Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting support for social action: How values, justice-related variables, discrete emotions, and outcome expectations influence support for the Stolen Generations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Stolen Generations are Indigenous Australians who were taken from their homes by the State and placed in children’s homes or foster care. This study investigated relations between the values held by Non-Indigenous Australians and willingness to support a hypothetical organization set up to repair the damage caused. Participants (N = 235) completed the Schwartz Portrait Values Questionnaire followed by items concerning their perceived responsibility; Indigenous deservingness; feelings of pleasure, anger, guilt, regret, shame, and sympathy; their support for the organization; and how efficacious they expected their support would be. It was found at the bivariate level that support was positively associated with self-transcendence values (universalism, benevolence) and negatively associated with both self-enhancement (power, achievement, hedonism) and security values. A path analysis implied that universalism values influenced support via the justice-related variables of perceived responsibility and undeserved treatment, outcome expectations, negative emotions, and sympathy. This study contributes new information about the effects of values on personal willingness to repair past wrongs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allpress, J. A., Barlow, F. K., Brown, R., & Louis, W. R. (2010). Atoning for colonial injustices: Group-based shame and guilt motivate support for reparation. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augoustinos, M., Ahrens, C., & Innes, J. M. (1994). Stereotypes and prejudice: The Australian experience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 85, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Towards a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndsen, M., & McGarty, C. (2010). The impact of magnitude of harm and perceived difficulty of making reparations on group-based guilt and reparation towards victims of historical harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 500–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1990). Bridging the gap between values and actions. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1992). Values, valences, expectations, and actions. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–73). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996a). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996b). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215–251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2005). Values, religion, and motivation. In M. L. Maehr & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 14, pp. 35–73). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2008). Perceived legitimacy of a promotion decision in relation to deservingness, entitlement, and resentment in the context of affirmative action and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1230–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2008). Values and prejudice: Predictors of attitudes towards Australian Aborigines. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2009). Differentiating emotions in relation to deserved or undeserved outcomes: A retrospective study of real-life events. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 955–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., McKee, I. R., & Bekker, N. (2011). Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Newton, J. W. (1982). Values, expectations, and the prediction of social action: An expectancy-valence analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloran, M. J. (2007). Indigenous reconciliation in Australia: Do values, identity and collective guilt matter? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Pedersen, A. (2004). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group-based emotions. In N. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 262–283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.3. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A. M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, R. M. A., Dijker, A. J. M., & de Vries, N. K. (2007). Emotions and goals: Assessing relations between values and emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 902–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behaviour in organizations] (pp. 56–95). Petropolis, Brazil: Voges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurements, and applications]. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, 47, 249–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, S., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2010). The “shoulds” and “should nots” of moral emotions: A self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 213–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, J. A., Feather, N. T., Zhu, G., & Martin, N. G. (2008). Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental properties of the portrait values questionnaire. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 531–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silfver, M., Helkama, K., Lönnquist, J. E., & Verkasalo, M. (2008). The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starzyk, K. B., & Ross, M. (2008). A tarnished silver lining: Victim suffering and support for reparation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 366–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009a). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 194–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009b). Transforming “apathy into movement”: The role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 310–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2010). Social psychology in making poverty history: Motivating anti-poverty action in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 45, 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three social-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia

    N. T. Feather, Lydia Woodyatt & Ian R. McKee

Authors
  1. N. T. Feather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lydia Woodyatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ian R. McKee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. T. Feather.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feather, N.T., Woodyatt, L. & McKee, I.R. Predicting support for social action: How values, justice-related variables, discrete emotions, and outcome expectations influence support for the Stolen Generations. Motiv Emot 36, 516–528 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9262-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9262-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation