Skip to main content
Log in

Mediation of induced systemic resistance by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus S2-3-2

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant-rhizobacteria interaction and co-evolution developed adaptive strategies which may help the plant survive in nature. Plant rhizosphere soil isolates were analyzed to investigated the effects of rhizobacteria for promoting plant growth and suppress plant disease. Bacterial strains which isolated from plant rhizosphere soil were screened for elicitation of induced systemic resistance (ISR) on tobacco. Strain S2-3-2 results in significant reduction of disease severity on tobacco, it was identified as Bacillus pumilus by multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). Strain S2-3-2 was deeper studied for pepper plant growth promotion and biological control activity against pepper bacterial spot disease. It was found that the pepper disease severity was decreased when the roots were drenched with strain S2-3-2, and the pepper plants had a higher weight and chlorophyll content, as compared with the mock-treated plants. Transcriptional expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) protein genes in pepper was analyzed by real-time PCR, gene expressions of CaPR1, CaPR4, and CaPR10 were increased when the plants were treated with strain S2-3-2. Moreover, strain S2-3-2 was tested for the production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and it was determined to emit volatiles that enhance the growth of the tobacco plants. Interesting, heat-killed S2-3-2 enhance the pepper root growth, increase the gene expressions of CaPR4 and CaPR10 after pathogen challenge for 6 h, but limited to suppress the pepper bacterial spot disease as compare to the mock-treated plants. Strain S2-3-2 can be a potential biological control agent on the plant root for plant growth promoting and disease suppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kevin VJ (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahemad M, Khan MS (2012) Evaluation of plant growth promoting activities of rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida under herbicide stress. Ann Microbiol 62:1531–1540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kloepper JW, Leong J, Teintze M, Schroth MN (1980) Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 268:885–886

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raza W, Yuan J, Ling N, Huang Q, Shen Q (2015) Production of volatile organic compounds by an antagonistic strain Paenibacillus polymyxa WR-2 in the presence of root exudates and organic fertilizer and their antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Biol Control 80:89–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan S, Jiang Y, Song S, Huang J, Ling N, Xu Y, Shen Q (2013) Two Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains isolated using the competitive tomato root enrichment method and their effects on suppressing Ralstonia solanacearum and promoting tomato plant growth. Crop Prot 43:134–140

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao S, Yang Z, Hu Z, Zheng Y (2011) The effects of the combination of Pichia membranefaciens and BTH on controlling of blue mould decay caused by Penicillium expansum in peach fruit. Food Chem 124:991–996

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vlot AC, Dempsey DA, Klessig DF (2009) Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:177–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pieterse CM, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SC, Bakker PA (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:347–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grant M, Lamb C (2006) Systemic immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:414–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malamy J, Carr JP, Klessig DF, Raskin I (1990) Salicylic acid: a likely endogenous signal in the resistance response of tobacco to viral infection. Science 250:1002–1004

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakker PA, Pieterse CM, de Jonge R, Berendsen RL (2018) The soil-borne legacy. Cell 172:1178–1180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bakker PA, Doornbos RF, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM (2013) Induced systemic resistance and the rhizosphere microbiome. Plant Pathol J 29:136–143

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma S, Chen C, Navathe S, Chand R, Pandey SP (2019) A halotolerant growth promoting rhizobacteria triggers induced systemic resistance in plants and defends against fungal infection. Sci Rep 9:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones JB, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Almira EC, Robert PD, Bowen BW, Sudberry J, Strickler PM, Chun J (2000) Systematic analysis of xanthomonads (Xanthomonas spp.) associated with pepper and tomato lesions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:1211–1219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stall RE, Beaulieu C, Egel D, Hodge NC, Leite RP, Minsavage GV, Bouzar H, Jones JB, Alvarez AM, Benedict AA (1994) Two genetically diverse groups of strains are included in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 44:47–53

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mirik M, Aysan Y, Çinar Ö (2008) Biological control of bacterial spot disease of pepper with Bacillus strains. Turk J Agric For 32:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  20. Obradovic A, Mavridis A, Rudolph K, Janse JD, Arsenijevic M, Jones JB, Minsavage GV, Wang JF (2004) Characterization and PCR-based typing of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from peppers and tomatoes in serbia. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:285–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee KS (1997) Evaluation on the effects of pesticide residues to agroecosystem in Korea. Kor J Environ Agric 16:80–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirik M, Aysan Y, Cinar O (2007) Copper-resistant strains of Xanthomonas axanopodis pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. J Plant Pathol 89:153–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Campbell L, Moss BJ, Dianese A, Wilson M (1998) The good, the bad, and the ugly: biocontrol of bacterial spot of tomato. Highlights of Agricultural Research. Ala Agric Exp St 45:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shen SS, Choi OH, Park SH, Kim CG, Park CS (2005) Root colonizing and biocontrol competency of Serratia plymuthica A21–4 against Phytophthrora Blight of Pepper. Plant Pathol J 21:64–67

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tan L, Rong W, Lou H, Chen Y, He C (2014) The Xanthomonas campestris effector protein XopDXcc8004 triggers plant disease tolerance by targeting DELLA proteins. New Phytol 204:595–608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaya C, Ashraf M, Alyemeni MN, Ahmad P (2020) The role of endogenous nitric oxide in salicylic acid-induced up-regulation of ascorbate-glutathione cycle involved in salinity tolerance of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 147:10–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Misra N, Saxena P (2009) Effect of salicylic acid on proline metabolism in lentil grown under salinity stress. Plant Sci 177:181–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ardebili NO, Saadatmand S, Niknam V, Khavari-Nejad RA (2014) The alleviating effects of selenium and salicylic acid in salinity exposed soybean. Acta Physiol Plant 36:3199–3205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson K (1997) Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In: Ausubel FM et al (eds) Curr Protoc Mol Biol. Wiley, New York, pp 2.4.1–2.4.5

    Google Scholar 

  30. Snaidr J, Amann R, Huber I, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1997) Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of bacteria in activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2884–2896

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Y, Lai Q, Dong C, Sun F, Wang L, Li G, Shao Z (2013) Phylogenetic diversity of the Bacillus pumilus group and the marine ecotype revealed by multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS ONE 8:11

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J (2017) Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA and whole genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613–1617

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Glickmann E, Dessaux Y (1995) A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:793–796

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Islam S, Akanda AM, Prova A, Islam MT, Hossain MM (2016) Isolation and identification of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from cucumber rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion and disease suppression. Front Microbiol 6:1360

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kang SH, Cho HS, Cheong H, Ryu CM, Kim JF, Park SH (2007) Two bacterial entophytes eliciting both plant growth promotion and plant defense on pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:96–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sarowar S, Kim EN, Kim YJ, Ok SH, Kim KD, Hwang BK, Shin JS (2005) Overexpression of a pepper ascorbate peroxidase-like 1 gene in tobacco plants enhances tolerance to oxidative stress and pathogens. Plant Sci 169:55–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang JW, Yu SH, Ryu CM (2009) Priming of defense-related genes confers root-colonizing bacilli-elicited induced systemic resistance in pepper. Plant Pathol J 25:389–399

    Google Scholar 

  44. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B, Basnet M (2006) Plant growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis by Bacillus megaterium. J Basic Microbiol 46:186–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gutiérrez-Mañero FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Probanza A, Mehouachi J, Tadeo FR, Talon M (2001) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kim JT, Kim SD (2008) Suppression of bacterial wilt with Bacillus subtilis SKU48-2 strain. Kor J Microbiol Biotechnol 36:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jetiyanon K (1998) Interaction between PGPR and cucumber during induced systemic resistance: Recognition and early host defense responses. Dissertation, Auburn University

  49. Son JS, Sumayo M, Hwang YJ, Kim BS, Ghim SY (2014) Screening of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as elicitor of systemic resistance against gray leaf spot disease in pepper. Appl Soil Ecol 73:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1996) Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and increased plant growth by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Phytopathology 86:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yi HS, Yang JW, Ryu CM (2013) ISR meets SAR outside: additive action of the endophyte Bacillus pumilus INR7 and the chemical inducer, benzothiadiazole, on induced resistance against bacterial spot in field-grown pepper. Front Plant Sci 4:122

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang S, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW (2004) Tobacco growth enhancement and blue mold disease protection by rhizobacteria: relationship between plant growth promotion and systemic disease protection by PGPR strain 90–166. Plant Soil 262:277–288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Enebak SA, Wei G, Kloepper JW (1998) Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on loblolly and slash pine seedlings. For Sci 44:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zheng M, Shi J, Shi J, Wang Q, Li Y (2013) Antimicrobial effects of volatiles produced by two antagonistic Bacillus strains on the anthracnose pathogen in postharvest mangos. Biol Control 65:200–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Jetiyanon K, Fowler WD, Kloepper JW (2003) Broad-spectrum protection against several pathogens by PGPR mixtures under field conditions in Thailand. Plant Dis 87:1390–1394

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Huh SU, Paek KH (2013) Plant RNA binding proteins for control of RNA virus infection. Front Physiol 4:397

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hee-Young Jung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This manuscript does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Lee, SY., Cho, YJ. et al. Mediation of induced systemic resistance by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus S2-3-2. Mol Biol Rep 47, 8429–8438 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05883-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05883-9

Keywords

Navigation