Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnosis system for cancer disease using a single setting approach

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the diagnosis system of cancer disease using a single setting framework. Most of the radiologists and image specialists are identifying the disease in naked eye. When many conventional systems are used to assess or see a patient’s disorder condition, it rarely detects the disease all at once in certain situations. Patients are facing difficulties, when the condition of disease is increasing. Thus, this paper focusses the condition of patient seeing the disease image and developed a single setting framework using a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture with the help of deep learning approaches. The framework contains several deep learning strategies which are used to determine the patient’s relevant illness through affected image, such as mass detection using You-Only-Look-Once (YOLO) approach and the crucial aspect of segmentation by full resolution convolutional networks (FrCN). In last the CNN model is considered for classification. This paper is considered to implement our model using breast cancer disease. The different classifiers and cross-validation tests are taken for evaluating validation matrix items. Comparisons of the existing model with the proposed model are made for improving the diagnosis system. For example, the method Inception V3 for accuracy and AUC are 86.77 and 85.89 on MIAS database whereas proposed model got 99.54 and 98.85 on same evaluation items. Our findings show that the proposed diagnostic model outperforms on conventional detection, segmentation, and classification methods. Thus, our diagnosis process worked much better using deep learning and suggested approaches which will help and facilitate the diagnosis of each contaminated region. In each stage of image processing of the infected region, the suggested diagnostics method could support radiologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1:
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The code is available from the first author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. (Online) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion_matrix 2021

  2. Alam N, Oliver A, Denton ER, Zwiggelaar R (2018) Automatic segmentation of microcalcification clusters. Annual conference on medical image understanding and analysis, vol 894. Springer, Cham, pp 251–261

  3. Al-antari MA, Al-masni MA, Park SU, Park JH, Kadah YM, Han SM, Kim T-S (2016) Automatic computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digital mammograms via deep belief network. Global conference on engineering and applied science (GCEAS), Japan, pp 1306–1314

  4. Al-antari MA, Al-masni MA, Park SU, Park JH, Metwally MK, Kadah YM, Han SM, Kim T-S (2017) An automatic computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer in digital mammograms via deep belief network. J Med Biol Eng 38(3):443–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-017-0321-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-antari MA, Al-masni MA, Kadah YM (2017) Hybrid model of computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis from digital mammograms. J Sci Eng 04(2):114–126

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-antari MA, Al-masni MA, Choi M-T, Han S-M, Kim T-S (2018) A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification. Int J Med Inform 117:44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-masni M, Al-antari M, Park J, Gi G, Kim T, Rivera P, Valarezo E, Han S-M, Kim T-s (2017) Detection and classification of the breast abnormalities in digital mammograms via regional convolutional neural network. 39th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC’17), Jeju Island, South Korea, pp 1230–1236

  8. Al-masni MA, Al-antari M, Park J-mP, Gi G, Kim T-YK, Rivera P, Valarezo E, Choi M-T, Han S-M, Kim T-S (2018) Simultaneous detection and classification of breast masses in digital mammograms via a deep learning YOLO-based CAD system. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 157:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arevalo J, González FA, Ramos-Pollán R, Oliveira JL, Lopezd MAG (2016) Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 127:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arya N, Saha S (2022) Multi-modal classification for human breast Cancer prognosis prediction: proposal of deep-learning based stacked ensemble model. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 19(2):1032–1041

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ayelet A-B, Karlinsky L, Alpert S, Hasoul S, Ben-Ari R, Barkan E (2016) A region based convolutional network for tumor detection and classification in breast mammography. International workshop on large-scale annotation of biomedical data and expert label synthesis. Springer International Publishing, Athens, pp 197–205

  12. Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, Cipoll R (2016) SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. In: arXiv preprintarXiv:1511.00561, pp 2481–2495

  13. Ball J, Bruce L (2007) Digital mammographic computer aided diagnosis (CAD) using adaptive level set segmentation. 29th annual international conference of the IEEE(EMBS), pp 4973–4978

  14. Bhuyan HK, Chakraborty C (2022) Explainable machine learning for data extraction across computational social system. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst:1–15. Early Access

  15. Bhuyan HK, Kamila NK (2015) Privacy preserving sub-feature selection in distributed data mining. Appl Soft Comput 36:552–569. Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhuyan HK, Pani SK (2022) Impact of world pandemic “COVID-19” and an assessment of world health management and economics, IET, Book: the internet of medical things: enabling technologies and emerging applications (healthcare technologies), pp 55–92

  17. Bhuyan HK, Ravi VK (2021) Analysis of sub-feature for classification in data mining. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management:1–15. Early Published

  18. Bhuyan HK, Dash SK, Roy S, Swain DK (2012) Privacy preservation with penalty in decentralized network using multiparty computation. Int J Adv Comput Technol (IJACT) 4(1):297–303

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bhuyan HK, Kamila NK, Jena LD (2016) Pareto-based multi-objective optimization for classification in data mining. Cluster Comput 19(4):1723–1745. Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhuyan HK, Chakraborty C, Pani SK, Ravi VK (2021) Feature and sub-feature selection for classification using correlation coefficient and fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Eng Manag:1–15. Early Access

  21. Bhuyan HK, Chakraborty C, Shelke Y, Pani SK (2021) COVID-19 diagnosis system by deep learning approaches. Expert Syst 39(3):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bhuyan HK, Kamila NK, Pani SK (2021) Individual privacy in data mining using fuzzy optimization. Eng Optim:1–19 . Early Access

  23. Bhuyan HK, Biswajit B, Nyamathulla S, Mohapatra SK (2022) Structured ranking method-based feature selection in data mining. International conference on emerging smart computing and informatics (ESCI), pp 1–6

  24. Bishop C (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 1–729

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Cardoso JS, Domingues I, Oliveira HP (2015) Closed shortest path in the originalcoordinates with an application to breast cancer. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 29(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carneiro G, Nascimento J, Bradley AP (2017) Automated analysis of unregistered multi-view mammograms with deep learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(11):2355–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chollet F, Keras (2017) The Python Deep Learning Library, [Online]. Available: MIT, (Accessed 10, 2017), https://keras.io/

  28. Dankwa-Mullan I, Rivo M, Sepulveda M, Park Y, Snowdon J, Rhee K (2019) Transforming diabetes care through artificial intelligence: the future is here. Popul Health Manag 22(3):229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dhungel N, Carneiro G, Bradley AP (2015) Automated mass detection in mammograms using cascaded deep learning and random forests. International conference on digital image computing: techniques and applications (DICTA), Australia, pp 1–6

  30. Dhungel N, Carneiro G, Bradley AP (2015) Deep structured learning for mass segmentation from mammograms. Image processing (ICIP), 2015 IEEE international conference, pp 2950–2954

  31. Dhungel N, Carneiro G, Bradley AP (2015) Deep learning and structured prediction for the segmentation of mass in mammograms. International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp 605–612

  32. Dhungel N, Carneiro G, Bradley AP (2017) A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention. Med Image Anal 37(1):114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gardezi SJS, Elazab A, Lei B, Wang T (2019) Breast Cancer detection and diagnosis using mammographic data: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21(7):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Google Brain Team (2017) TensorFlow, 9 11 2017. [Online]. Available: (Accessed 10, 2017), www.tensorflow.org

  35. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer WP (2001) The digital database for screening mammography. In: 5th international workshop on digital mammography, pp 1–10

  36. https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/CBISDDSM. Accessed 1 June 2019

  37. Jiao Z, Gao X, Wang Y, Li J (2016) A deep feature based framework for breast masses classification. Neurocomputing 197(C):221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiménez-Gaona Y, Rodríguez-Álvarez MJ, Lakshminarayanan V (2020) Deep-learning-based computer-aided systems for breast cancer imaging: a critical review. Appl Sci 10(8298):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jurman G, Riccadonna S, Furl C (2012) A comparison of MCC and CEN error measures in multi-class prediction. PLoSE ONE 7(8):e41882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kooi T, Litjens G, Ginneken B, Gubern AM, Sánchez CI, Mann R, Heeten A, Karssemeijer N (2017) Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med Image Anal 35:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. L. lab, Theano (2017) [Online] Available: University of Montreal, (Accessed 10 2017), http://deeplearning.net/software/theano/tutorial/

  42. Lahoura V, Singh H, Aggarwal A, Sharma B, Mohammed MA, Damaševičius R, Kadry S, Cengiz K (2021) Cloud computing-based framework for breast CancerDiagnosis using extreme learning machine. Diagnostics 11(241):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lee S, Lo C, Wang C, Chung P, Chang C, Yang C, Hsu P (2000) A computer-aided design mammography screening system for detection and classification of microcalcifications. Int J Med Inf 60(1):29–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li H, Meng X, Wang T, Tang Y, Yin Y (2017) Breast masses in mammography classification with local contour features. Biomed Eng Online 16(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, van der Laak JAWM, van Ginneken B, Sánchez CI (2017) A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 42(9):60–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Llobet R, Perez-Cortes J, Toselli A, Juan A (2007) Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer. Int J Med Inf 76(7):547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mahmood T, Li J, Pei Y, Akhtar F, Imran A, KU Rehman (2020) A brief survey on breast Cancer diagnostic with deep learning schemes using multi-image modalities. IEEE Access 8:165779–165809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moreira I, Amaral I, Domingues I, Cardoso A, Cardoso M, Cardoso J (2012) INbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Acad Radiol 19(2):236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Murtaza G, Shuib L, Wahab AWA, Mujtaba G, Mujtaba G, Nweke HF, Al-garadi MA, Zulfiqar F, Raza G, AnizaAzmi N (2020) Deep learning-based breast cancer classification through medical imaging modalities: state of the art and research challenges. Artif Intell Rev 53:1655–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Noh H, Hong S, Han B (2015) Learning deconvolution network for semantic segmentation. In: arXiv:1505.04366v1, pp 1520–1528

  51. Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A (2016) You only look once: unified, real time object detection. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 779–788

  52. Ricciardi R, Mettivier G, Staffa M, Sarno A, Acampora G, Minelli S, Santoro A, Antignani E, Orientale A, Pilotti IAM, Santangelo V, D'Andria P, Russo P (2021) A deep learning classifier for digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys Med 83:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp 1–15

  54. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention, vol 9351. Springer, Cham, pp 234–241

  55. Rostami M, Berahmand K, Forouzandeh S (2020) A novel method of constrained feature selection by the measurement of pairwise constraints uncertainty. J Big Data 7(83):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rostami M, Berahmand K, Forouzandeh S (2021) A novel community detection based genetic algorithm for feature selection. J Big Data 8(2):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  57. Saba T (2020) Recent advancement in cancer detection using machine learning: systematic survey of decades, comparisons and challenges. J Infect Public Health 13:1274–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Salama WM, Aly MH (2021) Deep learning in mammography images segmentation and classification: automated CNN approach. Alex Eng J 60:4701–4709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Shelhamer E, Long J, Darrell T (2017) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39(4):640–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: arXiv preprintarXiv:1409.1556, pp 1–14

  61. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang Y, Tao D, Gao X, Li X, Wang B (2011) Mammographic mass segmentation: embedding multiple features in vector-valued level set in ambiguous regions. Pattern Recogn 44(9):1903–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang Z, Li M, Wang H, Jiang H, Yao Y, Zhang H, Xin J (2019) Breast Cancer detection using extreme learning machine based on feature fusion with CNN deep features. IEEE Access 7:105146–105158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yassin NI, Omran S, Houby EM, Allam H (2018) Machine learning techniques for breast cancer computer aided diagnosis using different image modalities: a systematic review. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 156:25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yuan Y, Chao M, Lo Y-C (2017) Automatic skin lesion segmentation using deep fully convolutional networks with jaccard distance. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(9):1876–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Technology, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research (Deemed to be University), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

    Hemanta Kumar Bhuyan & A. Vijayaraj

  2. Center for Artificial Intelligence, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Khobar, 34754, Saudi Arabia

    Vinayakumar Ravi

Authors
  1. Hemanta Kumar Bhuyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Vijayaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinayakumar Ravi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinayakumar Ravi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhuyan, H.K., Vijayaraj, A. & Ravi, V. Diagnosis system for cancer disease using a single setting approach. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 46241–46267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15478-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15478-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation