Abstract
In their paper Reaching Agreement, Bock and Middleton (2011) review a vast array of psycholinguistic experiments on semantic influences in agreement which they argue provide critical empirical evidence to the longstanding debate about the role of meaning in syntax. The authors propose to unify these findings within the Marking and Morphing model, the reference framework for many psycholinguistic studies of agreement production. In this commentary, I discuss four concerns about the approach advocated by Bock and Middleton: (1) the pervasive confusion with respect to the definition of agreement, and its conceptual consequences on the debate about the role of meaning in syntax, (2) the infelicitous comparison between pronouns and verbs providing the empirical foundations of Marking and Morphing, (3) the existence of a set of experimental findings invalidating the assumption of the model with respect to the relation between feature transmission and morphology, (4) the lack of assumptions of Marking and Morphing with respect to the process of feature transmission, hence its inability to account for the structural effects on attraction. In response to these concerns, I present an alternative model, Selection and Copy, and sketch a line of research that explores the workings of the Copy component. I then address the criticisms raised by Bock and Middleton against this research and question the explanatory force of Marking and Morphing as a model of agreement defined as a core syntactic process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, Mark C. 2011. When agreement is for number and gender but not person. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(4).
Bock, J. Kathryn, and J. Cooper Cutting. 1992. Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 31: 99–127.
Bock, J. Kathryn, and Kathleen M. Eberhard. 1993. Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 8: 57–99.
Bock, J. Kathryn, and Willem J. Levelt. 1994. Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. Morton A. Gernsbacher, 945–984. San Diego: Academic Press.
Bock, J. Kathryn, and Erica L. Middleton. 2011. Reaching agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(4).
Bock, J. Kathryn, and Carol A. Miller. 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 23: 45–93.
Caramazza, Alfonso, Michele Miozzo, Albert Costa, Niels Schiller, and François-Xavier Alario. 2001. Lexical selection: A cross-language investigation of determiner production. In Language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler, ed. Emmanuel Dupoux, 209–226. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. Agreement and control in expletive constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 521–533.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chung, Sandra. 1998. The design of agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
den Dikken, Marcel. 2003. Agreement. In Encyclopedia of cognitive science, ed. Lynn Nadel, London: Macmillan.
Eberhard, Kathleen M., J. Cooper Cutting, and J. Kathryn Bock. 2005. Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review 112: 531–559.
Franck, Julie, Gabriella Vigliocco, and Julie Nicol. 2002. Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes 17: 371–404.
Franck, Julie, Stéphanie Cronel-Ohayon, Laurence Chillier, Ulrich H. Frauenfelder, Cornalia Hamann, Luigi Rizzi, and Pascal Zesiger. 2004. Normal and pathological development of subject-verb agreement in speech production: A study on French children. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17: 147–180.
Franck, Julie, Glenda Lassi, Ulrich H. Frauenfelder, and Luigi Rizzi. 2006. Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition 101: 173–216.
Franck, Julie, Ulrich H. Frauenfelder, and Luigi Rizzi. 2007. A syntactic analysis of interference in subject-verb agreement. In The state of the art in speech error research, eds. C. Schutze and V. Ferreira. MIT working papers in linguistics, 173–190.
Franck, Julie, Gabriella Vigliocco, Inés Antón-Méndez, Simona Collina, and Ulrich H. Frauenfelder. 2008. The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 23: 329–374.
Franck, Julie, Gabriela Soare, Ulrich H. Frauenfelder, and Luigi Rizzi. 2010. Object interference in subject-verb agreement: The role of intermediate traces of movement. Journal of Memory and Language 62: 166–182.
Garrett, Merrill F. 1980. Levels of processing in sentence production. In Language production, Vol. 1: Speech and talk, ed. Brian Butterworth, 177–220. London: Academic Press.
Goldrick, Matthew. 2006. Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes 21: 817–855.
Guasti, Teresa, and Luigi Rizzi. 2002. Agreement and tense as distinct syntactic positions. Evidence from acquisition. In The structure of DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 1, ed. Guglielmo Cinque, 167–194. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hartsuiker, Robert J., Herbert J. Schriefers, J. Kathryn Bock, and Gerdien M. Kikstra. 2003. Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement. Memory and Cognition 31: 1316–1326.
Haskell, Todd R., and C. Maryellen MacDonald. 2003. Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 760–778.
Legate, Julie A. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 506–516.
Meyer, Antje S., and J. Kathryn Bock. 1999. Representations and processes in the production of pronouns: Some perspectives from Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 41: 281–301.
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple Agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(4).
Rapp, Brenda, and Matthew Goldrick. 2000. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review 107: 460–499.
Schütze, Carlson. 1997. INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, case and licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Staub, Adrian. 2009. On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. Journal of Memory and Language 60: 308–327.
Staub, Adrian. 2010. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition 116: 71–86.
Vigliocco, Gabriella, and Janet Nicol. 1998. Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition 68: 13–29.
Vigliocco, Gabriella, and Tiziana Zilli. 1999. Syntactic accuracy in sentence production: Gender disagreement in Italian language impaired and unimpaired speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 623–648.
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Brian Butterworth, and Carlo Semenza. 1995. Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 186–215.
Wagers, Matthew W., Ellen F. Lau, and Colin Phillips. 2009. Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language 61: 206–237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franck, J. Reaching agreement as a core syntactic process. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 29, 1071–1086 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9153-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9153-1