Skip to main content
Log in

Little v and parametric variation

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much current work assumes that “little v” (henceforth v) is a universal functional category directly involved in the building of predicates. As a functional category, one would expect v to be the locus of parametric variation, as predicted by Hagit Borer’s (1984) original hypothesis. Some analyses have shown that v is involved in parametric variation concerning Case (Legate 2008) and probably Object Shift (Chomsky 2001). In this article, we argue that v is also involved in other forms of cross-linguistic variation, thus extending parameter theory in some unexpected directions. In particular, we argue that v is involved in three different features of cross-linguistic variation: the order of verb and complements, their prosodic structure and the expression of focus/background articulation.

Our data come from a code-switching variety called Esplugish, part and parcel of the I-language of a community of German/Spanish bilinguals. In Esplugish, as in other code-switching varieties, it is possible to switch between v (L1) and its complement VP/RootP (L2). Surprisingly, we find that the grammatical properties of the VP/RootP are those of L1 and not those of L2, a fact that we account for by arguing that the source of those properties is the v.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annamalai, E.. 1989. The language factor in code mixing. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 75: 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arad, Maya. 2002. Universal features and language-particular morphemes. In Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. Artemis Alexiadou, 15–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavin, Edith, and Tim Shopen. 1985. Warlpiri and English: Languages in contact. In Australia, meeting place of languages, ed. Michael Clyne, 81–94. Canberra: Australia National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belazi, Hedi M., Edward J. Rubin, and Jacqueline Toribio Almeida. 1994. Code switching and X-Bar theory: The functional head constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2007. Understanding minimalist syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, Cedric, and Kleanthes Grohmann. 2007. Putting phases in perspective. Syntax 10: 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeschoten, Hendrik E., and Ludo T. Verhoeven. 1985. Integration niederländisher lexikalischer Elemente ins Türkische: Sprachmischung bei Immigranten der ersten und zweiten Generation. Linguistische Berichte 98: 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2007. On the locality and motivation of move and agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 589–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel. 2001. Let’s phrase it!—Focus, word order, and prosodic phrasing in German double object constructions. In Competition in Syntax, eds. Gereon Müller and Wolfang Sternefeld, 69–105. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel, and Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo. 2001. Focus related word order variation without the NSR: A prosody-based crosslinguistic analysis. Manuscript, UCSC.

  • Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, Kip. 1980. A note on Navajo–English code-mixing. Anthropological Linguistics 22: 218–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Brian Hok-Shing. 2008. Code switching, word order and the lexical/functional category distinction. Lingua 118: 777–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martins, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Gorka Eliordeta, Sónia Frota, Pilar Prieto, and Marina Vigário. 2005. Intonational phrasing in Romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure. In Prosodies. With special reference to Romance languages, eds. Sónia Frota, Marina Vigário, and Maria João Freitas, 59–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Hoop, Helen. 1996. Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Besten, Hans. 1977. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Unpublished manuscript, MIT and University of Amsterdam.

  • Den Dikken, Marcel, and Shoba Bandi Rao. 2003. Light Switches. Unpublished manuscript, CUNY and NYU.

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, Pieter Muysken, and Roy Singh. 1986. Government and Code Mixing. Journal of Linguistics 22: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erteschik-Shir, Naomi. 2007. Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley. 2007. Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, Naoki, and Mamoru Saito. 1998. Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Vilbazo, Kay-Eduardo. 2005. Die Syntax des Code-Switching. Esplugisch: Sprachwechsel an der Deutschen Schule Barcelona. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universität zu Köln.

  • González-Vilbazo, Kay-Eduardo. 2011. Die Syntax des Codeswitching: Funktionale Restriktion und Kongruenz. Tübingen: Niemeyer (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Vilbazo, Kay-Eduardo, and Luis López. 2011. Some properties of light verbs in code-switching. Lingua 121(5): 832–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Vilbazo, Kay-Eduardo, and Volker Struckmeier. 2008. Asymmetrien im code-switching: Eine DM-Lösung zur Partizipselektion. In Romanistische Sprachwissenschaft—minimalistisch, eds. Guido Mensching and Eva-Maria Remberger, 83–102. Tübingen: G. Narr Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, Günther. 2005. The discourse configurationality of scrambling. In The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity, eds. Joachim Sabel and Mamoru Saito, 75–135. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti, Maria-Teresa. 1992. Causative and perception verbs: A comparative study. Torino: Rosenberg and Sollier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphan approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics, eds. Shuji Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma, and Takao Yagi, 232–253. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, Aravind K.. 1985. Processing of sentences with intrasentential code switching. In Natural language parsing. Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, eds. David Dowty, Laurie Kattunen, and Arnold Zwicky, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, Mary. 2003. Child L2 acquisition: An insider account. In (In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism, ed. Natascha Müller, 271–294. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Beviamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1975. French syntax. The transformational cycle. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, eds. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 109–138. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika, and Elisabeth Selkirk. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spell-out: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24: 93–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 55–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenerz, Jürgen. 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr, Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, Luis. 2001. On the (non)complementarity of theta theory and checking theory. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 694–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, Luis. 2002. On agreement: Locality and feature valuation. In Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. Artemis Alexiadou, 165–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, Luis. 2003. Steps for a well adjusted dislocation. Studia Linguistica 57: 193–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, Luis. 2007. Locality and the architecture of syntactic dependencies. London: Palgrave-McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • López, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacSwan, Jeff. 1999. A minimalist approach to intrasentential code switching. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahootian, Shahrzad. 1993. A null theory of code-switching. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.

  • Mahootian, Shahrzad, and Beatrice Santorini. 1996. Code switching and the complement/adjunct distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 464–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Do not try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics, Vol. 4.1, eds. Alexis Demitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark, and Alexander Williams, 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics circle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993. Duelling languages. Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2002. Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers-Scotton, Carol, and Janice Jake. 2009. A universal model of codeswitching and bilingual language processing and production. In The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching, eds. Barbara Bullock and Jacqueline Toribio, 336–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, Miwa, and Keumsil Kim Yoon. 1998. Head directionality and intrasentential code-switching: a study of Japanese and Korean Americans’ bilingual speech. In Japanese/Korean linguistics, Vol. 8, ed. Silva, 121–130. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poplack, Shana. 1980. Sometimes I’ll start a conversation in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL: Toward a typology of code switching. Linguistics 18: 581–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, William C., and Tej K. Bhatia. 1999. Code-switching, grammar, and sentence production: The problem of light verbs. In The Development of Second Language Grammars: A Generative Approach, eds. Elaine C. Klein and Gita Martohardjono, 269–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaer, Benjamin. 2003. On the syntactic status of certain fronted adverbials in English. Unpublished manuscript. Berlin: ZAS.

  • Stanlaw, James. 1982. English in Japanese communicative structures. In The other tongue: English across cultures, ed. Braj Kachru. Champagne-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The informational component. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolford, Ellen. 1983. Bilingual code-switching and syntactic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 520–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1997. Dutch syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis López.

Additional information

This research project has been carried out under auspices of the UIC Bilingualism Research Laboratory and we would like to thank the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at UIC for the financial support that made it possible. We would also like to thank Karlos Arregi, Jeff MacSwan, Marcel Den Dikken, and two anonymous reviewers for feedback on previous versions or this article and the audiences that heard various incarnations of this project: Deutsche Romanistentag (Vienna, October 2007), Linguistic Symposium of Romance Languages (Urbana, April 2008), University of Chicago (May 2008), International Symposium on Bilingualism (Utrecht, July 2009), Purdue University (April 2010). Special thanks go to the fellow members of the BRL for their feedback and support. Our gratitude goes as well to our language consultants and to Susanne Müller for providing us with valuable code-switching data. All errors are ours.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González-Vilbazo, K., López, L. Little v and parametric variation. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 30, 33–77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9141-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9141-5

Keywords

Navigation