a detailed study of resumption in Asante Twi, showing that despite island-insensitivity, resumption is still derived by movement. Finally, the morpho-phonological side of the phenomenon is investigated. It is shown that overwriting affects only those affixes below v and not those above, which follows from cyclic Vocabulary Insertion. This provides support for Kandybowicz’ (2017) assumption that aspect and negation are lower than vP in Asante Twi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    All non-cited data come from the first co-author of the paper, who is a native speaker of Akan and has native intuitions about the Asante Twi and Fante dialects. Crucial judgments have been cross-checked with other native speakers of the Asante Twi dialect. High tones are marked with an acute accent (e.g. á) and low tones are generally unmarked (but sometimes with a grave accent à). Downstepped high tones are marked with a superscript exclamation mark (!). Note that we focus on Asante Twi in particular here since other dialects of Akan (such as Fante) exhibit tonal polarity where the corresponding low-toned habitual verb stems in Asante Twi actually surface with high tones even in discourse-neutral contexts (see Abakah 2005:123ff.). While Akan has a rich array of segmental phonological processes such as assimilation (Schachter 1969) and ATR harmony (Casali 2012; Kügler 2015), we follow standard Akan orthography and do not represent such processes graphemically, unless immediately relevant.

  2. 2.

    Note that this process is not limited to extraction of arguments. Tonal overwriting is also found with extraction of adjuncts such as dabέn (‘when’) (11b) and Ɛhéńfá (‘where’) (11d).

    1. (i)
      figureg
  3. 3.

    It is worth noting that there are other kinds of tonal overwriting in Asante Twi. For example, Dolphyne (1988) discusses high-tone spreading in associative constructions, and Paster (2010) discusses low tone overwriting in the imperative (see Sect. 4.1). Certain kinds of prefixes also trigger tonal alternations on verb roots (Schachter and Fromkin 1968; Paster 2010) (see Sect. 4.2). As far as we can tell, these processes are fully independent of the particular kind of high-tone overwriting described here.

  4. 4.

    It was originally suggested that only transitive vP (i.e. v*P) was a phase. However, subsequent work argued that unaccusative and passive vP should also constitute phases (see e.g. Legate 2003; Sauerland 2003).

  5. 5.

    It is important to note however that this is only straightforward for transparent reflexes which occur uniformly along the extraction path (what Georgi 2014 calls Pattern I reflexes). As Georgi (2014, 2017) discusses, there are also patterns which mark exclusively final or non-final movement steps, which can motivate treating the reflex as a realization of Spec-Head wh-agreement.

  6. 6.

    There is an additional complementizer aN (triggering nasalization of the following segment) that occurs with resumptive dependencies (34).

    1. (i)
      figuret

    McCloskey argues that this results from a base-generated pro in Spec-CP that binds the resumptive pronoun í directly. Thus, no movement is involved in an example such as (33). Thus, we would have to refine the Vocabulary Items in (34) to involve an OP(erator) feature, as McCloskey (2002) suggests. Such cases are not relevant for the Asante Twi data. Although Asante Twi has overt resumptives with animates, they behave exactly like gaps do, and also show movement effects (see Sect. 3).

  7. 7.

    Titov (2019:29f.) follows Boadi (1974) and Ofori (2011) in assuming that na-focus constructions are actually bi-clausal structures, where the focus particle na is the result of phonological fusion of the copula ne and the relative marker áa. In particular, Titov (2019) treats this as an underlying inverse pseudocleft with fusion of ne and áa (35).

    1. (i)
      figureu

    This is not a plausible synchronic analysis for the na-construction, however, since free/headless relative clauses in Asante Twi do not take the áa relative marker, but rather the topic marker déέ (35) (Boadi 2005:155ff.).

    1. (ii)
      figurev

    Furthermore, despite some similarities between focus constructions and relative clauses (e.g. regarding tone), there are also surface differences such as the distribution of the clausal determiner (cd). While the CD is obligatory with relative clauses (Saah 2010:100), it is typically optional in na-focus constructions. This difference would be unexpected if they shared the same underlying source.

  8. 8.

    It is important to note that this is not simply an effect of ‘clause-finality,’ since structurally higher clause-final material, such as the question particle anaa, does not license an inanimate pronoun (49b) (also see Korsah 2017:27f.).

    1. (i)
      figuread

    Furthermore, adding a pause before the adverb in examples such as (48a) and (49b) leads to the disappearance of the pronoun. As a reviewer suggests, this may highlight the role of prosodic phrasing, i.e. pro-drop applies when the pronoun is final in its intonation phrase (see Reglero 2007 on with wh-in-situ in Spanish). Furthermore, the special intonation of the yes-no question in (48b) may also have a similar effect (as also noted by the reviewer).

  9. 9.

    Titov (2019) disputes the existence of WCO in Akan. This is not too surprising, since WCO is known to be a somewhat fragile diagnostic, subject to inter-speaker variation (see e.g. Salzmann 2017b:197). Regarding WCO with resumptives in Swedish, Asudeh (2012:245) notes that ‘as is common with weak crossover judgments, there is some speaker uncertainty and variation here. For some speakers, the judgments are quite robust, though.’ (also see Baker and Kramer 2018:1045 on WCO variation in Amharic). As far we can tell, the situation is similar in Asante Twi, with some speakers having robust sensitivity to WCO. Speakers without WCO might be employing a logophoric strategy, or treating the possessor as the resumptive (i.e. Left-Branch Extraction). Examples such as (64b) become relevant in this regard because epithets do not function as resumptives in Asante Twi and are generally assumed to be anti-logophoric (e.g. Dubinsky and Hamilton 1998).

  10. 10.

    A reviewer points out an interesting example in which a -construction is embedded under a focus construction. Here, we still observe tonal overwriting on the verb (76).

    1. (i)
      figurebc

    While we cannot investigate this construction in detail, there are a number of potential analyses that would be consistent with our proposal. One such analysis is that the subject simply moves across a base-generated topic pronoun. The alternative would be to assume that a moving phrase can exceptionally stop at Spec-Top (and trigger resumption) en route to its final landing site (however, we might expect to find a D-linked interpretation). For now, we leave such examples for further investigation in future research.

  11. 11.

    An anonymous reviewer provides the following example in which the idiomatic reading of the idiom ka ne mpaboa so (‘to polish one’s shoe’), i.e. ‘to be drunk,’ is also possible in the déέ-construction (78b).

    1. (i)
      figurebf

    If there are certain idiom chunks that license idiomatic readings even under base-generation, this is not necessarily fatal for our analysis, since idioms are known to vary with regard to their ‘transparency,’ i.e. their ability to participate in syntactic dependencies (see e.g. Fraser 1970; Nunberg et al. 1994). Thus, some idioms, such as the one in (77), could be able to control the (null) pronoun in a base-generation structure, whereas others cannot and would therefore require reconstruction to derive an idiomatic interpretation.

  12. 12.

    There are a couple of, still poorly understood, exceptions to this basic picture. As discussed by Korsah (2017:111), speakers allow for optional Ɛ-marking on the verb with animate subjects in some restricted contexts. These include serial verb constructions and with subjects of intransitive verbs (79a). Importantly, this option requires an overt DP subject and is not possible under pro drop (79b). We leave further investigation of these exceptions to future research.

    1. (i)
      figurebh
  13. 13.

    This can be thought of as analogous to the LF process of Trace Conversion (Fox 1999, 2002). It is also conceivable that Pronoun Conversion is the PF equivalent of vehicle change (Fiengo and May 1994), where an R-expression can be construed as a coreferent pronoun at LF. Importantly, vehicle change has also been claimed to apply to traces in movement chains (Giannakidou and Merchant 1998; Safir 1999; Hunter and Yoshida 2016). It could also be viewed as the same process as with island-sensitive resumptives, e.g. deletion (van Urk 2018) or m-Merger (Harizanov 2014), but with variation in the timing of when island constraints are evaluated. Crucially, Pronoun Conversion must apply before, and therefore feed satisfaction of, island constraints. In island-sensitive languages, the Pronoun Conversion process applies too late (counter-feeding).

  14. 14.

    It seems that extrinsic ordering of Pronoun Conversion must be assumed in Asante Twi with regard to pro drop. Since island violations are still obviated by pro-dropped resumptives, we must assume that PF-islandhood is checked after Pronoun Conversion, but before pro drop applies (thanks to Ivy Sichel for pointing this out).

  15. 15.

    Although these affixes are cognates of the verbs for ‘come’ and ‘go,’ it is not possible to analyze them (synchronically) as serial verb constructions. In serial verb constructions, both verbs typically inflect for tense/aspect/agreement (see Hellan et al. 2003). In some aspects, the second verb in an SVC bears ‘infinitive’ or ‘consecutive’ marking as with in (97), which makes it distinct from its grammaticalized use as an aspectual prefix.

    1. (i)
      figurebw
  16. 16.

    Note that, in (101), although past tense is a floating mora (Ofori 2006; Paster 2010), Akan does not allow heavy syllables (*CVC, *CVV). Long vowels and final nasals are associated with separate syllables (Dolphyne 1988:52ff.). We assume that the additional syllable node is inserted as a repair to a constraint militating against bi-moraic syllables. Also, Kügler (2015) shows that there are some limited cases of ATR-harmony across words in Akan, however they only include regressive harmony between a sequence of [−ATR]-[+ATR] and only within a phonological phrase (φ). We therefore do not believe that such exceptions fundamentally undermine the applicability of this diagnostic.

  17. 17.

    We assume that the H tones belonging to the circumfix cannot be deleted due to a high-ranked constraint on morpheme realization (e.g. RealizeMorpheme; Kurisu 2001).

  18. 18.

    We diverge from Kandybowicz (2015) by continuing to represent the morpheme as , following standard Akan orthography.

  19. 19.

    This presupposes that the Head Movement Constraint cannot be absolute, but rather relativized for certain heads, see Baker and Collins (2006:313) for a similar assumption. Kandybowicz (2015) provides further evidence for V-to-T movement from the periphrastic expression of past tense with na, which will not be discussed here.

  20. 20.

    Furthermore, motion aspect seems to occur even lower than negation (and in conjunction with other aspects) (114) (also see Boadi 2008:14), suggesting it occupies another aspect head even lower than negation (e.g. Mot0; Kusmer 2011:18).

    1. (i)
      figurece

    This aspectual marker does not block movement to T, since it is compatible with the -V past marker (97).

  21. 21.

    An anonymous reviewer points out that this problem might speak in favour of a different mechanism of successive-cyclic movement. For example, Bošković (2014, 2016) assumes that the entire phase (including the edge) is sent to Spell-Out (also see Harwood 2015). Bošković (2016) argues that in such an approach, successive-cyclic movement targets the phrase immediately dominating the phase. This would mean that subjects would also have to move from their base-position inside the phase. A potential drawback of this kind of non-feature-driven approach to successive-cyclic movement comes in accounting for the morphological reflexes at hand. Although Bošković (2008) suggests that some of these data could be reanalyzed as intervention effects, feature-driven approaches offer the most straightforward way of accounting for them, as they can tie allomorphic alternations to the presence of a movement-related feature. Furthermore, Georgi (2014, 2017) shows that they can also handle ‘opaque’ patterns, which seem more problematic for featureless, ‘Greed’-based analyses.

  22. 22.

    Also, (125a) shows that this morpheme occurs with progressive aspect re-, unlike (111b).

  23. 23.

    Indeed, a reviewer points out that the restrictions on wh-in-situ in Asante Twi seems to mirror those described for French (see Bošković 1998 and Cheng and Rooryck 2000 for arguments for a feature movement approach).

References

  1. Abakah, Emmanuel N. 2005. Tone rules in Akan. Journal of West African Languages 32 (1–2): 109–134.

  2. Abakah, Emmanuel N. 2010. Tone and the associative construction in Akan. Journal of West African Languages 37 (2): 57–79.

  3. Ackerman, Lauren, Michael Frazier, and Masaya Yoshida. 2018. Resumptive pronouns can ameliorate illicit island extractions. Linguistic Inquiry 49 (4): 847–859.

  4. Adger, David. 2007. Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33 (3–4): 238–266.

  5. Adger, David, and Gillian Ramchand. 2005. Merge and move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 36 (2): 161–193.

  6. Agüero-Bautista, Calixto. 2001. Cyclicity and the scope of wh-phrases. PhD diss., MIT.

  7. Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 1996. Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics 32 (2): 239–289.

  8. Alexiadou, Artemis, Paul Law, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder. 2000. Introduction. In The syntax of relative clauses, eds. Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder, 1–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  9. Alexopoulou, Theodora. 2006. Resumption in relative clauses. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24 (1): 57–111.

  10. Amaechi, Mary, and Doreen Georgi. 2019. Quirks of subject (non-)extraction in Igbo. Glossa 4 (1): 69–136.

  11. Ameka, Felix K. 1992. Focus constructions in Ewe and Akan: A comparative perspective. In Kwa comparative syntax workshop, eds. Chris Collins and Victor Manfredi, 1–25. Cambridge: MITWPIL.

  12. Ameka, Felix K. 2010. Information packaging constructions in Kwa: Microvariation and typology. In Topics in Kwa syntax, eds. Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, 141–176. Dordrecht: Springer.

  13. Amfo, Nana Aba Appiah. 2010. Lexical signaling of information structure in Akan. Linguistics 48 (1): 195–225.

  14. Aoun, Joseph, and Elabbas Benmamoun. 1998. Minimality, reconstruction and PF movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29 (4): 569–597.

  15. Aoun, Joseph, Lina Choueiri, and Norbert Hornstein. 2001. Resumption, movement and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (3): 371–403.

  16. Arkoh, Ruby, and Lisa Matthewson. 2013. A familiar definite article in Akan. Lingua 123: 1–30.

  17. Asudeh, Ash. 2012. The logic of pronominal resumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  18. Baier, Nico. 2014. Spell-out, chains, and long distance Wh-movement in Seereer. Ms. University of California, Berkeley.

  19. Baier, Nico. 2017. Antilocality and antiagreement. Linguistic Inquiry 48 (2): 367–377.

  20. Baier, Nico. 2018. Anti-agreement. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.

  21. Baker, Mark, and Ruth Kramer. 2018. Doubled clitics are pronouns: Amharic objects (and beyond). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36 (4): 1035–1088.

  22. Baker, Mark C. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16 (3): 373–415.

  23. Baker, Mark C., and Chris Collins. 2006. Linkers and the internal structure of vP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24 (2): 307–354.

  24. Baltin, Mark. 2012. Deletion versus pro-forms: An overly simple dichotomy? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30 (2): 381–423.

  25. Barss, Andrew. 1986. Chains and anaphoric dependence: On reconstruction and its implications. PhD diss., MIT.

  26. Bayer, Josef, and Martin Salzmann. 2013. That-trace effects and resumption—how improper movement can be repaired. In Repairs: The added value of being wrong, eds. Patrick Brandt and Eric Fuß, 275–333. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  27. Bayer, Josef, Jana Häussler, and Markus Bader. 2016. A new diagnostic for cyclic wh-movement: Discourse particles in German questions. Linguistic Inquiry 47 (4): 591–629.

  28. Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14 (1): 1–56.

  29. Beltrama, Andrea, and Ming Xiang. 2016. Unacceptable but comprehensible: The facilitation effect of resumptive pronouns. Glossa 1 (1): 29–124.

  30. Bennett, William G., Akinbiyi Akinlabi, and Bruce Connell. 2012. Two subject asymmetries in Defaka focus constructions. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 29, eds. Jaehoon Choi et al., 294–302. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  31. Bhatt, Rajesh. 2015. Relative clauses and correlatives. In Syntax – Theory and analysis: An international handbook, eds. Artemis Alexiadou and Tibor Kiss, 708–749. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  32. Boadi, Lawrence A. 1965. Some Twi phrase structure rules. Journal of West African Languages 2 (1): 37–46.

  33. Boadi, Lawrence A. 1971. The passive in Akan. Journal of African Languages 10 (3): 34–41.

  34. Boadi, Lawrence A. 1974. Focus marking in Akan. Linguistics 140: 5–57.

  35. Boadi, Lawrence A. 1990. Questions in Akan. Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 2: 70–92.

  36. Boadi, Lawrence A. 2005. Three major syntactic structures in Akan: Interrogatives, complementation and relativisation. Accra: Black Mask.

  37. Boadi, Lawrence A. 2008. Tense, aspect and mood in Akan. In Aspect and modality in Kwa languages, eds. Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, 9–68. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  38. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10, eds. Kleanthes K. Grohmann and Caro Struijke, 35–71. College Park: University of Maryland.

  39. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and “covert” movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20 (2): 197–267.

  40. Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Understanding Minimalist syntax: Lessons from locality in long-distance dependencies. Oxford: Blackwell.

  41. Boeckx, Cedric. 2012. Syntactic islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  42. Borer, Hagit. 1984. Restrictive relatives in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2 (2): 219–260.

  43. Borsley, Robert D., Maggie Tallerman, and David Willis. 2007. The syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  44. Bošković, Željko. 1998. LF movement and the Minimalist Program. In Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS) 28, eds. Pius N. Tamanji and Kiyomi Kusumoto, 43–57. Amherst: GLSA.

  45. Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (3): 351–384.

  46. Bošković, Željko. 2008. On successive-cyclic movement and the freezing effect of feature checking. In Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology, eds. Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedus, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 195–233. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  47. Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45 (1): 27–89.

  48. Bošković, Željko. 2016. What is sent to spell-out is phases, not phase complements. Linguistica 56 (1): 25–66.

  49. Brame, Michael. 1968. A new analysis of the relative clause: Evidence for an interpretive theory. Ms. MIT.

  50. Branigan, Phil, and Marguerite MacKenzie. 2002. Altruism, Ā-movement and object agreement in Innu-aimûn. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (3): 385–407.

  51. Campos, Héctor. 1997. On subject extraction and the antiagreement effect in Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 28 (1): 92–119.

  52. Casali, Roderic F. 2012. [+ATR] dominance in Akan. Journal of West African Languages 39 (1): 33–59.

  53. Cheng, Lisa L. S., and Johan Rooryck. 2000. Licensing wh-in-situ. Syntax 3 (1): 1–19.

  54. Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A festschrift for Morris Halle, eds. Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  55. Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal syntax, eds. Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic.

  56. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

  57. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  58. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory. In The view from the building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  59. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka, and Samuel J. Keyser, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  60. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  61. Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–165. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  62. Christaller, Johann G. 1875/1964. A grammar of the Asante and Fante language called Tshi [Chwee, Twi]. New Jersey: Gregg Press.

  63. Citko, Barbara. 2014. Phase theory: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  64. Clements, George. 1984a. Binding domains in Kikuyu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 14: 37–56.

  65. Clements, George. 1984b. Principles of tone assignment in Kikuyu. In Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone, eds. George Clements and John Goldsmith, 281–339. Dordrecht: Foris.

  66. Clements, George, James McCloskey, Joan Maling, and Annie Zaenen. 1983. String-vacuous rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 14 (1): 1–17.

  67. Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon. 1998. The typology of wh-movement: Wh-questions in Malay. Syntax 1 (3): 221–258.

  68. Collins, Chris. 1993. Topics in Ewe syntax. PhD diss., MIT.

  69. Collins, Chris. 1994. Economy of derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition. Linguistic Inquiry 25 (1): 45–61.

  70. Davies, William D. 2003. Extreme locality in Madurese wh-questions. Syntax 6 (3): 237–259.

  71. Dayal, Veneeta. 2017. Does Hindi-Urdu have feature driven wh-movement to Spec vP? Linguistic Inquiry 48 (1): 159–172.

  72. Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. In The syntax of time, eds. Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, 143–180. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  73. de Vries, Mark. 2002. The syntax of relativization. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.

  74. Dolphyne, Florence A. 1988. The Akan (Twi-Fante) language: Its sound systems and tonal structure. Accra: Ghana University Press.

  75. Dolphyne, Florence A., and Mary E. Kropp Dakubu. 1988. The Volta-Comoé languages. In The languages of Ghana, ed. Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, 50–90. New York: Kegan Paul.

  76. du Plessis, Hans. 1977. Wh-movement in Afrikaans. Linguistic Inquiry 8 (4): 723–726.

  77. Dubinsky, Stanley, and Robert Hamilton. 1998. Epithets as antilogophoric pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 29 (4): 685–693.

  78. É. Kiss, Katalin. 1993. Wh-movement and specificity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11 (1): 85–120.

  79. Elbourne, Paul. 2001. E-type anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language Semantics 9 (3): 241–288.

  80. Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  81. Embick, David. 2015. The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Boston: de Gruyter.

  82. Embick, David, and Ralf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595.

  83. Embick, David, and Ralf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, eds. Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  84. Epée, Roger. 1976. On some rules that are not successive cyclic in Duala. Linguistic Inquiry 7 (1): 193–198.

  85. Ermisch, Sonja. 2006. Focus and topic constructions in Akan. Frankfurt Afrikanistische Blätter 18: 51–68.

  86. Ermisch, Sonja. 2007. Issues in the left periphery: A typological approach to topic and focus constructions. Frankfurt a.M: Peter Lang.

  87. Essegbey, James. 1999. Inherent complement verbs revisited: Towards an understanding of argument structure in Ewe. PhD diss., Radboud University Nijmegen.

  88. Essegbey, James. 2010. Inherent complement verbs and the basic double object construction in Gbe. In Topics in Kwa syntax, eds. Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, 177–193. Dordrecht: Springer.

  89. Felser, Claudia. 2004. Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114: 543–574.

  90. Fiedler, Ines, and Anne Schwarz. 2005. Out-of-focus encoding in Gur and Kwa. In Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 03, eds. Shinichiro Ishihara, Michaela Schmitz, and Anne Schwarz, 111–142. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.

  91. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  92. Finer, Daniel L. 1997. Contrasting ā-dependencies in Selayarese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15 (4): 677–728.

  93. Fox, Danny. 1999. Reconstruction, Binding Theory and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 157–196.

  94. Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the Copy Theory of Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (1): 63–96.

  95. Fraser, Bruce. 1970. Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 6 (1): 22–42.

  96. Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  97. Geis, Michael L. 1970. Adverbial subordinate clauses in English. PhD diss., MIT.

  98. Geis, Michael L. 1975. English time and place adverbials. In Working papers in linguistics no. 18, eds. Michael L. Geis, Sheila G. Geoghegan, Jeanette K. Gundel, Ronald L. Neeld, Geoffrey K. Pullum, and Arnold M. Zwicky, 1–24. Columbus: Ohio State University.

  99. Genzel, Susanne. 2013. Lexical and post-lexical tones in Akan. PhD diss., Universität Potsdam.

  100. Genzel, Susanne, and Frank Kügler. 2010. How to elicit semi-spontaneous focus realizations with specific tonal patterns. In Linguistic fieldnotes i: Information structure in different African languages, eds. Mira Grubic, Susanne Genzel, and Frank Kügler, 77–102. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.

  101. Georgi, Doreen. 2014. Opaque interactions of Merge and Agree: On the nature and order of elementary operations. PhD diss., Universität Leipzig.

  102. Georgi, Doreen. 2017. Patterns of movement reflexes as the result of the order of Merge and Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 48 (4): 585–626.

  103. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Jason Merchant. 1998. Reverse sluicing in English and Greek. The Linguistic Review 15 (2–3): 233–256.

  104. Goodluck, Helen, Kofi K. Saah, and Danijela Stojanović. 1995. On the default mechanism for interrogative binding. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 40 (4): 377–404.

  105. Griffiths, James, and Anikó Lipták. 2014. Contrast and island sensitivity. Syntax 17 (3): 189–234.

  106. Guilliot, Nicolas, and Nouman Malkawi. 2006. When resumption determines reconstruction. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 25, eds. Donald Baumer, David Montero, and Michael Scanlon, 168–176. Cambridge: Cascadilla Press.

  107. Guilliot, Nicolas, and Nouman Malkawi. 2011. Weak versus strong resumption: Covarying differently. In Resumptive pronouns at the interfaces, ed. Alain Rouveret, 395–423. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  108. Haegeman, Liliane. 2007. The movement analysis of temporal adverbial clauses. Folia Linguistica 41 (3–4): 279–325.

  109. Haegeman, Liliane. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120: 628–648.

  110. Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers at the interface, eds. Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang, and Martha McGinnis, 425–449. Cambridge: MITWPIL.

  111. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In The View from Building 20, eds. Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  112. Harizanov, Boris. 2014. Clitic doubling and the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32 (4): 1033–1088.

  113. Harley, Heidi. 2011. Affixation and the Mirror Principle. In Interfaces in linguistics: New research perspectives, eds. Raffaella Folli and Christiane Ullbricht, 166–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  114. Harley, Heidi. 2013. External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 125: 34–57.

  115. Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 2003. Distributed Morphology. In The second Glot international state-of-the-article book, eds. Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma, 463–496. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  116. Harwood, William. 2015. Being progressive is just a phase: Celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33 (2): 523–573.

  117. Heestand, Dustin, Ming Xiang, and Maria Polinsky. 2011. Resumption still does not rescue islands. Linguistic Inquiry 42 (1): 138–152.

  118. Hein, Johannes. 2017. Doubling and do-support in verbal fronting: Towards a typology of repair operations. Glossa 2 (1): 67–136.

  119. Hellan, Lars, Dorothée Beermann, and Eli S. Andenes. 2003. Towards a typology of serial verb constructions in Akan. In Studies in the languages of the Volta Basin, eds. Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu and E. Kwekuk Osam, Vol. 1, 61–86. Legon: University of Ghana.

  120. Henderson, Brent. 2013. Agreement and person in anti-agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31 (2): 453–481.

  121. Henry, Alison. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  122. Higginbotham, James. 1980. Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11 (4): 679–708.

  123. Hornstein, Norbert, Howard Lasnik, and Juan Uriagereka. 2007. The dynamics of islands: Speculations on the locality of movement. Linguistic Analysis 33 (1–2): 149–175.

  124. Huang, C. T. James. 1982. Move WH in a language without wh-movement. The Linguistic Review 1 (4): 369–416.

  125. Hunter, Tim, and Masaya Yoshida. 2016. A restriction on Vehicle Change and its interaction with movement. Linguistic Inquiry 47 (3): 561–571.

  126. Hyde, Brett. 2012. Alignment constraints. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30 (3): 789–836.

  127. Johnson, Kyle. 1988. Clausal gerunds, the ECP and Government. Linguistic Inquiry 19 (4): 585–609.

  128. Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan, and Karine Megerdoomian. 2011. Second-position clitics in the vP phase: The case of the Armenian auxiliary. Linguistic Inquiry 42 (1): 152–162.

  129. Kandybowicz, Jason. 2006. Comp-trace effects explained away. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 25, eds. Donald Baumer, David Montero, and Michael Scanlon, 220–228. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  130. Kandybowicz, Jason. 2008. The grammar of repetition: Nupe grammar at the syntax-phonology interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  131. Kandybowicz, Jason. 2009. Embracing edges: Syntactic and phono-syntactic edge sensitivity in Nupe. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27 (2): 305–344.

  132. Kandybowicz, Jason. 2015. On prosodic vacuity and verbal resumption in Asante Twi. Linguistic Inquiry 46 (2): 243–272.

  133. Kandybowicz, Jason. 2017. On prosodic variation and the distribution of wh-in-situ. Linguistic Variation 17 (1): 111–148.

  134. Kayne, Richard, and Jean-Yves Pollock. 1978. Stylistic inversion, successive-cyclicity and move NP in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9 (4): 595–621.

  135. Keine, Stefan. 2016. Probes and their horizons. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  136. Keine, Stefan. 2017. Agreement and vP phases. In A schrift to fest Kyle Johnson, eds. Nicholas LaCara, Keir Moulton, and Anne-Michelle Tessier, 177–185. Amherst: Linguistics Open Access Publications.

  137. Kim, Yuni. 2016. Tonal overwriting and inflectional exponence in Amuzgo. In Tone and inflection: New facts and new perspectives, eds. Enrique L. Palancar and Jean L. Léonard, 199–224. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  138. Kobele, Gregory M., and Harold Torrence. 2006. Intervention and focus in Asante Twi. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 46: 161–184.

  139. Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1982. Variables and the Bijection Principle. The Linguistic Review 2 (2): 136–160.

  140. Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1986. A note on long extraction in Vata and the ECP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4 (3): 357–374.

  141. Korsah, Sampson. 2016a. Beyond resumptives and expletives in Akan. In Diversity in African languages: Selected papers from the 46th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, eds. Doris L. Payne, Sara Pacchiarotti, and Mokaya Bosire, 103–117. Berlin: Language Science Press.

  142. Korsah, Sampson. 2016b. On deriving inherent complement verb constructions. In ConSOLE 23, eds. Kate Bellamy, Elena Karvovskaya, Martin Kohlberger, and George Saad, 52–69. Leiden: Leiden University Linguistics Centre.

  143. Korsah, Sampson. 2017. Issues in Kwa syntax: Pronouns and clausal determiners. PhD diss., Universität Leipzig.

  144. Korsah, Sampson, and Andrew Murphy. 2016. What can tone tell us about successive-cyclic movement? evidence from Asante Twi. In Proceedings of NELS 46, eds. Christopher Hammerly and Brandon Prickett, 227–240. Amherst: GLSA.

  145. Kramer, Ruth. 2010. The Amharic definite marker and the syntax-morphology interface. Syntax 13 (3): 196–240.

  146. Kratzer, Angelika, and Elisabeth Selkirk. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24 (2–3): 93–135.

  147. Kroch, Anthony. 1981. On the role of resumptive pronouns in amnestying island constraint violations. In Papers from the 17th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. Roberta A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek, and Mary F. Miller, 125–135. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  148. Kropp Dakubu, Mary Esther. 2009. Akan. In Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world, eds. Keith Brown and Sarah Ogilvie, 17–20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  149. Kügler, Frank. 2015. Phonological phrasing and ATR vowel harmony in Akan. Phonology 32 (1): 177–204.

  150. Kügler, Frank. 2016a. Embedded clauses and recursive prosodic phrasing in Akan. In Tonal Aspects of Languages 2016, ed. Christian DiCanio et al., 38–42. Baixas: ISCA.

  151. Kügler, Frank. 2016b. Tone and intonation in Akan. In Intonation in African tone languages, eds. Laura J. Downing and Annie Rialland, 89–130. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  152. Kurisu, Kazutaka. 2001. The phonology of morpheme realization. PhD diss., University of California Santa Cruz.

  153. Kusmer, Leland. 2011. There is no future: Diachronic verbal morphology in Fante Twi. Ms. Swarthmore College.

  154. Kusumoto, Kiyomi. 2017. Geis-ambiguity and tense harmony. In A schrift to fest Kyle Johnson, eds. Nicholas LaCara, Keir Moulton, and Anne-Michelle Tessier, 203–205. Amherst: Linguistics Open Access Publications.

  155. Lahne, Antje. 2008. Where there is fire there is smoke. Local modelling of successive-cyclic movement. PhD diss., Universität Leipzig.

  156. Landman, Meredith. 2003. Morphological contiguity. In Papers in Optimality Theory II: University of Massachusetts-Amherst Occasional Papers in Linguistics, eds. Angela Carpenter, Andries Coetzee, and Paul de Lacy, Vol. 26. Amherst: GLSA.

  157. Larson, Richard K. 1987. ‘Missing prepositions’ and the analysis of English free relative constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 18 (2): 239–266.

  158. Larson, Richard K. 1990. Extraction and multiple selection in PP. The Linguistic Review 7 (2): 169–182.

  159. Larson, Richard K., and Robert May. 1990. Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: Reply to Baltin. Linguistic Inquiry 21 (1): 103–122.

  160. Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS) 31, eds. Minjoo Kim and Uri Strauss, 301–320. Amherst: GLSA.

  161. Lasnik, Howard, and Tim Stowell. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22 (4): 687–720.

  162. Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34 (3): 506–516.

  163. Manetta, Emily. 2010. Wh-expletives in Hindi-Urdu: The vP phase. Linguistic Inquiry 41 (1): 1–34.

  164. Marfo, Charles. 2005a. Akan focus and topic constructions and the prosody-syntax interface. Journal of West African Languages 32 (1–2): 45–59.

  165. Marfo, Charles. 2005b. Aspects of Akan grammar and the phonology-syntax interface. PhD diss., University of Hong Kong.

  166. Marfo, Charles, and Adams Bodomo. 2005. Information structuring in Akan question-word fronting and focus constructions. Studies in African Linguistics 32 (4): 179–208.

  167. May, Robert C. 1985. Logical Form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  168. McCarthy, John J. 2010. Autosegmental spreading in Optimality Theory. In Tones and features: Phonetic and phonological perspectives, eds. John A. Goldsmith, Elizabeth Hume, and Leo Wetzels, 195–222. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  169. McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of morphology 1993, eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  170. McCloskey, James. 1979. Transformational syntax and model theoretic semantics: A case study in Modern Irish. Riedel: Dordrecht.

  171. McCloskey, James. 2000. Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (1): 57–84.

  172. McCloskey, James. 2001. The morphosyntax of WH-extraction in Irish. Journal of Linguistics 37 (1): 67–100.

  173. McCloskey, James. 2002. Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, eds. Samuel Epstein and T. David Seely, 184–226. Oxford: Blackwell.

  174. McCloskey, James. 2011. Resumptive pronouns, Ā-binding and levels of representation in Irish. In Resumptive pronouns at the interfaces, ed. Alain Rouveret, 65–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  175. McCracken, Chelsea. 2013. Relative clauses in Asante Twi. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 1–28.

  176. McPherson, Laura. 2014. Replacive grammatical tone in the Dogon languages. PhD diss., UCLA.

  177. McPherson, Laura, and Jeffrey Heath. 2016. Phrasal grammatical tone in the Dogon languages: The role of constraint interaction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34 (2): 593–639.

  178. Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  179. Morgan, Adam M., and Matthew W. Wagers. 2018. English resumptive pronouns are more common where gaps are less acceptable. Linguistic Inquiry 49 (4): 861–876.

  180. Müller, Gereon. 2007. Towards a relativized concept of Cyclic Linearization. In Interfaces + recursion = language?, eds. Uli Sauerland and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 61–114. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  181. Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on displacement: A phase-based approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  182. Muriungi, Peter. 2005. Wh-questions in Kitharaka. Studies in African Linguistics 34 (1): 43–104.

  183. Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

  184. Nissenbaum, Jon. 2000. Investigations of covert phrase movement. PhD diss., MIT.

  185. Noonan, Máire. 1999. Successive cyclicity phenomena in wh-movement constructions. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 18, eds. Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason Haugen, and Peter Norquest, 406–419. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

  186. Noonan, Máire. 2002. CP-pied-piping and remnant IP movement in long distance wh-movement. In Dimensions of movement: From features to remnants, eds. Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Sjef Barbiers, and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 269–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  187. Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan A. Sag, and Thomas Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70 (3): 491–538.

  188. Nwachukwu, P. Akujuoobi. 1985. Inherent complement verbs in Igbo. Journal of the Linguistics Association of Nigeria (JOLAN) 3: 61–74.

  189. Ofori, Seth Antwi. 2006. Topics in Akan grammar. PhD diss., Indiana University.

  190. Ofori, Seth Antwi. 2011. On the basic focus marker, and the basic focus sentence, in Akan (Twi). Nordic Journal of African Studies 20 (3): 241–262.

  191. Osam, Emmanuel K. 1994. Aspects of Akan grammar: A functional perspective. PhD diss., University of Oregon.

  192. Osam, Emmanuel K. 1996. Animacy distinctions in Akan grammar. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 23 (2): 153–164.

  193. Osam, Emmanuel K. 2008. Akan as an aspectual language. In Aspect and modality in Kwa languages, eds. Felix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, 69–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  194. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1993. Subject-extraction, negation and the anti-agreement effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11 (3): 477–518.

  195. Pan, Victor J. 2016. Resumptivity in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  196. Panitz, Ezekiel J. 2014. Strong islands, resumption and reconstruction. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 13–42.

  197. Paster, Mary. 2010. The verbal morphology and phonology of Asante Twi. Studies in African Linguistics 39 (1): 77–120.

  198. Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding. In Representation of (in)definiteness, eds. Eric Reuland and Alice Ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  199. Pesetsky, David. 1998. Some Optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the best good enough? optimality and competition in syntax, eds. Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky, 337–383. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  200. Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  201. Pfeil, Simone, Susanne Genzel, and Frank Kügler. 2015. Empirical investigation of focus and exhaustivity in Akan. In Mood, exhaustivity and focus marking in non-european languages, eds. Felix Bildhauer and Mira Grubic, 87–109. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.

  202. Postal, Paul M. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Report of the 17th annual round table meeting on language and linguistics, ed. F. P. Dinneen, 177–206. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.

  203. Postal, Paul M. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  204. Reglero, Lara. 2007. Wh-in-situ interrogatives in Spanish. Probus 19 (1): 267–297.

  205. Reinhart, Tanya. 1998. Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program. Natural Language Semantics 6 (1): 29–56.

  206. Reintges, Chris H., Philip LeSourd, and Sandra Chung. 2006. Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ. In Wh-movement: Moving on, eds. Lisa Cheng and Norbert Corver, 165–194. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  207. Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  208. Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering trees. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  209. Riis, Hans N. 1854. Grammatical outline and vocabulary of the Oji-language with especial reference to the Akuapim-dialect. Basel: G. Detloff.

  210. Ross, John R. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the 5th regional meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), eds. Robert Binnick, Alice Davidson, Georgia Green, and Jerry Morgan, 252–286. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  211. Ross, John R. 1986. Infinite syntax! Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

  212. Rouveret, Alain. 2008. Phasal agreement and reconstruction. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vegnaud, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 167–195. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  213. Ruys, Eddy G. 2000. Weak Crossover as a scope phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (3): 513–539.

  214. Ruys, Eddy G. 2004. A note on weakest Crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 35 (1): 124–140.

  215. Saah, Kofi K. 1988. Wh-questions in Akan. Journal of West African Languages 18 (1): 17–28.

  216. Saah, Kofi K. 1989. Reflexivization in Akan. Journal of West African Languages 19 (2): 15–28.

  217. Saah, Kofi K. 1992. Null object constructions in Akan. In Proceedings of the Kwa comparative syntax workshop, eds. Chris Collins and Victor Manfredi, 219–244. Cambridge: MITWPL.

  218. Saah, Kofi K. 1994. Studies in Akan syntax, acquisition and sentence processing. PhD diss., University of Ottawa.

  219. Saah, Kofi K. 2010. Relative clauses in Akan. In Topics in Kwa syntax, eds. Enoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, 91–109. Dordrecht: Springer.

  220. Saah, Kofi K., and Helen Goodluck. 1995. Island effects in parsing and grammar: Evidence from Akan. The Linguistic Review 12 (4): 381–409.

  221. Saddy, Douglas. 1991. Wh-scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia. In More papers on wh-movement, eds. Lisa L.-S. Cheng and Hamida Demirdache, 183–218. Cambridge: MITWPIL.

  222. Safir, Ken. 1984. Multiple variable binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (4): 603–638.

  223. Safir, Ken. 1996. Derivation, representation and resumption: The domain of Weak Crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 27 (2): 313–339.

  224. Safir, Ken. 1999. Vehicle Change and reconstruction in Ā-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (4): 587–620.

  225. Salzmann, Martin. 2017a. Prolepsis. In The Wiley-Blackwell companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, Vol. 5, 3203–3245. Somerset: Wiley-Blackwell.

  226. Salzmann, Martin. 2017b. Reconstruction and resumption in indirect A-dependencies: On the syntax of prolepsis and relativization in (Swiss) German and beyond. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  227. Sato, Yosuke. 2012. Multiple spell-out and contraction at the syntax-phonology interface. Syntax 15 (3): 287–314.

  228. Sato, Yosuke, and Yoshihito Dobashi. 2016. Prosodic phrasing and the That-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 47 (2): 333–349.

  229. Sauerland, Uli. 2003. Intermediate adjunction with A-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 34 (2): 308–314.

  230. Schachter, Paul. 1969. Natural assimilation rules in Akan. International Journal of American Linguistics 35 (4): 342–355.

  231. Schachter, Paul. 1973. Focus and relativization. Language 49 (1): 19–46.

  232. Schachter, Paul, and Victoria Fromkin. 1968. A phonology of Akan: Akuapem, Asante, Fante. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.

  233. Schneider-Zioga, Patricia. 2007. Anti-agreement, anti-locality and minimality: The syntax of dislocated subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (2): 403–446.

  234. Schneider-Zioga, Patricia. 2009. Wh-agreement and bounded unbounded movement. In Merging features: Computation, interpretation and acquisition, eds. José M. Brucart, Anna Gavarró, and Jaume Solà, 46–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  235. Schwarz, Anne, and Ines Fiedler. 2007. Narrative focus strategies in Gur and Kwa. In Focus strategies in African languages: The interaction of focus and grammar in Niger-Congo and Afro-Asiatic, eds. Enoch O. Aboh, Katharina Hartmann, and Malte Zimmermann, 267–286. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  236. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 371–405.

  237. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In The handbook of phonological theory, eds. John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan Yu, 435–485. Oxford: Blackwell.

  238. Sells, Peter. 1984. Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  239. Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive pronouns as a Last Resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23 (3): 443–468.

  240. Sichel, Ivy. 2014. Resumptives pronouns and competition. Linguistic Inquiry 45 (4): 655–693.

  241. Soh, Hooi Ling. 2005. Wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 36 (1): 143–155.

  242. Stump, Gregory. 2016. Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  243. Thiersch, Craig. 1978. Topics in German syntax. PhD diss., MIT.

  244. Thompson, Ellen. 1995. Temporal ambiguity of clausal adverbs and the syntax of simultaneity. In Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS) 25, ed. Jill Beckman, 473–487. Amherst: GLSA.

  245. Thoms, Gary. 2011. From economy to locality: do-support as head movement. Ms. Strathclyde University.

  246. Titov, Elena. 2019. Morphosyntactic encoding of information structure in Akan. Glossa 4 (1): 27–136.

  247. Torrego, Esther. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (1): 103–129.

  248. Trommer, Jochen. 2011. Phonological aspects of Western Nilotic mutation morphology. Habilitation thesis, Universität Leipzig.

  249. Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 219–255.

  250. van Urk, Coppe. 2015. A uniform syntax for phrasal movement: A case study of Dinka Bor. PhD diss., MIT.

  251. van Urk, Coppe. 2018. Pronoun copying in Dinka and the Copy Theory of Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36 (3): 937–990.

  252. van Urk, Coppe, and Norvin Richards. 2015. Two components of long-distance extraction: Successive cyclicity in Dinka. Linguistic Inquiry 46 (1): 113–155.

  253. Vergnaud, Jean Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. PhD diss., MIT.

  254. Wiland, Bartosz. 2010. Overt evidence from Left-Branch Extraction in Polish for puncuated paths. Linguistic Inquiry 41 (2): 335–347.

  255. Willis, David. 2000. On the distribution of resumptive pronouns and wh-trace in Welsh. Journal of Linguistics 36 (3): 531–573.

  256. Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press.

  257. Zaenen, Annie. 1983. On syntactic binding. Linguistic Inquiry 14 (3): 469–504.

  258. Zaenen, Annie, Elisabeth Engdahl, and Joan M. Maling. 1981. Resumptive pronouns can be syntactically bound. Linguistic Inquiry 12 (4): 679–682.

  259. Zentz, Jason. 2014. Morphological evidence for a movement analysis of adverbial clauses. In Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 47, eds. Carissa Abrego-Collier, Arum Kang, Martina Martinović, and Chieu Nguyen, 373–385. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  260. Zimmermann, Eva. 2017. Morphological length and prosodically defective morphemes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank three anonymous NLLT reviewers for their valuable and challenging comments. For helpful feedback on various stages of this work, we would like to thank audiences at Morphosyntactic Triggers of Tone at Universität Leipzig, Syntax Brown Bag at NYU, LingLunch at UConn, NELS 45 at Concordia University, Montréal, SyntaxLab at the University of Cambridge and colloquia at University College London, Leibniz-Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin and University of California Santa Cruz. Thanks also go to Augstina Pokua Owusu and Joana Serwaa Ampofo for discussion of the data. This research was completed as part of the DFG research training group Interaction of Grammatical Building Blocks (GRK 2011).

Author information

Correspondence to Andrew Murphy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korsah, S., Murphy, A. Tonal reflexes of movement in Asante Twi. Nat Lang Linguist Theory (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09456-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Movement
  • Phases
  • Successive-cyclic movement
  • Tone
  • Syntax