Abstract
Participants (Study 1: N = 138, Study 2: N = 153) responded to a video in which a person suffered a mishap. The studies manipulated whether or not the person was responsible for the mishap and the degree to which the consequences were subsequently found to be serious. Results of Study 1 showed reduction in schadenfreude and more compassion for the victim in the serious condition due to appraisals that it was immoral to laugh about the misfortune. The stronger these appraisals and the stronger the initial schadenfreude, the stronger were moral emotions (guilt, shame, and regret) about initially expressed schadenfreude. Moral emotions and compassion fostered prosocial behavior. Study 2 extended these results by showing that seriousness of the consequences acted as a moderator for most of these findings with significant effects occurring in the serious condition only. Most reduction in schadenfreude occurred when the consequences were serious and when the person was less responsible for the misfortune. The studies extend past research by investigating schadenfreude and other emotions in a context that does not involve social comparison and where participants reflected on their initial expressions of schadenfreude.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We included more dependent variables in the study than we reported here. A full version of the measures can be provided by the corresponding author.
Removing these participants in the analyses did not change our main findings.
References
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality (Vol. 1 & 2). New York: Columbia University Press.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1173–1182.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2014). The personal comparative concern in schadenfreude. In W. W. van Dijk & J. W. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (pp. 77–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berndsen, M., & Gausel, N. (2015). When majority members exclude ethnic minorities: The impact of shame on the desire to object to immoral acts. European Journal of Social Psychology,. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2127.
Berndsen, M., & McGarty, C. (2010). The impact of magnitude of harm and perceived difficulty of making reparations on group-based guilt and reparation towards victims of historical harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 500–513. doi:10.1002/ejsp.642.
Berndsen, M., & McGarty, C. (2012). Perspective taking and opinions about forms of reparation for victims of historical harm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1316–1328. doi:10.1177/0146167212450322.
Bride falls in pool-YouTube (2008). www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwaJgz_CKmw.
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Routledge.
Combs, D. J. Y., Powell, C. A. J., Schurtz, D. R., & Smith, R. H. (2009). Politics, schadenfreude, and ingroup identification: The sometimes happy thing about a poor economy and death. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 635–646. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.009.
de Hooge, I. E., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 933–943. doi:10.1037/a0011991.
Dovidio, J. F., Allen, J. L., & Schroeder, D. A. (1990). The specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 249–260. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.249.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.
Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.528.
Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–544. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.571.
Feather, N. T. (1999a). Judgements of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86–107.
Feather, N. T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73.
Feather, N. T. (2008). Perceived legitimacy of a promotion decision in relation to deservingness, entitlement, and resentment in the context of affirmative action and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1230–1254. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00346.x.
Feather, N. T. (2014). Deservingness and schadenfreude. In W. W. van Dijk & J. W. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (pp. 29–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feather, N. T. (2015). Analyzing relative deprivation in relation to deservingness, entitlement and resentment. Social Justice Research, 28, 7–26. doi:10.1007/s11211-015-0242-x.
Feather, N. T., McKee, I. R., & Bekker, N. (2011). Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 35(1–13), 13. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9202-4.
Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, Schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 953–961. doi:10.1177/014616720202800708.
Feather, N. T., Wenzel, M., & McKee, I. R. (2013). Integrating multiple perspectives on schadenfreude: The role of deservingness and emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 574–585. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9331-4.
Feather, N. T., Woodyatt, L., & McKee, I. R. (2012). Predicting support for social actions: How values, justice-related variables, discrete emotions, and outcome expectations influence support for the Stolen Generations. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 516–528. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9262-5.
Fischer, A., Manstead, A. S. R., & Zaalberg, R. (2003). Social influences on the emotion process. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 171–176. doi:10.1080/10463280340000054.
Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gausel, N., & Brown, R. (2012). Shame and guilt—Do they really differ in their focus of evaluation? Wanting to change the self and behavior in response to ingroup immorality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 1–20. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.657265.
Gausel, N., Leach, C. W., Vignoles, V. L., & Brown, R. (2012). Defend or repair? Explaining responses to ingroup moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 941–960. doi:10.1037/a0027233.
German man jumps into hard frozen pool-YouTube (2012). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA1KSLL061c.
Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.379.
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamilton, V. L., & Sanders, T. (1992). Everyday justice: Responsibility and the individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2002). Dislike and envy as antecedents of pleasure at another’s misfortune. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 257–277. doi:10.1023/a:1022818803399.
Harth, N. S., Kessler, T., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Advantaged group’s emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 115–129. doi:10.1177/0146167207309193.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hoogland, C., Shurtz, D. R., Cooper, C. M., Combs, D. J. Y., Brown, E. G., & Smith, R. H. (2015). The joy of pain and the pain of joy: In-group identification predicts schadenfreude and gluckschmerz following rival groups’ fortunes. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 260–281. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9447-9.
Iyer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Emotion in inter-group relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 86–125. doi:10.1080/10463280802079738.
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Pedersen, A. (2004). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group-based emotions. In N. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 262–283). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572–587. doi:10.1177/0146167206297402.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834.
Leach, C. W. (2014). Are we good enough? Defining and defending the morality of our groups. Retrieved August 1, 2015 from http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2014/07/good-enough.aspx.
Leach, C. W., Bilali, R., & Pagliaro, S. (2014a). Groups and morality. In J. Simpson & J. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2: Interpersonal relationships and group processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2008). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234.
Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2008). A vengefulness of the impotent’: The pain of in-group inferiority and schadenfreude toward successful out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1383–1396. doi:10.1037/a0012629.
Leach, C. W., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2014b). Situating schadenfreude in social relations. In W. W. van Dijk & J. W. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (pp. 200–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lickel, B., Kushlev, K., Savalei, V., Matta, S., & Schmader, T. (2014). Shame and motivation to change the self. Emotion, 14, 1049–1061. doi:10.1037/a0038235.
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 147–186. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340.
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A. M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 659–680. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00515.x.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol.5. Emotions, relationships and health (Vol. 5, pp. 11–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, J. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.632.
Schurtz, D. R., Combs, D. J. Y., Hoogland, C., & Smith, R. H. (2014). Schadenfreude in sports and politics: A social identity perspective. In W. W. van Dijk & J. W. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (pp. 170–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813.
Smith, R. H., Thielke, S. M., & Powell, C. A. J. (2014). Empirical challenges to understanding the role of envy in schadenfreude. In W. W. van Dijk & J. W. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (pp. 91–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A. G. (2014). The two faces of shame: The roles of shame and guilt in predicting recidivism. Psychological Science, 25, 799–805. doi:10.1177/0956797613508790.
Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 653–771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
van Dijk, W. W., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2014). Striving for positive self-evaluation as a motive for schadenfreude. In W. W. van Dijk & J. W. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (pp. 131–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Goslinga, S., & Nieweg, M. (2005). Deservingness and schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 933–939. doi:10.1080/02699930541000066.
van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Goslinga, S., Nieweg, M., & Gallucci, M. (2006). When people fall from grace: Reconsidering the role of envy in schadenfreude. Emotion, 6, 156–160. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.156.
van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Smith, R. H., & Cikara, M. (2015). The role of self-evaluation and envy in schadenfreude. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 247–282. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1111600
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: The Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors contributed equally to this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berndsen, M., Feather, N.T. Reflecting on schadenfreude: serious consequences of a misfortune for which one is not responsible diminish previously expressed schadenfreude; the role of immorality appraisals and moral emotions. Motiv Emot 40, 895–913 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9580-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9580-8