Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unifying first and last conjunct agreement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper investigates first and last conjunct agreement in Serbo-Croatian, the latter being a rather rare phenomenon for head initial languages. The paper gives a uniform account of first and last conjunct agreement based on the operation Agree (Chomsky 2000). The account captures both the contexts where first and last conjunct agreement exhibit parallel behavior and the contexts where the parallelism between the two breaks down. The analysis also captures interaction between gender and number agreement. Given the complexity of the first/last conjunct agreement paradigm in Serbo-Croatian, to the extent that it is successful the analysis presented in the paper provides strong evidence in favor of the operation Agree in general, as well as the particular approach to Agree adopted in the paper. The system developed in the paper allows one instance of uninterpretable features, namely valued uninterpretable features, not to undergo feature checking and does not require uninterpretable features in general to undergo feature checking with interpretable features, differing in these respects from Chomsky (2000, 2001a) and Pesetsky and Torrego (2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abels, Klaus. 2001. The predicate cleft construction in Russian. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Indiana meeting 2000, eds. Steven Franks, Tracy Holloway King, and Michael Yadroff, 1–19. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun, and Dominique Sportiche. 1994. Agreement, word order and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun, and Dominique Sportiche. 1999. Further remarks on first conjunct agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 669–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badecker, William. 2007. A feature principle for partial agreement. Lingua 117: 1541–1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahloud, Maher, and Wayne Herbert. 1993. Agreement asymmetries in Arabic. In Vol. 11 of Proceedings of the west coast conference on formal linguistics, ed. Jonathan Mead, 15–31. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejar, Susana. 2003. Phi-syntax: a theory of agreement. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.

  • Benmamoun, Elabbas. 1992. Functional and inflectional morphology: problems of projection, representation, and derivation. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2002. A-chains at the PF interface: copies and “covert” movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20: 197–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2008. Where’s φ? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-theory: phi-features across modules and interfaces, eds. Daniel Harbour, David Adger, and Susana Bejar, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2003. Intricacies of Icelandic agreement. Manuscript, University of Maryland and Harvard University.

  • Bošković, Željko. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: an economy approach. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2001. On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: cliticization and related phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2002a. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5: 167–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2002b. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2004. On the clitic switch in Greek imperatives. In Balkan syntax and semantics, ed. Olga Mišeska Tomić, 269–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2005a. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2005b. On the locality of Move and Agree: eliminating the activation condition, generalized EPP, inverse case filter, and the phase-impenetrability condition. In Vol. 3 of UConn occasional papers in linguistics. [Distributed by MIT Working Papers. Cambridge: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2007. On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: an even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 589–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2008. On Leo Tolstoy, its structure, case, left-branch extraction, and Prosodic Inversion. Manuscript, University of Connecticut.

  • Bošković, Željko. 2009. Conjunct-sensitive agreement: Serbo-Croatian vs. Russian. In Proceedings of formal description of Slavic languages 7.5, in press.

  • Bošković, Željko, and Jairo Nunes. 2007. The copy theory of movement: a view from PF. In The copy theory of movement on the PF side, eds. Norbert Corver and Jairo Nunes, 13–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, William. 1992. International encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, José. 2003. The structure of coordination: conjunction and agreement phenomena in Spanish and other languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001a. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: a life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001b. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Vol. 20 of MIT working papers in linguistics, 1–28. Cambridge: MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citko, Barbara. 2004. Agreement asymmetries in coordinate structures. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Ottawa meeting 2003, eds. Olga Arnaudova, Wayles Browne, Maria Luisa Rivero, and Danijela Stojanović, 91–108. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, Greville G. 1983. Hierarchies, targets and controllers: agreement patterns in Slavic. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, Greville G. 2002. Types of typology, illustrated from gender systems. In Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe, ed. Frans Plank, 289–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken, Marcel. 2001. “Pluringulars”, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doron, Edit. 2000. VSO and left-conjunct agreement: Biblical Hebrew vs Modern Hebrew. In The syntax of verb initial languages, eds. Andrew Carnie and Eithne Guilfoyle, 75–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Samuel D., and T. Daniel Seely. 1999. SPEC-ifying the GF “subject”; eliminating A-chains and the EPP within a derivational model. Manuscript, University of Michigan and Eastern Michigan.

  • Franck, Julie, Glenda Lassi, Ulrich H. Frauenfelder, and Luigi Rizzi. 2006. Agreement and movement: a syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition 101: 173–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Steven. 1998. Clitics in Slavic. Presented at the comparative Slavic morphosyntax workshop, June 1998, in Spencer, Indiana.

  • Franks, Steven. 2002. A Jakobsonian feature based analysis of the Slavic numeric quantifier genitive. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10: 141–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: agreement and clausal architecture. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Hiramatsu, Kazuko. 2000. Accessing linguistic competence: evidence from children’s and adults’ acceptability judgments. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambova, Mariana. 2002. On A′-movements in Bulgarian and their interaction. The Linguistic Review 18: 327–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambova, Mariana. 2004. On information structure and clausal architecture: evidence from Bulgarian. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Landau, Idan. 2003. Modular recoverability: chain resolution in Hebrew V(P)-fronting. Manuscript, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

  • Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Case and expletives revisited: on Greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 615–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marušič, Franc, Andrew Nevins, and Amanda Saksida. 2007. Last-conjunct agreement in Slovenian. In Proceedings of formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Toronto meeting 2006, eds. Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 210–227. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, Martha. 1998. Locality in A-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Munn, Alan. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.

  • Munn, Alan. 1999. First conjunct agreement: against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 669–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, eds. Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky, Maria. 2009. What agreement can do for you: first and last conjunct agreement in Tsez. Presented at the special session on languages of the Caucasus at the annual LSA meeting, in San Francisco.

  • Reglero, Lara. 2004. On A’ dependencies in Spanish and Basque. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Rezac, Milan. 2004. Elements of cyclic agree. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.

  • Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: agree and differential object marking. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Sauerland, Uli. 2003. A new semantics for number. In Vol. 13 of Proceedings of SALT, 258–275. Ithaca: Cornell University, CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, Uli. 2004. A comprehensive semantics for agreement. Manuscript, Universität Tübingen.

  • Sobin, Nicholas. 1994. Non-local agreement. Manuscript, University of Arkansas at Little Rock.

  • Soltan, Usama. 2007. On agree and postcyclic merge in syntactic derivations: first conjunct agreement in Standard Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XIX: papers from the nineteenth annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, Urbana, Illinois, April 2005, ed. Elabbas Benmamoun, 175–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjepanović, Sandra. 1998. Scrambling in Serbo-Croatian. Manuscript, University of Connecticut.

  • Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

  • Stjepanović, Sandra. 2003. A word-order paradox resolved by copy deletion at PF. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3: 139–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Koppen, Marjo. 2005. One probe—two goals: aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, U-1145, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA

    Željko Bošković

Authors
  1. Željko Bošković
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Željko Bošković.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bošković, Ž. Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 27, 455–496 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9072-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9072-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation