Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Application of machine learning model optimized by improved sparrow search algorithm in water quality index time series prediction

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water quality index is an important indicator to evaluate the water quality of rivers. Machine learning models have been widely used in the task of water quality index prediction, but the problem of model parameter optimization still has not been effectively solved, which seriously affects the prediction accuracy and the applicability of the model. In recent years, a variety of intelligent optimization algorithms have been applied to solve model parameter optimization problems. For example, Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), etc. However, the existing optimization algorithm has limited optimization capability and still needs further improvement so as to enhance the optimization capability. In this paper, we improve the standard sparrow search algorithm. The improved sparrow search algorithm (IMSSA) uses Tent chaotic sequences to initialize the sparrow population, thus increasing the population diversity; we add adaptive inertia weights and random inertia weights to the SSA, while incorporating the simulated annealing algorithm for optimization, which improves the search performance, convergence accuracy and the ability to jump out of local optimal solutions. We compare the IMSSA with other advanced optimization algorithms on several common test functions, and the results show that the algorithm outperforms other algorithms in terms of convergence accuracy and merit-seeking ability. Meanwhile, we used the IMSSA to optimize the parameters of support vector regression (SVR) and random forest regression (RFR) models to obtain two water quality index prediction models, IMSSA-SVR and IMSSA-RFR, and applied the models to river dissolved oxygen and permanganate index prediction. The experiments show that our model effectively improves the prediction accuracy of river water quality index and has strong practicality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Algorithm 1
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Antanasijevic D, Pocajt V, Peric-Grujic’ A, Ristic’ M (2020) Multilevel split of high-dimensional water quality data using artificial neural networks for the prediction of dissolved oxygen in the Danube River. Neural Comput Appl 32:3957–3966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04079-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asadollah SBHS, Sharafati A, Motta D, Yaseen ZM (2020) River water quality index prediction and uncertainty analysis: a comparative study of machine learning models. J Environ Chem Eng 9:104599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bi J, Lin Y, Dong Q, Yuan H, Zhou MC (2021) Large-scale water quality prediction with integrated deep neural network. Inf Sci 571:191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.057

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen W, Hasanipana M, Rad HN et al (2021) A new design of evolutionary hybrid optimization of SVR model in predicting the blast-induced ground vibration. Eng Comput 37:1455–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00895-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Z, Yang C, Qiao J (2022) The optimal design and application of LSTM neural network based on the hybrid coding PSO algorithm. J Supercomput 78:7227–7259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04142-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demir FB, Tuncer T, Kocamaz AF (2020) A chaotic optimization method based on logistic-sine map for numerical function optimization. Neural Comput & Applic 32:14227–14239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04815-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng B, Xu J, Zhang Y, Lin Y (2021) Multi-step traffic speed prediction based on ensemble learning on an urban road network. Appl Sci 11:4423. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta P, Bhagat S, Saini DK, Kumar A, Alahmadi M et al (2022) Hybrid whale optimization algorithm for resource optimization in cloud e-healthcare applications. Comput Mater Continua 71(3):5659–5676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu Z, Zhang Y, Zhao Y et al. (2019) A water quality prediction method based on the deep LSTM network considering correlation in smart Mariculture. Sens https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061420

  10. Huo F, Wang Y, Ren W (2022) Improved artificial bee colony algorithm and its application in image threshold segmentation. Multimed Tools Appl 81:2189–2212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11644-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jianhua L, Zhiheng W (2021) A hybrid sparrow search algorithm based on constructing similarity. IEEE Access 9:117581–117595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03365-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee J, Perkins D (2020) A simulated annealing algorithm with a dual perturbation method for clustering. Pattern Recogn 112:107713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Xingjia, Jinan Gu, Xiaohong Sun et al. (2021) Parameter identification of robot manipulators with unknown payloads using an improved chaotic sparrow search algorithm. Appl Intell https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02972-5

  14. Li X, Ma X, Xiao F, Xiao C, Wang F, Zhang S (2022) Time-series production forecasting method based on the integration of bidirectional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) network and sparrow search algorithm (SSA). J Pet Sci Eng 208:109309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin JC-W, Djenouri Y, Srivastava G et al (2021) A predictive GA-based model for closed high-utility itemset mining. Appl Soft Comput 108:107422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin JCW, Djenouri Y, Srivastava G et al (2022) Efficient evolutionary computation model of closed high-utility itemset mining. Appl Intell 52:10604–10616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-03134-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu G, Shu C, Liang Z et al (2021) A modified sparrow search algorithm with application in 3d route planning for UAV. Sens 21:1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Longqin X, Liu S (2013) Study of short-term water quality prediction model based on wavelet neural network. Math Comput Model 58(3–4):807–813

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ma B et al (2021) Enhanced sparrow search algorithm with mutation strategy for global optimization. IEEE Access 9:159218–159261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Noori N, Kalin L, Isik S (2020) Water quality prediction using SWAT-ANN coupled approach. J Hydrol 590:125220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nouraki A, Alavi M, Golabi M, Albaji M (2021) Prediction of water quality parameters using machine learning models: a case study of the Karun River. Iran Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:57060–57072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14560-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng Wang Y, Zhang HY (2021) Research on economic optimization of microgrid cluster based on Chaos sparrow search algorithm. Comput Intell Neurosci 3:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5556780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pham A-D, Ngo N-T et al (2020) Hybrid machine learning for predicting strength of sustainable concrete. Soft Comput 24:14965–14980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04848-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ribeiro F, Gradvohl ALS (2021) Machine learning techniques applied to solar flares forecasting. Astronom Comput 35:100468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahu AK (2021) A logistic map based blind and fragile watermarking for tamper detection and localization in images. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03365-9

  26. Shah MI, Abunama T, Javed MF et al (2021) Modeling surface water quality using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system aided by input optimization. Sustain 13:4576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shang Z, He Z, Song Y, Yang Y, Li L, Chen Y (2020) A novel combined model for short-term electric load forecasting based on whale optimization algorithm. Neural Process Lett 52:1207–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-020-10300-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shao Y et al (2023) Multi-objective neural evolutionary algorithm for combinatorial optimization problems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 34(4):2133–2143. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3105937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Siyu C, Guohua F, Xianfeng H et al (2020) Water quality prediction model of a water diversion project based on the improved artificial bee Colony-backpropagation neural network. Water 10(9):806. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasua PN, Srinivasa Raoa T, Dicu AM et al (2020) A comparative review of optimisation techniques in segmentation of brain MR images. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38:6031–6043. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tiwari D, Bhati BS, Al-Turjman F, Nagpal B (2021) Pandemic coronavirus disease (Covid-19): world effects analysis and prediction using machine-learning techniques. Expert Syst https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12714

  32. Xu J, Xu Z, Kuang J, Lin C, Xiao L, Huang X, Zhang Y (2021) An Alternative to Laboratory Testing:Random Forest-Based Water Quality Prediction Framework for Inland and Nearshore Water Bodies. Water 13(22):3262. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13223262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xue J, Shen B (2020) A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Syst Sci Control Eng 8(1):22–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2019.1708830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zaqoot HA, Hamada M, Miqdad S (2018) A comparative study of Ann for predicting nitrate concentration in groundwater Wells in the southern area of Gaza strip. Appl Artif Intell 32(7–8):727–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2018.1506970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang C, Ding S (2021) A stochastic configuration network based on chaotic sparrow search algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 220:106924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu Y, Yousefi N (2021) Optimal parameter identification of PEMFC stacks using adaptive sparrow search algorithm. Int J Hydrog Energy 46:9541–9552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Special Project (NO. 2018ZX07601001), the Special project of guiding local science and technology development by the central government of Liaoning Province (NO. 2021010211-JH6/105).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shenyang institute of computing technology, Chinese academy of sciences, Shenyang, 110168, China

    Yankun Hu, Li Lyu, Ning Wang, XiaoLei Zhou & Meng Fang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yankun Hu, Li Lyu, Ning Wang, XiaoLei Zhou & Meng Fang

Authors
  1. Yankun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li Lyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ning Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. XiaoLei Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meng Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ning Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Lyu, L., Wang, N. et al. Application of machine learning model optimized by improved sparrow search algorithm in water quality index time series prediction. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 16097–16120 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16219-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16219-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation