This paper concentrates on the syntax and semantics of bare nominals in Germanic and Romance languages. These languages do not normally allow nominals to occur without an article. However, some syntactic configurations, including predicative constructions, supplementives and some prepositional phrases, allow bareness of certain nominals. We argue that bare nominals in these constructions refer to capacities: professions, religions, nationalities or other roles in society. Capacities are analyzed as entities of type e, sortally distinct from regular individuals as well as kinds. We further argue that the capacity interpretation is associated with NP—a layer within the DP that lacks number features. This accounts for the number-neutral status of bare nominals. We also show some patterns in languages other than Romance and Germanic that provide further cross-linguistic support for the postulation of capacities as a separate ontological category, specific to a low position within the DP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan R., Holmes P., Lundskær-Nielsen T. (1995). Danish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge, London and New York
Bobaljik J. (1995). Morpho-syntax: the syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA
Borthen, K. (2003). Norwegian bare singulars. doctoral thesis, Trondheim.
Broekhuis, H., Keizer, E., & den Dikken, M. (2003). Nouns and noun phrases, Modern grammar of Dutch. Occasional papers 4, Tilburg.
Butt J., Benjamin C. (1988). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. Arnold, London
Carlson, G. (1980). Reference to kinds in English. New York: Garland. [Appeared in 1977 as a Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Reproduced by the IULC, Bloomington.]
Chierchia G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405
Dayal V. (2004). Number marking and indefinites in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(4): 393–450
den Dikken M. (2006). Relations and linkers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Déprez, V. (2001). On the nature of Haitian bare NPs. In: D. Cresti, C. Tortora, & T. Satterfield (Eds.), Current issues in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 29th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Déprez V. (2005). Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua 115, 857–883
Doron E. (2004). Bare singular reference to kinds. In: Young R., Zhou Y. (eds). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY, pp. 73–90
Engel U. (1996). Deutsche grammatik. Julius Groos Verlag, Heidelberg
Farkas D., de Swart H. (2003). The semantics of incorporation. CSLI Publications, Stanford
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H. (2006). Article choice in plural generics. To appear in Lingua.
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M.C. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (2nd edn.). Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff uitgevers/Wolters Plantyn.
Holmes P., Hinchliffe I. (1994). Swedish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge, London and New York
Krifka M. (2004). Bare NPs: kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither?. In: Young R., Zhou Y. (eds). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY, pp. 180–203
Link G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice theoretical approach. In: Bauerle R., Schwarze C., von Stechow A. (eds). Meaning, use and interpretation of language. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323
Maiden M., Robustelli C. (2000). A reference grammar of modern Italian. Arnold, London
Matushansky, O., & Spector, B. (2005). Tinker, tailor, soldier, spy. In E. Maier, C. Bary & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 9 (pp. 241–255). Nijmegen: NCS.
McNally, L., & Boleda Torrent, G. (2004). Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. In P. Cabredo-Hofherr & O. Bonami (Eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 5 (pp. 179–196). Paris: CNRS.
Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophy, selected papers of Richard Montague, R. Thomason (Ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Munn A., Schmitt C. (2005). Number and indefinites. Lingua 115, 821–855
Partee, B. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris.
Pompilus, P. (1976). Contribution à l’étude comparée du créole et du français: morphologie et syntaxe. Port-au-Prince: Edition Caraibes.
Ritter, E. (1991). Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In: Rothstein S. (eds). Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing, Syntax and Semantics 25 (pp. 37–62). New York: Academic Press.
Roodenburg J. (2004a). French bare arguments are not extinct: the case of coordinated bare nouns. Linguistic Inquiry 35(2): 301–313
Roodenburg, J. (2004b). Pour une approche scalaire de la déficience nominale: la position du français dans une théorie des “noms nus”. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam/Paris 8.
Strandskogen Á.-B., Strandskogen R. (1986). Norwegian: an essential grammar. Routledge, London and New York
de Swart, H., Winter, Y., Zwarts, J. (2005). Bare predicate nominals in Dutch. In E. Maier, C. Bary, & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9 (pp. 446–460). Nijmegen: NCS.
de Swart, & Zwarts, J. (2006). Less form, more meaning: why bare nominals are special. MS., Nias/Utrecht/Nijmegen.
Zamparelli, R. (1996). Layers in the determiner phrase. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.
Zamparelli, R., (Ed). (2005a). The structure of (in)definiteness: issues in the form and interpretation of noun phrases. special issue of Lingua, 115(6).
Zamparelli R. (2005b). Introduction: some questions about (in)definiteness. Lingua 115, 759–766
Zimmermann E. (1993). On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1, 149–179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Swart, H., Winter, Y. & Zwarts, J. Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 25, 195–222 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4