Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ergative case and the transitive subject: a view from Nez Perce

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ergative case, the special case of transitive subjects, raises questions not only for the theory of case but also for theories of subjecthood and transitivity. This paper analyzes the case system of Nez Perce, a “three-way ergative” language, with an eye towards a formalization of the category of transitive subject. I show that it is object agreement that is determinative of transitivity, and hence of ergative case, in Nez Perce. I further show that the transitivity condition on ergative case must be coupled with a criterion of subjecthood that makes reference to participation in subject agreement, not just to origin in a high argument-structural position. These two results suggest a formalization of the transitive subject as that argument uniquely accessing both high and low agreement information, the former through its (agreement-derived) connection with T and the latter through its origin in the specifier of a head associated with object agreement (v). In view of these findings, I argue that ergative case morphology should be analyzed not as the expression of a syntactic primitive but as the morphological spell-out of subject agreement and object agreement on a nominal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aissen, Judith. 1999. Agent focus and inverse in Tzotzil. Language 75: 451–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, Edith. 2004. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell.

  • Anand, Pranav, and Andrew Nevins. 2006. The locus of ergative case assignment: evidence from scope. In Ergativity: emerging issues, eds. A. Johns, D. Massam, and J. Ndayiragije. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, Haruo. 1970. Nez Perce grammar. University of California publications in linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, Haruo. 1979. Nez Perce texts. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, Haruo. 1994. Nez Perce dictionary. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, Haruo, and Deward Walker. 1989. Nez Perce oral narratives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandhu, Churamani. 1973. Clause patterns in Nepali. In Clause, sentence and discourse patterns in selected languages of Nepal, ed. Austin Hale, Vol. 2, 1–79. Norman: SIL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria. 1987. On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53: 194–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, scope and binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria, and Ken Hale. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Barry J. 1987. Australian aboriginal grammar. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2005. Where’s phi? In Leiden papers in linguistics, ed. Marjo van Koppen.

  • Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John. 2002. Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, J.G. 1976. Wangkumara. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. R.M.W. Dixon, 336–339. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, J.G. 1981. Margany and Gunya. In Handbook of Australian languages, eds. R.M.W. Dixon and Barry J. Blake, Vol. 2, 274–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruening, Benjamin. 2007. On the diagnostics of structural case and the nature of ergative case: a reply to Woolford 2006. University of Delaware.

  • Carnie, Andrew, and Phillip Cash Cash. 2006. Tree-geometric relational hierarchies and Nuumiipuutímt (Nez Perce) case. In Ergativity, eds. A. Johns, D. Massam and J. Ndayiragije, 229–244. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra, and William A. Ladusaw. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language, ed. W.P. Lehman, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, Harold David. 1999. The phonology and morphology of Nez Perce stress. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.

  • Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1971. An introduction to the Nocte language. North-East Frontier Agency.

  • Davis, Henry, and Lisa Matthewson. 2003. Quasi objects in St’át’imcets: on the (semi-)independence of agreement and Case. In Formal approaches to function in grammar in honor of Eloise Jelinek, eds. H. Harley, A. Carnie, and M. Willie, 79–106. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. A semantics for pseudo-incorporation. Semantics Archive.

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2007. Antipassive and indefinite objects in Nez Perce. In Vol. 4 of Proceedings of SULA, ed. A.R. Deal, 35–47. Amherst: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2008a. Ergative and applicative in Warlpiri. University of Massachusetts.

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2008. Property-type objects and modal embedding. In Vol. 12 of Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, ed. Atle Grønn. Oslo: ILOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2009a. Events in space. In Vol. 18 of Proceedings of SALT, eds. T. Friedman and S. Ito, 230–247. Cornell: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2009b. On the origin and content of expletives: evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4).

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2010. Topics in the Nez Perce verb. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Number 69 in Cambridge studies in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David, and Belinda Brodie. 1984. The semantics of “floated” quantifiers in a transformationless grammar. In Vol. 3 of Proceedings of WCCFL, eds. M.T. Wescoat, M. Cobler, and S. MacKaye, 75–90. Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas Donka, and Henriëtte de Swart. 2003. The semantics of incorporation. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeberli, Eric. 2001. Deriving syntactic effects of morphological case by eliminating abstract case. Lingua 111: 279–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20, eds. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. GLOT International 4: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi, and Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, Charles. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmer, Nils M. 1963. On the history and structure of the Australian languages. Lund: Lundequistska Bokhandeln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9: 577–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In The projection of arguments, eds. M. Butt and W. Geuder, 265–307. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon eds. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of SALT VIII. CLC Publications.

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2003. The event argument and the semantics of verbs. Cambridge: MIT Press (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2004. Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In The syntax of time, eds. J. Guéron and J. Lecarme, 389–423. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2005. Building resultatives. In Event arguments: foundations and applications, eds. C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein, 177–212. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 187–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruspe, Nicole. 2004. A grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legate, Julie Anne. 2002. Warlpiri: theoretical implications. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Legate, Julie Anne. 2006. Split absolutive. In Ergativity: emerging issues, eds. Alana Johns, Diane Massam, and Juvenal Ndayiragije, 143–172.

  • Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 55–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In Eastern states conference on linguistics, eds. G. Westphal, B. Ao, and H.-R. Chae, 234–253. Baltimore: University of Maryland, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Thomas. 2004. The position of morphological case in the derivation: a study on the syntax-morphology interface. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Mohanan, Tara. 1995. Wordhood and lexicality: noun incorporation in Hindi. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13: 75–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M.C. 1992. Topics in Northern Pomo grammar. Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. Garland.

  • O’Connor, M.C. 2007. External possession and utterance interpretation: a crosslinguistic exploration. Linguistics 45: 577–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1997. Marathi. Descriptive grammar series. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: a study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Doris and Immanuel Barshi. 1999. External possession: what, where, how, and why. In External possession, eds. Doris Payne, and Immanuel Barshi, 3–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2006. Small nominals. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 433–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: syntactic derivation and interpretation, eds. V. Samiian, S. Karimi, and W. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, Archie. 1934. Nez Percé texts. Columbia university contributions to anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, Christer. 2006. Case as agree marker. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 77: 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Rigsby, Bruce, and Noel Rude. 1996. A sketch of Sahaptin, a Sahaptian language. In Handbook of North American Indians, ed. Ives Goddard, Vol. 17, Languages, 666–692. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in the noun phrase: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Vol. 25 of Syntax and semantics, eds. Stephen Anderson and Susan D. Rothstein, 37–62

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. On the anaphor agreement effect. Rivista di Linguistica 2: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rude, Noel. 1985. Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oregon.

  • Rude, Noel. 1986. Discourse pragmatic context for genitive promotion in Nez Perce. Studies in Language 10: 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rude, Noel. 1992. Word order and topicality in Nez Perce. In Pragmatics of word order flexibility, ed. D. Payne, 193–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rude, Noel. 1997. On the history of nominal case in Sahaptian. International Journal of American Linguistics 63: 113–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rude, Noel. 1999. External possession in Sahaptian. In External possession, eds. D. Payne and I. Barshi, 403–427. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Florian. 2008. Two types of bridging with two types of definites. Presented at Stanford University, February 2008.

  • Strehlow, T.G.H. 1944. Aranda phonetics and grammar. Number 7 in the Oceania monographs. Sydney: The Australian National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. In Vol. 2 of Approaches to Hungarian: theories and analyses, ed. I. Kenesei, 167–191. Szeged: Jozsef Attila University.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Geenhoven, Verle. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, David E. 1973. Clause patterns in Kham. In Clause, sentence and discourse patterns in selected languages of Nepal, ed. Austin Hale, Vol. 1, 39–202. Norman: SIL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharram, Douglas. 2003. On the interpretation of (un)certain indefinites in Inuktitut and related languages. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Woolford, Ellen. 1997. Four-way case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective and accusative. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15: 181–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolford, Ellen. 1999. More on the anaphor agreement effect. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 257–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurm, S.A. 1976. Accusative marking in Duungidjawu (Waga-Waga). In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. R.M.W. Dixon, 106–111. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Moira, Joan Maling, and Ray Jackendoff. 1987. Case in tiers. Language 63: 217–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Thomas Ede. 1992. On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1: 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 226 South College, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA

    Amy Rose Deal

Authors
  1. Amy Rose Deal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Rose Deal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deal, A.R. Ergative case and the transitive subject: a view from Nez Perce. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 28, 73–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9081-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9081-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation