Skip to main content
Log in

Implicit and explicit learning of socio-emotional information are not related to the level of depressive symptomatology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past research has found that depression is associated with a multitude of deficits in processing social stimuli. These deficits might impair the implicit (unconscious) learning of socio-emotional regularities, an essential process for adaptive social functioning. In contrast, previous research on adaptive functions of depression suggests that dysphoric states can be associated, in some circumstances, with increased accuracy in detecting regularities. However, a direct assessment of implicit learning of socio-emotional regularities in depression has not yet been conducted.

In the present studies, we adapted the Artificial Grammar Learning task to induce implicit and explicit learning of regularities that govern social emotional stimuli (facial emotional expressions in Experiment 1) and social stimuli without explicit emotional content (body movements in Experiment 2). We assessed participants’ learning and awareness of these regularities, as well as their levels of depression. In both experiments, Bayesian analyses showed that the depressive symptomatology was neither associated with a learning deficit, nor with a learning advantage. This was the case for participants’ overall performance, as well as for their implicit and their explicit learning performance.

Our results contradict most previous findings and show that, even though depressive symptoms are associated with a variety of socio-cognitive deficits, they do not hinder the ability to implicitly or explicitly learn regularities within social contexts. Our results also show some constraints on the types of abilities that can be enhanced by depressive states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The guidelines of the Babeș-Bolyai University’s Research Review Board exempt the present study from review and approval by the Board, as it was part of the first author’s doctoral research. In these cases, the student and their supervisor are responsible for ensuring compliance with the relevant national and international ethical guidelines in the field.

  2. Of course, as long as the alternative hypotheses make different predictions regarding how the data will look like. For a rationale, see the section “The answer to the question should depend on the question” in Dienes & Mclatchie 2018; see Ziori & Dienes 2015, for an example of AGL study that tested two alternative hypotheses on the same data.

  3. Age and gender were introduced as covariates because, in preliminary correlations, we found that age was positively related with participants’ overall accuracy and with their implicit accuracy in Experiment 1. Gender was also related to participants’ conscious performance in experiment 2 (i.e., men performed better) and with the proportion of implicit responses in experiment 1 (i.e., women used more implicit responses). For brevity, we do not report these relations separately as correlations, because age and gender emerge as significant predictors in the regression analyses that we report.

  4. The Bayes factors (B) for the analyses reported in this section were computed using a normal prior distribution, with the mean equal to the overall learning effect obtained with the most similar AGL task used in a previous study (i.e., 6% in Ziori & Dienes 2015) and the SD = mean/2.

  5. For each combination they also responded to an additional awareness scale that was relevant for the objectives of the original study and that is not discussed further.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Sorina Florea and Ioana Mesterelu for their assistance with the data collection; to Dr. Zoltan Dienes for advice and feedback on the Bayesian analytical approach; and to Dr. Nim Tottenham for granting the permission to use the NimStim database. R.J. was supported by a Post-Doctoral research grant awarded by Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, and Development of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research (PN-III-P1-1.1- PD-2019-0975). A. O., R. J., and A.C. were supported by an Experimental-Demonstrative Project grant awarded by the Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, and Development of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research (PN-III-P2–2.1-PED-2019-4599).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Răzvan Jurchis.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest regarding this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jurchis, R., Costea, A. & Opre, A. Implicit and explicit learning of socio-emotional information are not related to the level of depressive symptomatology. Motiv Emot 47, 795–809 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10022-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10022-5

Keywords

Navigation