Skip to main content
Log in

Bare nominals and reference to capacities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This paper concentrates on the syntax and semantics of bare nominals in Germanic and Romance languages. These languages do not normally allow nominals to occur without an article. However, some syntactic configurations, including predicative constructions, supplementives and some prepositional phrases, allow bareness of certain nominals. We argue that bare nominals in these constructions refer to capacities: professions, religions, nationalities or other roles in society. Capacities are analyzed as entities of type e, sortally distinct from regular individuals as well as kinds. We further argue that the capacity interpretation is associated with NP—a layer within the DP that lacks number features. This accounts for the number-neutral status of bare nominals. We also show some patterns in languages other than Romance and Germanic that provide further cross-linguistic support for the postulation of capacities as a separate ontological category, specific to a low position within the DP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan R., Holmes P., Lundskær-Nielsen T. (1995). Danish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik J. (1995). Morpho-syntax:  the syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthen, K. (2003). Norwegian bare singulars. doctoral thesis, Trondheim.

  • Broekhuis, H., Keizer, E., & den Dikken, M. (2003). Nouns and noun phrases, Modern grammar of Dutch. Occasional papers 4, Tilburg.

  • Butt J., Benjamin C. (1988). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. (1980). Reference to kinds in English. New York: Garland. [Appeared in 1977 as a Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Reproduced by the IULC, Bloomington.]

  • Chierchia G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayal V. (2004). Number marking and indefinites in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(4): 393–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken M. (2006). Relations and linkers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Déprez, V. (2001). On the nature of Haitian bare NPs. In: D. Cresti, C. Tortora, & T. Satterfield (Eds.), Current issues in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 29th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Déprez V. (2005). Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua 115, 857–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doron E. (2004). Bare singular reference to kinds. In: Young R., Zhou Y. (eds). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY, pp. 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel U. (1996). Deutsche grammatik. Julius Groos Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas D., de Swart H. (2003). The semantics of incorporation. CSLI Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D. & de Swart, H. (2006). Article choice in plural generics. To appear in Lingua.

  • Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M.C. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (2nd edn.). Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff uitgevers/Wolters Plantyn.

  • Holmes P., Hinchliffe I. (1994). Swedish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka M. (2004). Bare NPs: kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither?. In: Young R., Zhou Y. (eds). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY, pp. 180–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Link G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice theoretical approach. In: Bauerle R., Schwarze C., von Stechow A. (eds). Meaning, use and interpretation of language. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiden M., Robustelli C. (2000). A reference grammar of modern Italian. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Matushansky, O., & Spector, B. (2005). Tinker, tailor, soldier, spy. In E. Maier, C. Bary & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 9 (pp. 241–255). Nijmegen: NCS.

  • McNally, L., & Boleda Torrent, G. (2004). Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. In P. Cabredo-Hofherr & O. Bonami (Eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 5 (pp. 179–196). Paris: CNRS.

  • Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophy, selected papers of Richard Montague, R. Thomason (Ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Munn A., Schmitt C. (2005). Number and indefinites. Lingua 115, 821–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Pompilus, P. (1976). Contribution à l’étude comparée du créole et du français: morphologie et syntaxe. Port-au-Prince: Edition Caraibes.

  • Ritter, E. (1991). Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In: Rothstein S. (eds). Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing, Syntax and Semantics 25 (pp. 37–62). New York: Academic Press.

  • Roodenburg J. (2004a). French bare arguments are not extinct: the case of coordinated bare nouns. Linguistic Inquiry 35(2): 301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodenburg, J. (2004b). Pour une approche scalaire de la déficience nominale: la position du français dans une théorie des “noms nus”. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam/Paris 8.

  • Strandskogen Á.-B., Strandskogen R. (1986). Norwegian: an essential grammar. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, H., Winter, Y., Zwarts, J. (2005). Bare predicate nominals in Dutch. In E. Maier, C. Bary, & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9 (pp. 446–460). Nijmegen: NCS.

  • de Swart, & Zwarts, J. (2006). Less form, more meaning: why bare nominals are special. MS., Nias/Utrecht/Nijmegen.

  • Zamparelli, R. (1996). Layers in the determiner phrase. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.

  • Zamparelli, R., (Ed). (2005a). The structure of (in)definiteness: issues in the form and interpretation of noun phrases. special issue of Lingua, 115(6).

  • Zamparelli R. (2005b). Introduction: some questions about (in)definiteness. Lingua 115, 759–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann E. (1993). On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1, 149–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henriëtte de Swart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Swart, H., Winter, Y. & Zwarts, J. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 25, 195–222 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4

Keywords

Navigation