Skip to main content
Log in

Clinicopathological and Radiological Features of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Eosinophilic Mucin in Chungcheong Province of Korea

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with eosinophilic mucin is considered rare in Korea. The object of this study was to categorize CRS patients with eosinophilic mucin into several groups and compared the groups based on their clinicopathological and radiological features.

Methods

In total, 105 CRS patients with eosinophilic mucin from four tertiary medical centers which are located at Chungcheong province of Korea were included for this study. The patients were divided into four groups for analysis, based on the presence or absence of an allergy (A) to a fungus or fungal element (F) in the mucin. The following were the four groups: allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS, A+F+), AFRS-like sinusitis (A+F−), eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis (EFRS, A−F+), and eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis (EMRS, A−F−). Their clinical manifestation, the presence of associated disease, radiological finding, treatment, and treatment outcome were reviewed and compared.

Results

There were no patients in the AFRS-like sinusitis group, 47 patients were assigned to the AFRS group, 27 to the EFRS group, and 41 to the EMRS group. Patients of AFRS group showed a significantly higher association with allergic rhinitis than did the other groups. The mean total serum IgE level in the AFRS patients was significantly higher than in the EFRS and EMRS patients. In the AFRS group and EFRS group, 67.6% and 74.1% had unilateral disease, respectively, in contrast to the EMRS group (4.9%). The mean Hounsfield unit values of the area of high attenuation in the AFRS patients were significantly higher than those in the other groups.

Conclusions

Significant clinicopathological differences existed among the subgroups of CRS with eosinophilic mucin. AFRS tends to be an allergic response to colonizing fungi in atopic individuals. In EFRS, local allergies to fungi might play a role in the disease. EMRS is thought to be unconnected with fungal allergies, and it showed different form compared with the AFRS and EFRS groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Millar JWJA, Lamb D. Allergic aspergillosis of the maxillary sinuses. Thorax. 1981;36:710.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katzenstein AL, Sale SR, Greenberger PA. Allergic Aspergillus sinusitis: a newly recognized form of sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983;72(1):89–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cody DT 2nd, Neel HB 3rd, Ferreiro JA, Roberts GD. Allergic fungal sinusitis: the Mayo Clinic experience. Laryngoscope. 1994;104(9):1074–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bent JP 3rd, Kuhn FA. Diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;111(5):580–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Allphin AL, Strauss M, Abdul-Karim FW. Allergic fungal sinusitis: problems in diagnosis and treatment. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(8):815–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramadan HH, Quraishi HA. Allergic mucin sinusitis without fungus. Am J Rhinol. 1997;11(2):145–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferguson BJ. Eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis: a distinct clinicopathological entity. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(5 Pt 1):799–813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins M, Nair S, Smith W, Kette F, Gillis D, Wormald PJ. Role of local immunoglobulin E production in the pathophysiology of noninvasive fungal sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(7):1242–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carney AS, Tan LW, Adams D, Varelias A, Ooi EH, Wormald PJ. Th2 immunological inflammation in allergic fungal sinusitis, nonallergic eosinophilic fungal sinusitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 2006;20(2):145–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, Homburger HA, Frigas E, Gaffey TA, et al. The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74(9):877–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uri N, Ronen O, Marshak T, Parpara O, Nashashibi M, Gruber M. Allergic fungal sinusitis and eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis: diagnostic criteria. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127(9):867–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saravanan K, Panda NK, Chakrabarti A, Das A, Bapuraj RJ. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: an attempt to resolve the diagnostic dilemma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132(2):173–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chakrabarti A, Denning DW, Ferguson BJ, Ponikau J, Buzina W, Kita H, et al. Fungal rhinosinusitis: a categorization and definitional schema addressing current controversies. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(9):1809–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JW, Hong SL, Kim YK, Lee CH, Min YG, Rhee CS. Histological and immunological features of non-eosinophilic nasal polyps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(6):925–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Braun H, Buzina W, Freudenschuss K, Beham A, Stammberger H. ‘Eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis’: a common disorder in Europe? Laryngoscope. 2003;113(2):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferreiro JA, Carlson BA, Cody DT 3rd. Paranasal sinus fungus balls. Head Neck. 1997;19(6):481–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoyt AE, Borish L, Gurrola J, Payne S. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(4):599–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu-Myers Y, Deal AM, Miller JD, Thorp BD, Sreenath SB, McClurg SM, et al. Comparison of socioeconomic and demographic factors in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(1):137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller JD, Deal AM, McKinney KA, McClurg SW, Rodriguez KD, Thorp BD, et al. Markers of disease severity and socioeconomic factors in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(4):272–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marple BF. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: current theories and management strategies. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(6):1006–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SH, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Yoon YH, Kim YM, Rha KS. Categorization and clinicopathological features of chronic rhinosinusitis with eosinophilic mucin in a korean population. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;8(1):39–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wise SK, Rogers GA, Ghegan MD, Harvey RJ, Delgaudio JM, Schlosser RJ. Radiologic staging system for allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(5):735–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lara JF, Gomez JD. Allergic mucin with and without fungus: a comparative clinicopathologic analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125(11):1442–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reddy CE, Gupta AK, Singh P, Mann SB. Imaging of granulomatous and chronic invasive fungal sinusitis: comparison with allergic fungal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143(2):294–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Malat J, Curtin HD, Epstein JI, Huff LC, et al. Fungal sinusitis: diagnosis with CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;169(2):439–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marple BF, Mabry RL. Comprehensive management of allergic fungal sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 1998;12(4):263–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marple BF. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: surgical management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2000;33(2):409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferguson BJ. What role do systemic corticosteroids, immunotherapy, and antifungal drugs play in the therapy of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(10):1174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ki Sang Rha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling Editor: Vishnu Chaturvedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, S.K., Park, K.W., Mo, JH. et al. Clinicopathological and Radiological Features of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Eosinophilic Mucin in Chungcheong Province of Korea. Mycopathologia 184, 423–431 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-019-00340-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-019-00340-z

Keywords

Navigation