Skip to main content
Log in

Adverb classes and the nature of minimality

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we report a new interaction pattern among adverb classes in the context of movement and examine the implications of this pattern with respect to Rizzi’s (1990, 2001) Relativized Minimality, Chomsky’s (1995) Minimal Link Condition, and Ernst’s (2002) Fact-Event Object Calculus. In Sect. 1, we review the relevant data in the literature. Our new contribution is reported in Sect. 2 using wh-movement and four sample adverb classes. Section 3 shows that the pattern holds for various other types of movement as well (neutral preposing, focalization, and clefting in English; scrambling in Russian). We also discuss the behavior of NPs, PPs, and verbal heads here. Section 4 focuses on the theoretical significance of the new facts. In Appendix A, we provide a more comprehensive demonstration of how various adverb classes obey the pattern established in Sects. 2–3. Appendix B is an actual sample of the verbal context we presented to our informants for soliciting subtle data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb placement: A case study in antisymmetric syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrs, Andrew, and Howard Lasnik. 1986. A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On Wh-movement. In Formal syntax, eds. Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114: 683–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Complement and adverbial PPs: Implications for clause structure. In Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 4, 145–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2007. On the role of semantics in a theory of adverb syntax. Lingua 117: 1008–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2009. Speaker-oriented adverbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27: 497–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Warner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Modifying adjuncts, eds. Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn, and Fabricius-Hansen Cathrine, 163–209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, Naoki, and Yuji Takano. 1998. Symmetry in syntax: Merge and demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 27–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert, and Martin Prinzhorn. 1986. Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Jerrold, and Paul Postal. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan. 1978. Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1998. Comparative studies in word order variation: Adverbs, pronouns, and clause structure in Romance and Germanic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2004. The feature-based theory of adverb syntax. In Adverbials: The interplay between meaning, context and syntactic structure, eds. Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg, and Gisa Rauh, 205–252. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1993. Move-α. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Formal semantics of natural language, ed. Edward Keenan, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei. 1990. Conditions on X0-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.

  • Li, Yafei. 1997. An optimized UG and biological redundancies. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 170–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei. 2005. X 0 : A theory of the morphology-syntax interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonzi, Lidia. 1991. Il sintagma avverbiale. In Grande grammatical Italiana di consultazione, Vol. 2, eds. Lorenzo Renzi and Giampaolo Salvi, 342–412. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, Maria-Luisa. 1991. Long head-movement and negation: Serbo-Croation vs. Slovak and Czech. The Linguistic Review 8: 319–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. Relativized minimality effects. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, eds. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 89–110. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2005. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and beyond: Volume 3: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Adriana Belletti, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian. 2001. Head movement. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, eds. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 113–147. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Rebecca. 2009. Intervention and rescue: Arguments for representational constraints on syntactic dependencies. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin.

  • Shields, Rebecca. In progress. Modal repair and quantifier restriction: Epistemic adverbs in C operator clauses. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Schlyter, Suzanne. 1974. Une hiérarchie d’adverbes et leur distribution—par quelle transformation. In Actes du colloque Franco-Allemand de grammaire transformationnelle, Vol. II, eds. Christian Rohrer and Nicholas Ruwet, 76–84. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Lisa. 1988. The syntax of adverbs. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics/Cahiers linguistiques de McGill, Special Issue May: 280–310.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Shields.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Shields, R. & Lin, V. Adverb classes and the nature of minimality. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 30, 217–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9158-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9158-9

Keywords

Navigation