Abstract
With rising demand to develop versatile composite materials for modern applications, computer-based solutions to arrive at the material characteristics are now preferred. This necessity is due to the large cost involved for the nanoadditives, as well as elaborate and precise setups required for detailed load tests or experiments. Even with the numerical simulations, considerable information has to arrive from experiments for these highly nonlinear viscoelastic materials. Stress accumulation and relaxation are important aspects that need prediction before considering composites for applications. Being a relatively new engineering domain, the significant information to use commercial codes like Ansys®, MSC®, or Abaqus® are now scattered in literature and the solvers themselves are still evolving. Our attempt through this work is to provide a comprehensive basic set of information on the same, while using Ansys® for arriving at the material characteristics of Thermoplastic Polyurethane-Carbon Nanotube (TPU-CNT) polymer composite. A simulation procedure to study stress relaxation behavior with Maxwell’s Prony relaxation parameters is detailed, suitability of incorporating basic hyperelastic models, such as Mooney–Rivlin and Ogden available in the solver, is compared, and the influence of coefficient of friction (COF) in the numerical simulations is investigated. On appropriate validation with available experimental results, we found that hyper-viscoelastic model is best suited for TPU-CNT with maximum error as low as 5% during stress relaxation phase (for 1800 s), in comparison with 15% and 25% for viscoelastic and hyperelastic models. During the short loading phase of the material, none of the models are accurate. The two-parameter first-order equation-based Mooney–Rivlin model fed with uniaxial load test information was satisfactory for low strain predictions in comparison with higher-order Ogden model. COF is found to significantly affect the solution, and a value of about 0.3 was found suitable for the present 0.05% TPU-CNT composite. Further, we present the transient stress contours to show how the stress relaxation within the composite material would be predicted with each model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data to the present work is available with the data repository of the research group. It can be shared and made available to the reviewers on request.
References
ANSYS Learning Hub: https://www.ansys.com/services/ansys-learning-hub. Accessed 05-07-2021
Aurilia, M., Piscitelli, F., Sorrentino, L., Lavorgna, M., Iannace, S.: Detailed analysis of dynamic mechanical properties of TPU nanocomposite: the role of the interfaces. Eur. Polym. J. 47(5), 925–936 (2011)
Avalle, M., Romanello, E.: Tribological characterization of modified polymeric blends. Proc. Struct. Integr. 8, 239–255 (2018). ISSN 2452-3216
Bower, A.F.: Applied Mechanics of Solids. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
Dilibal, S., Sahin, H., Celik, Y.: Experimental and numerical analysis on the bending response of the geometrically gradient soft robotics actuator. Arch. Mech. 70(5), 391–404 (2018)
Fazekas, B., Goda, T.J.: Determination of the hyper-viscoelastic model parameters of open-cell polymer foams and rubber-like materials with high accuracy. Mater. Des. 156, 596–608 (2018)
Ferry, J.D.: Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. Wiley, New York (1980)
Goh, S.M., Charalambides, M.N., Williams, J.G.: Determination of the constitutive constants of non-linear viscoelastic materials. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 8(3), 255–268 (2004)
Gu, S., Yan, B., Liu, L., Ren, J.: Carbon nanotube–polyurethane shape memory nanocomposites with low trigger temperature. Eur. Polym. J. 49(12), 3867–3877 (2013)
Guo, S., Zhang, C., Wang, W., Liu, T., Tjiu, W.C., He, C., Zhang, W.-D.: Preparation and characterization of polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 16(8), 501–507 (2008)
Holzapfel, G.A.: On large strain viscoelasticity: continuum formulation and finite element applications to elastomeric structures. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 39(22), 3903–3926 (1996)
Jyoti, J., Singh, B.P., Rajput, S., Singh, V.N., Dhakate, S.R.: Detailed dynamic rheological studies of multiwall carbon nanotube-reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene composite. J. Mater. Sci. 51(5), 2643–2652 (2016)
Keerthiwansa, G.W.R., Javořík, J., Kledrowetz, J., Nekoksa, P.: Elastomer testing: the risk of using only uniaxial data for fitting the Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic-material model. Mater. Tehnol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2017.085
Lakes, R.S.: Viscoelastic measurement techniques. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75(4), 797–810 (2004)
Mansour, G., Tsongas, K., Tzetzis, D., Tzikaset, K.: Dynamic mechanical characterization of polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotube composite thermoplastic elastomers. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 56(14), 1505–1515 (2017)
Mofidi, M.: Tribology of elastomers. PhD thesis, Luleå tekniska universitet (2007)
Pawlikowski, M.: Non-linear approach in hyper-viscoelastic constitutive modelling of polyurethane nanocomposite. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 18(1), 1–20 (2014)
Ryszkowska, J., Jurczyk-Kowalska, M., Szymborski, T.: Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in polyurethane matrix. Physica E 39, 124–127 (2007)
Simo, J.C.: On a fully three-dimensional finite-strain viscoelastic damage model: formulation and computational aspects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 60(2), 153–173 (1987)
Sun, W., Yuan, Y.-X.: Optimization Theory and Methods: Nonlinear Programming, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin (2006)
TA Instruments: Application of Time-Temperature Superposition Principles to DMA. Thermal Analysis Application Brief (last accessed 2022). https://www.tainstruments.com/pdf/literature/TA144.pdf (last modified 2017-09-06 20:08)
Tapia-Romero, M.A., Dehonor-Gómez, M., Lugo-Uribe, L.E.: Prony series calculation for viscoelastic behavior modeling of structural adhesives from DMA data. Ing. Investig. Tecnol. 21(2), 1–10 (2020)
Taylor, R.L., Pister, K.S., Goudreau, G.L.: Thermomechanical analysis of viscoelastic solids. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2(1), 45–59 (1970)
Wex, C., et al.: Isotropic incompressible hyperelastic models for modelling the mechanical behaviour of biological tissues: a review. Biomed. Eng., Biomed. Tech. 60(6), 577–592 (2015)
Wu, Y., Wang, H., Li, A.: Parameter identification methods for hyperelastic and hyper-viscoelastic models. Appl. Sci. 6(12), 386 (2016)
Acknowledgements
We thank the Ansys® support team for engaging in technical discussions throughout the course of the present research. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Raj, G.B., Saludheen, A., Arumugham-Achari, A.K. et al. Simulations for mechanical properties of polymer composites: investigations into suitability of numerical models for TPU-CNT with Mooney–Rivlin (\(N = 1\)) and friction. Mech Time-Depend Mater 27, 705–726 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-022-09565-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-022-09565-w