Skip to main content
Log in

Adjectival extremeness: degree modification and contextually restricted scales

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that degree modifiers such as flat-out, downright, positively, and straight-up constitute a distinct natural class specialized for modifying extreme adjectives (such as gigantic, fantastic, or gorgeous), and that extreme adjectives themselves come in two varieties: ones that encode extremeness as part of their lexical semantics and ones that can acquire it on the basis of contextual factors. These facts suggest that a theory is required of what it means for an adjective to be ‘extreme’ in the relevant sense. I propose one, based on the idea that in any given context, we restrict our attention to a particular salient portion of a scale. To reflect this, I suggest that quantification over degrees is—like quantification in other domains—contextually restricted. Extreme adjectives and corresponding degree modifiers can thus both be understood as a means of signaling that a degree lies outside a contextually-provided range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., MIT.

  • Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35 (1): 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional adjectives, eds. Manfred Bierwisch and Ewald Lang. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjective comparison: a semantic scale. Journal of English Linguistics. doi:10.1177/007542426700100102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, Dwight L. 1972. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4 (3): 275–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Adriana Belletti, 39–103. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corver, Norbert. 1990. The syntax of left branch extractions. PhD diss., Tilburg University.

  • Cresswell, Max J. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. Barbara H. Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D. Allan. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David. 2007. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1007/s11049-006-9002-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny, and Martin Hackl. 2006. The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (5): 537–586. doi:10.1007/s10988-006-9004-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2007. The landscape of even. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (1): 39–81. doi:10.1007/s11049-006-9006-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. Extended projection. Ms., Brandeis University.

  • Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Proceedings of the second annual west coast conference on formal linguistics, eds. Michael Barlow, Daniel Flickinger, and Michael Westcoat, 114–126. Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 10, eds. Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, 40–64. Ithaca: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD diss., UCLA.

  • Horn, Laurence R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61 (1): 121–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, Nirit, and Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (4): 353–422. doi:10.1007/BF00985272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri, and Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Syntax and semantics 11: Presupposition, eds. Choon-Kyu Oh and David Dineen, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. PhD diss., UC Santa Cruz. Published in 1999 by Garland, New York.

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (1): 1–45. doi:10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81 (2): 345–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1): 1–45. doi:10.1007/BF00351812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1999. Beyond Ouch and Oops: How descriptive and expressive meaning interact. Ms., University of Massachusetts Amherst; presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency.

  • Krifka, Manfred. 2002. Be brief and vague! and how Bidirectional Optimality Theory allows for verbosity. In Sounds and systems: Studies in structure and change: A festschrift for theo vennemann, eds. David Restle and Dietmar Zaefferer. Vol. 141 of Trends in linguistics studies and monographs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Approximate interpretations of number words: A case for strategic communication. In Cognitive foundations of interpretation, eds. Gerlof Bouma, Irene Kräer, and Joost Zwarts, 111–126. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschapen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred. 1991. Structures for semantics. Studies in linguistics and philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75 (3): 522–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. Also in Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli and Arnim von Stechow, eds. 1979. Semantics from Different Points of View. Springer, Berlin.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morzycki, Marcin. 2004/2008. Adverbial modification in AP: Evaluatives and a little beyond. In Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, eds. Johannes Dölling and Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow, 103–126. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English. Vol. 92 of Lund studies in English. Lund: Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12 (1): 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkal, Manfred. 1995. Logic and the lexicon: The semantics of the indefinite. Vol. 56 of Studies in linguistics and philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Translated by Geoffrey Simmons. Originally published in 1985 as Logik und Lexikon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Christopher. 2003. The logic of conventional implicatures. PhD diss., UC Santa Cruz. Published in 2005 by Oxford University Press.

  • Potts, Christopher. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 165–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Christopher. 2008. Interpretive economy, schelling points, and evolutionary stability. Ms., University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  • Rawlins, Kyle, and Ruth Kramer. To appear. Polarity particles: an ellipsis account. In Proceedings of the north east linguistic society (NELS) 39. Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Rett, Jessica. 2008a. Antonymy and evaluativity. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 17. Ithaca: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rett, Jessica. 2008b. Degree modification in natural language. PhD diss., Rutgers University.

  • Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  • Rotstein, Carmen, and Yoad Winter. 2001. Partial adjectives vs. total adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modification. In Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of Wh-constructions. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI9524743.

  • Rullmann, Hotze. 1997. Even, polarity, and scope. In Papers in experimental and theoretical linguistics, eds. Martha Gibson, Grace Wiebe, and Gary Libben, Vol. 4, 40–64. University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, Edward. 1944. Grading, a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 11 (2): 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, Uli, and Penka Stateva. 2007. Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: Evidence from approximators. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 17, eds. Masayuki Gibson and Tova Friedman. Ithaca: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (1): 29–120. doi:10.1023/A:1022225203544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, Philippe. 2007. Expressive presuppositions. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 2008. The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (2): 308–331. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00049.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanon, Benny. 1976. On the two kinds of presuppositions in natural language. Foundations of Language 14: 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syrett, Kristen, Christopher Kennedy, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2006. Meaning and context in children’s understanding of gradable adjectives. Ms., University of Chicago and University of Maryland.

  • Syrett, Kristen, Evan Bradley, Christopher Kennedy, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2005. Shifting standards: Children’s understanding of gradable adjectives. In Proceedings of generative approaches to language acquisition North America (GALANA).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, Kai. 2004. Would you believe it? the king of France is back! Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions. In Descriptions and beyond, eds. Marga Reimer and Anne Bezuidenhout. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl, Dag. 1985. Determiners and context sets. In Generalized quantifiers in natural language, eds. Johan van Bentham and Alice ter Meulen. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Karina. 1996. The scope of even. Natural Language Semantics 4 (3): 193–215. doi:10.1007/BF00372819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79 (1): 39–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Morzycki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morzycki, M. Adjectival extremeness: degree modification and contextually restricted scales. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 30, 567–609 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9162-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9162-0

Keywords

Navigation