Abstract
Interspecific comparative studies require that expression data be comparable among species, and when species with different levels of ploidy are contemplated the relative expression per cell should be obtained for accurate comparisons to be made. Quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR is the most popular and sensitive technique for the detection and quantification of mRNA in gene expression analysis. In recent years it has become clear that the choice of reference genes for the normalization of expression data is very important. Several studies have shown that the expression of the traditional housekeeping genes varies under certain situations; their use as reference genes in quantitative PCR assays can therefore lead to errors when interpreting the relative expression of target genes. Normalizing with respect to endogenous genes showing a constant level of expression per cell across species, however, provides an easy way of obtaining comparable expression data for other genes in those species. In this work, the validity of several candidate genes was examined across four diploid and polyploid species of the genera Triticum and Aegilops. Candidate reference genes were chosen among the traditional housekeeping genes used in quantitative PCR analysis, as well as others found to have stable levels of expression under different conditions in other studies. After the analyses, candidate genes were gathered into two groups according to the different levels of expression per cell seen in polyploid species. For the four species studied, two genes suitable for normalization procedures in interspecific studies were identified: cell division control protein and malate dehydrogenase. Both showed a constant number of transcripts per cell, independent of the level of ploidy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheng ZJ, Ni Z (2006) Mechanisms of genomic rearrangements and gene expression changes in plant polyploids. BioEssays 28(3):240–252
Feldman M, Levy AA (2009) Genome evolution in allopolyploid wheat—a revolutionary reprogramming followed by gradual changes. J Genet Genomics 36(9):511–518
Adams KL (2007) Evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploid and hybrid plants. J Hered 98(2):136–141
Pignatta D, Comai L (2009) Parental squabbles and genome expression: lessons from the polyploids. J Biol 8(4):43
Jackson S, Chen ZF (2010) Genomic and expression plasticity of polyploidy. Curr Opin Biol 13(2):153–159
Kong F, Mao S, Jiang J, Wang J, Fang X, Wang Y (2011) Proteomic changes in newly synthesized Brassica napus allotetraploids and their early generations. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29:927–935
Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A (2005) Real-time RT-PCR normalization: strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 6(4):279–284
Vandesompele J, Kubista M, Pfaffl MW (2009) Reference gene validation software for improved normalization. In: Logan J, Edwards K, Saunders N (eds) Real-time PCR: current technology applications, vol 4. Health Protection Agency, London
Brunner AM, Yakovlev IA, Strauss SH (2004) Validating internal controls for quantitative plant gene expression studies. BMC Plant Biol 4:14
Expósito-Rodríguez M, Borges AA, Borges-Pérez A, Pérez JA (2008) Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process. BMC Plant Biol 8:131
Long XY, Wang JR, Ouellet T, Rocheleau H, Wei YM, Pu ZE, Jiang QT, Lan XJ, Zheng YL (2010) Genome-wide identification and evaluation of novel internal control genes for Q-PCR based transcript normalization in wheat. Plant Mol Biol 74(3):307–311
Guénin S, Mauriat M, Pelloux J, Wuytswinkel O, Bellini C, Gutierrez L (2009) Normalization of qRT-PCT data: the necessity of adopting a systematic, experimental conditions-specific, validation of references. J Exp Bot 60(2):487–493
Hansen MC, Nielsen AK, Molin S, Hammer K, Kilstrup M (2001) Changes in rRNA levels during stress invalidates results from mRNA blotting: fluorescence in situ rRNA hybridization permits renormalization for estimation of cellular mRNA levels. J Bacteriol 183(16):4747–4751
Shimada H, Obayashi T, Takahashi N, Matsui M, Sakamoto A (2010) Normalization using ploidy and genomic DNA copy number allows absolute quantification of transcripts, proteins and metabolites in cells. Plant Methods 6:29
Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3 (7): RESEARCH0034
Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: bestKeeper—excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26(6):509–515
Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64(15):5245–5250
Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altman T, Udvardi MK, Scheible WR (2005) Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139(1):5–17
Faccioli P, Ciceri GP, Provero P, Stanca AM, Morcia C, Terzi V (2007) A combined strategy of “in silico” transcriptome analysis and web search engine optimization allows an agile identification of reference genes suitable for normalization in gene expression studies. Plant Mol Biol 63(5):679–688
Jarosova J, Kundu JK (2010) Validation of reference genes as internal control for studying viral infections in cereals by quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Plant Biol 10(1):146
Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP (2006) Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345(2):646–651
Chen K, Fessehaie A, Arora R (2012) Selection of reference genes for normalizing gene expression during seed priming and germination using qPCR in Zea mays and Spinacia oleracea. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:478–487
Paolacci AR, Tanzarella OA, Porceddu E, Ciaffi M (2009) Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR normalization in wheat. BMC Mol Biol 10:11
Chantret N, Salse J, Sabot F, Rahman S, Bellec A, Laubin B, Dubois I, Dossat C, Sourdille P, Joudrier P, Gautier MF, Cattolico L, Beckert M, Aubourg S, Weissenbach J, Caboche M, Bernard M, Leroy P, Chalhoub B (2005) Molecular basis of evolutionary events that shaped the hardness locus in diploid and polyploidy wheat species (Triticum and Aegilops). Plant Cell 17(4):1033–1045
Petersen G, Seberg O, Yde M, Berthelsen K (2006) Phylogenetic relationships of Triticum and Aegilops and evidence for the origin of the A, B, and D genomes of common wheat (Triticum aestivum). Mol Phylogenet Evol 39(1):70–82
De Bustos A, Pérez R, Jouve N (2007) Characterization of the gene Mre11 and evidence of silencing alter polyploidization in Triticum. Theor Appl Genet 114(6):985–999
Pérez R, Cuadrado A, Chen IP, Puchta H, Jouve N, De Bustos A (2011) The Rad50 genes of diploid and polyploid wheat species. Analysis of homologue and homoeologue expression and interactions with Mre11. Theor Appl Genet 122(2):251–262
Pérez R, Cuadrado A, Jouve N, De Bustos A (2011) Characterization of the Nbs1 gene and analysis of the expression of homologous and homoeologous MRN complex genes in meiocytes and somatic cells of different wheat species. Int J Plant Sci 172(8):959–969
Sharp PJ, Desai S, Gale MD (1988) Isoenzyme variation and RFLPs at the β-amylase loci in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 76(5):691–699
Hellemans J, Mortier G, de Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8(2):R19
Derveaux S, Vandesompele J, Hellemans J (2010) How to do successful gene expression analysis using real-time PCR. Methods 50(4):227–230
Remans T, Smeets K, Opdenakker K, Mathijsen D, Vangronsveld J, Cuypers A (2008) Normalisation of real-time RT-PCR gene expression measurements in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to increased metal concentrations. Planta 227(6):1343–1349
Eilam T, Anikster Y, Millet E, Manisterski J, Sagi-Assif O, Feldman M (2007) Nuclear DNA amount in diploid Triticeae species. Genome 50(11):1029–1037
Eilam T, Anikster E, Millet E, Manisterski J, Feldman M (2008) Nuclear DNA amount and genome downsizing in natural and synthetic allopolyploids of the genera Aegilops and Triticum. Genome 51(8):616–627
Pyke KA, Jellings AJ, Leech RM (1990) Variation in mesophyll cell number and size in wheat leaves. Ann Bot 65(6):679–683
Coate JE, Doyle JJ (2010) Quantifying whole transcriptome size, a prerequisite for understanding transcriptome evolution across species: an example from a plant allopolyploid. Genome Biol Evol 2:534–546
Guo M, Davis D, Birchler JA (1996) Dosage effects on gene expression in a maize ploidy series. Genetics 142(4):1349–1355
Kanno J, Aisaki K, Igarashi K, Nakatsu N, Ono A, Kodama Y, Nagao T (2006) “Per cell” normalization method for mRNA measurement by quantitative PCR and microarrays. BMC Genom 7:64
Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10(1):57–63
Giménez MJ, Pistón F, Atienza SG (2011) Identification of suitable reference genes for normalization of qPCR data in comparative transcriptomics analyses in the Triticeae. Planta 233(1):163–173
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (AGL2009-10373 and AGL2012-34052). RP is supported by a grant of the I3 Program of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science. The authors thank Adrian Burton for linguistic assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez, R., Jouve, N. & De Bustos, A. Comparative analysis of gene expression among species of different ploidy. Mol Biol Rep 41, 6525–6535 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3536-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3536-4