Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchical watermarking framework based on analysis of local complexity variations

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing production and exchange of multimedia content have increased the need for better protection of copyright using watermarking. Different methods have been proposed to satisfy the tradeoff between imperceptibility and robustness as two important characteristics in watermarking while maintaining proper data-embedding capacity. Many watermarking methods use independent image set of parameters. Different images possess different potentials for the robust and transparent hosting of watermark data. To overcome this deficiency, in this paper we have proposed a new hierarchical adaptive watermarking framework. At the higher level of the hierarchy, the complexity of an image is ranked in comparison with complexities of images of a dataset. For a typical dataset of images, the statistical distribution of block complexities is found. At the lower level of the hierarchy, for a single cover image that is to be watermarked, complexities of blocks can be found. Local complexity variation among a block and its neighbors is used to change the watermark strength factor of each block adaptively. Such local complexity analysis creates an adaptive embedding scheme, which results in higher transparency by reducing blockiness effects. This two-level hierarchy has enabled our method to take advantage of all image blocks to elevate the embedding capacity while preserving imperceptibility. For testing the effectiveness of the proposed framework, contourlet transform in conjunction with discrete cosine transform is used to embed pseudorandom binary sequences as a watermark. Experimental results show that the proposed framework elevates the performance the watermarking routine regarding both robustness and transparency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu-Marie W, Gutub A, Abu-Mansour H (2010) Image based steganography using truth table based and determinate array on RGB indicator. Int J Sign Image Process 1(3):196–204

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akhaee MA, Sahraeian SME, Sankur B, Marvasti F (2009) Robust scaling-based image watermarking using maximum-likelihood decoder with optimum strength factor. IEEE Trans Multimed 11(5):822–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhaee MA, Sahraeian SME, Marvasti F (2010) Contourlet based image watermarking using optimum detector in noisy environment. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(4):967–980

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Otaibi NA, Gutub AA (2014) 2-Leyer security system for hiding sensitive text data on personal computers. Lect Notes Info Theory 2(2):151–157

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azizi S, Samavi S, Mohrekesh M, Shirani S (2013) Cascaded transform space watermarking based on analysis of local entropy variation. Proc Int Conf Multimed Expo Workshops (ICMEW): 1–6

  6. Barni M, Bartolini F, Cappellini V, Piva A (1998) A DCT-domain system for robust image watermarking. Sign Process J 66(3):357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castiglione A et al. (2015) On the protection of fMRI images in multi-domain environments. IEEE Int Conf Adv Info Netw Appl: 476–481

  8. Chauhan DS, Singh AK, Kumar B, Saini JP (2017) Quantization based multiple medical information watermarking for secure e-health. Multimed Tools Appl: 1–13

  9. Chouti L, Bouridane A, Ibrahim MK, Boussakta S (April 2006) Digital image watermarking using balanced multiwavelets. IEEE Trans Sign Process 54(4)

  10. Das S, Kumar Kundu M (2011) Hybrid Contourlet-DCT based robust image watermarking technique applied to medical data management. Proc Pattern Recogn Mach Intell: 286–292

  11. Do MN, Vetterli M (Dec. 2005) The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans Image Process 14:2091–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Etemad S, Samavi SR, Soroushmehr N, Karimi M, Etemad S Shirani, Najarian K (2017) Robust image watermarking scheme using bit-plane of hadamard coefficients. Multimed Tools Appl: 1–23

  13. Fazlali H, Samavi S, Karimi N, Shirani S (2017) Adaptive blind image watermarking using edge pixel concentration. Multimed Tools Appl 76(2):3105–3120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghannam S, Abou-Chadi FEZ (2009) Enhancing robustness of digital image watermarks using Contourlet transform. IEEE Int Conf Image Process (ICIP): 3645–3648

  15. Guo S, Cao H, Deng C (2008) Content-based adaptive watermarking algorithm in ridgelet domain. Proc Int Conf Audio, Language Image Process (ICALIP): 619–623

  16. Gutub A, Al-Qahtani A, Tabakh A (2009) Triple-a: secure RGB image steganography based on randomization. IEEE Int Conf Comput Syst Appl: 400–403

  17. Heidari M, Samavi S, Soroushmehr SMR, Shirani S, Karimi N, Najarian K (2016) Framework for robust blind image watermarking based on classification of attacks. Multimed Tools Appl: 1–21

  18. Izzolante R et al. (2014) Protection of microscopy images through digital watermarking techniques. Intell Netw Collab Syst: 65–72

  19. Kaviani HR, Samavi S, Karimi N, Shirani S (2012) Elevating watermark robustness by data diffusion in Contourlet coefficients. Proc Int Conf Commun Workshop(ICC): 6739–6743

  20. Khan F, Gutub A (2007) Message concealment techniques using image based steganography. IEEE GCC Conf Exhibit

  21. Lai C-C, Tsai C-C (2010) Digital image watermarking using discrete wavelet transform and singular value decomposition. IEEE Trans Instrum Measure 59:3060–3063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai C, Ko C, Yeh C (2012) An adaptive SVD-based watermarking scheme based on genetic algorithm. Proc Int Conf Machine Learn Cybernet (ICMLC) 4:1546–1551

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Q, Ying J (2012) Grayscale image digital watermarking technology based on wavelet analysis. Proc IEEE Sym Elect Electron Eng (EEESYM): 618–621

  24. Meerwald P, Uhl A (2001) A survey of wavelet domain watermarking algorithms. Electron Imaging, Sec Watermark Multimed Cont 4314 of Proc SPIE

  25. Munib S, Khan A (2017) Robust image watermarking technique using triangular regions and Zernike moments for quantization based embedding. Multimed Tools Appl 76(6):8695–8710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Podilchuk CI, Wenjun Z (1998) Image-adaptive watermarking using visual models. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 16(4):525–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Potdar M, Han S, Chang E (2005) A survey of digital image watermarking techniques. IEEE Int Conf Indust Info: 709–716

  28. Rana A, Pareek NK (2017) Comparative study of DCT and DWT techniques of digital image watermarking. Int Conf Info Commun Technol Intell Syst: 377–382

  29. Singh AK (2017) Improved hybrid algorithm for robust and imperceptible multiple watermarking using digital images. Multimed Tools Appl 76(6):8881–8900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Soderi S, Mucchi L, Hämäläinen M, Piva A, Iinatti J (2017) Physical layer security based on spread-spectrum watermarking and jamming receiver. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol 28(7)

  31. Solachidis V, Pitas L (2001) Circularly symmetric watermark embedding in 2-D DFT domain. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(11):1057–7149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. H. Song, S. Yu, X. Yang, L. Song, and C. Wang, “Contourlet-based image adaptive watermarking. Sign Process: Image Commun, vol 23, no 3, pp. 162–178, 2008

  33. Tao B, Dickinson B (1997) Adaptive watermarking in DCT domain. Proc Int Conf Acoust, Speech, Sign Process (ICASSP) 4:2985–2988

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang S, Kang C (2009) A wavelet watermarking based on HVS and watermarking capacity analysis. Proc Int Conf Multimed Info Netw Sec 2:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error measurement to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(1):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xiao S, Ling H, Zou F, Lu Z (2007) Adaptive image watermarking algorithm in Contourlet domain. Proc Jap Chin Joint Workshop Front Comput Sci Technol: 125–130

  37. Xu J, Zhang D (2010) A study on block classification watermarking algorithm based on adaptive adjustment factor. Proc Int Conf Comput Appl Syst Model (ICCASM) 11:106–109

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yan Y, Cao W, Li S (2009) Block-based adaptive image watermarking scheme using just noticeable difference. Proc Int Workshop Imaging Syst Tech: 377–380

  39. Zhao Y, Campisi P, Kundur D (2004) Dual domain watermarking for authentication and compression of cultural heritage images. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(3):430–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shadrokh Samavi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohrekesh, M., Azizi, S., Shirani, S. et al. Hierarchical watermarking framework based on analysis of local complexity variations. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 30865–30890 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6129-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6129-8

Keywords

Navigation