Abstract
Plant-rhizobacteria interaction and co-evolution developed adaptive strategies which may help the plant survive in nature. Plant rhizosphere soil isolates were analyzed to investigated the effects of rhizobacteria for promoting plant growth and suppress plant disease. Bacterial strains which isolated from plant rhizosphere soil were screened for elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) on tobacco. Strain S2-3-2 results in significant reduction of disease severity on tobacco, it was identified as Bacillus pumilus by multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). Strain S2-3-2 was deeper studied for pepper plant growth promotion and biological control activity against pepper bacterial spot disease. It was found that the pepper disease severity was decreased when the roots were drenched with strain S2-3-2, and the pepper plants had a higher weight and chlorophyll content, as compared with the mock-treated plants. Transcriptional expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) protein genes in pepper was analyzed by real-time PCR, gene expressions of CaPR1, CaPR4, and CaPR10 were increased when the plants were treated with strain S2-3-2. Moreover, strain S2-3-2 was tested for the production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and it was determined to emit volatiles that enhance the growth of the tobacco plants. Interesting, heat-killed S2-3-2 enhance the pepper root growth, increase the gene expressions of CaPR4 and CaPR10 after pathogen challenge for 6 h, but limited to suppress the pepper bacterial spot disease as compare to the mock-treated plants. Strain S2-3-2 can be a potential biological control agent on the plant root for plant growth promoting and disease suppression.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kevin VJ (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586
Ahemad M, Khan MS (2012) Evaluation of plant growth promoting activities of rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida under herbicide stress. Ann Microbiol 62:1531–1540
Kloepper JW, Leong J, Teintze M, Schroth MN (1980) Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 268:885–886
Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556
Raza W, Yuan J, Ling N, Huang Q, Shen Q (2015) Production of volatile organic compounds by an antagonistic strain Paenibacillus polymyxa WR-2 in the presence of root exudates and organic fertilizer and their antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Biol Control 80:89–95
Tan S, Jiang Y, Song S, Huang J, Ling N, Xu Y, Shen Q (2013) Two Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains isolated using the competitive tomato root enrichment method and their effects on suppressing Ralstonia solanacearum and promoting tomato plant growth. Crop Prot 43:134–140
Cao S, Yang Z, Hu Z, Zheng Y (2011) The effects of the combination of Pichia membranefaciens and BTH on controlling of blue mould decay caused by Penicillium expansum in peach fruit. Food Chem 124:991–996
Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266
Vlot AC, Dempsey DA, Klessig DF (2009) Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:177–206
Pieterse CM, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SC, Bakker PA (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:347–375
Grant M, Lamb C (2006) Systemic immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:414–420
Malamy J, Carr JP, Klessig DF, Raskin I (1990) Salicylic acid: a likely endogenous signal in the resistance response of tobacco to viral infection. Science 250:1002–1004
Bakker PA, Pieterse CM, de Jonge R, Berendsen RL (2018) The soil-borne legacy. Cell 172:1178–1180
Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483
Bakker PA, Doornbos RF, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM (2013) Induced systemic resistance and the rhizosphere microbiome. Plant Pathol J 29:136–143
Sharma S, Chen C, Navathe S, Chand R, Pandey SP (2019) A halotolerant growth promoting rhizobacteria triggers induced systemic resistance in plants and defends against fungal infection. Sci Rep 9:1–17
Jones JB, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Almira EC, Robert PD, Bowen BW, Sudberry J, Strickler PM, Chun J (2000) Systematic analysis of xanthomonads (Xanthomonas spp.) associated with pepper and tomato lesions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:1211–1219
Stall RE, Beaulieu C, Egel D, Hodge NC, Leite RP, Minsavage GV, Bouzar H, Jones JB, Alvarez AM, Benedict AA (1994) Two genetically diverse groups of strains are included in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 44:47–53
Mirik M, Aysan Y, Çinar Ö (2008) Biological control of bacterial spot disease of pepper with Bacillus strains. Turk J Agric For 32:381–390
Obradovic A, Mavridis A, Rudolph K, Janse JD, Arsenijevic M, Jones JB, Minsavage GV, Wang JF (2004) Characterization and PCR-based typing of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from peppers and tomatoes in serbia. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:285–292
Lee KS (1997) Evaluation on the effects of pesticide residues to agroecosystem in Korea. Kor J Environ Agric 16:80–93
Mirik M, Aysan Y, Cinar O (2007) Copper-resistant strains of Xanthomonas axanopodis pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. J Plant Pathol 89:153–154
Campbell L, Moss BJ, Dianese A, Wilson M (1998) The good, the bad, and the ugly: biocontrol of bacterial spot of tomato. Highlights of Agricultural Research. Ala Agric Exp St 45:8–10
Shen SS, Choi OH, Park SH, Kim CG, Park CS (2005) Root colonizing and biocontrol competency of Serratia plymuthica A21–4 against Phytophthrora Blight of Pepper. Plant Pathol J 21:64–67
Tan L, Rong W, Lou H, Chen Y, He C (2014) The Xanthomonas campestris effector protein XopDXcc8004 triggers plant disease tolerance by targeting DELLA proteins. New Phytol 204:595–608
Kaya C, Ashraf M, Alyemeni MN, Ahmad P (2020) The role of endogenous nitric oxide in salicylic acid-induced up-regulation of ascorbate-glutathione cycle involved in salinity tolerance of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 147:10–20
Misra N, Saxena P (2009) Effect of salicylic acid on proline metabolism in lentil grown under salinity stress. Plant Sci 177:181–189
Ardebili NO, Saadatmand S, Niknam V, Khavari-Nejad RA (2014) The alleviating effects of selenium and salicylic acid in salinity exposed soybean. Acta Physiol Plant 36:3199–3205
Wilson K (1997) Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In: Ausubel FM et al (eds) Curr Protoc Mol Biol. Wiley, New York, pp 2.4.1–2.4.5
Snaidr J, Amann R, Huber I, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1997) Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of bacteria in activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2884–2896
Liu Y, Lai Q, Dong C, Sun F, Wang L, Li G, Shao Z (2013) Phylogenetic diversity of the Bacillus pumilus group and the marine ecotype revealed by multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS ONE 8:11
Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J (2017) Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA and whole genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613–1617
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874
Glickmann E, Dessaux Y (1995) A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:793–796
Islam S, Akanda AM, Prova A, Islam MT, Hossain MM (2016) Isolation and identification of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from cucumber rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion and disease suppression. Front Microbiol 6:1360
Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15
Kang SH, Cho HS, Cheong H, Ryu CM, Kim JF, Park SH (2007) Two bacterial entophytes eliciting both plant growth promotion and plant defense on pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:96–103
Sarowar S, Kim EN, Kim YJ, Ok SH, Kim KD, Hwang BK, Shin JS (2005) Overexpression of a pepper ascorbate peroxidase-like 1 gene in tobacco plants enhances tolerance to oxidative stress and pathogens. Plant Sci 169:55–63
Yang JW, Yu SH, Ryu CM (2009) Priming of defense-related genes confers root-colonizing bacilli-elicited induced systemic resistance in pepper. Plant Pathol J 25:389–399
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408
Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B, Basnet M (2006) Plant growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis by Bacillus megaterium. J Basic Microbiol 46:186–195
Gutiérrez-Mañero FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Probanza A, Mehouachi J, Tadeo FR, Talon M (2001) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211
Kim JT, Kim SD (2008) Suppression of bacterial wilt with Bacillus subtilis SKU48-2 strain. Kor J Microbiol Biotechnol 36:115–120
Jetiyanon K (1998) Interaction between PGPR and cucumber during induced systemic resistance: Recognition and early host defense responses. Dissertation, Auburn University
Son JS, Sumayo M, Hwang YJ, Kim BS, Ghim SY (2014) Screening of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as elicitor of systemic resistance against gray leaf spot disease in pepper. Appl Soil Ecol 73:1–8
Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1996) Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and increased plant growth by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Phytopathology 86:221–224
Yi HS, Yang JW, Ryu CM (2013) ISR meets SAR outside: additive action of the endophyte Bacillus pumilus INR7 and the chemical inducer, benzothiadiazole, on induced resistance against bacterial spot in field-grown pepper. Front Plant Sci 4:122
Zhang S, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW (2004) Tobacco growth enhancement and blue mold disease protection by rhizobacteria: relationship between plant growth promotion and systemic disease protection by PGPR strain 90–166. Plant Soil 262:277–288
Enebak SA, Wei G, Kloepper JW (1998) Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on loblolly and slash pine seedlings. For Sci 44:139–144
Zheng M, Shi J, Shi J, Wang Q, Li Y (2013) Antimicrobial effects of volatiles produced by two antagonistic Bacillus strains on the anthracnose pathogen in postharvest mangos. Biol Control 65:200–206
Jetiyanon K, Fowler WD, Kloepper JW (2003) Broad-spectrum protection against several pathogens by PGPR mixtures under field conditions in Thailand. Plant Dis 87:1390–1394
Huh SU, Paek KH (2013) Plant RNA binding proteins for control of RNA virus infection. Front Physiol 4:397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This manuscript does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Lee, SY., Cho, YJ. et al. Mediation of induced systemic resistance by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus S2-3-2. Mol Biol Rep 47, 8429–8438 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05883-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05883-9