Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

If you plan, then you can: How reflection helps defensive pessimists pursue their goals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines how the two propensities that underlie defensive pessimism (pessimism and reflection) operate independently to influence the defensive pessimistic process. It investigates the hypothesis that the propensity to reflect, or plan, counteracts the detrimental effects of pessimism by encouraging not only planning, but also the pursuit of those plans. Consistent with these predictions, two studies revealed that the propensity to reflect helped defensive pessimists pursue their plans by (a) increasing goal importance, (b) promoting effort, (c) raising initial expectations, and (d) buffering the anticipated sting of failure. Pessimism hindered performance by increasing anxiety and lowering expectations. Thus, the propensity to reflect counteracts pessimism by not only promoting planning, but also processes that help the pursuit of those plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The original measure of defensive pessimism, the defensive pessimism questionnaire (DPQ), sometimes called the Optimism Pessimism Prescreening Questionnaire (OPPQ), did not assess pessimism independently of reflection (Norem and Cantor 1986b). Defensive pessimists reflected about pessimistic outcomes (e.g., I often think about what I would do if I did very poorly in an academic situation), and their counterparts, strategic optimists, reflected about optimistic outcomes (e.g., I often think about what it will be like if I do very well in an academic situation). Consequently, it was impossible to differentiate these two processes. Since then, research has revealed that strategic optimists do not engage in any type of reflection, even thinking about positive outcomes hurts their performance (Spencer and Norem 1996).

  2. Martin and his colleagues argue that it is important to examine defensive expectations, which measure the extent to which individuals adopt a defense posturing in their expectations. They argue that this approach better captures the defensive quality associated with defensive pessimism. Defensive expectations, however, have not been traditionally examined within the research. Thus, we focus on Norem’s conceptualization of the defensive pessimistic process.

  3. Letter grades were transformed into percentile grades by making each letter grade the lowest possible percentile score needed to get that grade (e.g., A = 92, A− = 90, B+ = 88, etc.).

  4. We did not plan on doing any longitudinal analyses because cognitive strategies, like defensive pessimism, are malleable. Norem (2001a) writes that cognitive strategies “… describe important individual differences, they are not assumed to be stable over time and consistent across situations the same way as traditional traits, motives, or styles. Theoretically they are potentially malleable.” pg. 78. In order to be thorough, however, we conducted several basic longitudinal analyses. First, we examined whether pessimism and reflection predicted outcomes at T2. They did have predictive power. Pessimism tended to predict anxiety, β = .18 p = .10, and reflection predicted goal importance, β = .25 p < .05 at T2. Neither of them predicted expectations, perhaps because these later expectations may be heavily influenced by individuals’ actual experiences in the class. It is important to note that these associations did not remain once anxiety and goal importance at T1 were taken into account. We also examined whether the outcome measures at T1 could predict pessimism and reflection at T2 by conducting regressions in which the outcome measures at T1 predicted pessimism and reflection at T2, controlling for pessimism and reflection at T1. No significant results emerged (all p’s >.14).

  5. According to Byrne (2001), RMSEA values less than .05 indicate a good fit, .05 to .08 represent reasonable fit, .08 to .10 indicate mediocre fit, and greater than .10 indicate poor fit.

  6. Past work has examined defensive pessimists’ general affective reactions, which includes positive, as well, as negative emotions (Sanna et al. 2006). In order to make sure that these results generalize to this work, we added the item about happiness.

  7. To examine the link between anxiety and effort for true pessimists and defensive pessimists, we classified respondents based on whether they were low/high in pessimism and reflection. Anxiety was not correlated with effort, r(15) = .35, ns, for true pessimists (high pessimism/low reflection), but anxiety was correlated with effort, r(27) = .36, for true defensive pessimists (high pessimism and reflection). Thus, for true pessimists anxiety did not spark effort, but, it also did not decrease effort. Anxiety may not have decreased effort due to the fact that both variables were measured two days prior to the test. It may be that anxiety’s detrimental effect on effort becomes more apparent as anxiety increases due to the examination becoming more imminent.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). AMOS 6.0 user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS/Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2003). The effects of mindset on behavior: Self-regulation in deliberative and implemental frames of mind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 86–95. doi:10.1177/0146167202238374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M. K. (1985). In Simpson’s contemporary quotations, complied by James B. Simpson (1988). Retrieved October 16, 2003, from http://www.barteby.com/63/91/2091.html.

  • Aspinwall, L. G. (1998). Rethinking the role of positive affect in self-regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 1–32. doi:10.1023/A:1023080224401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, L. G., & Richter, L. (1999). Optimism and self-mastery predict more rapid disengagement from unsolvable tasks in the presence of alternatives. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 221–245. doi:10.1023/A:1021367331817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (1998). The self. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. J., Heimberg, R. G., Frost, R. O., Makris, G. S., Juster, H. R., & Leung, A. W. (1999). Relationship of perfectionism to affect, expectations, attributions and performance in the classroom. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 98–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., & Norem, J. K. (1989). Defensive pessimism and stress and coping. Social Cognition, 7, 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., Norem, J. K., Niedenthal, P. M., Langston, C. A., & Brower, A. M. (1987). Life tasks, self-concept ideals, and cognitive strategies in a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1178–1191. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (2003). A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and self-handicapping. Journal of Personality, 71, 369–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eronen, S., Nurmi, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (1998). Optimistic, defensive -pessimistic, impulsive and self-handicapping strategies in university environments. Learning and Instruction, 8, 159–177. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00015-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1969). Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 129–144. doi:10.1037/h0028071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. The American Psychologist, 7, 493–503. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. R., & Williams, C. R. (1987). Goal importance, self-focus, and the goal-setting process. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 204–211. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87–109. doi:10.1006/jesp.1993.1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. A., & Brown, J. D. (2004). Expectations and realizations: The role of expectancies in achievement settings. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 347–361. doi:10.1007/s11031-004-2388-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2001a). A quadripolar need achievement representation of self-handicapping and defensive pessimism. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 583–610. doi:10.3102/00028312038003583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2001b). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 87–102. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003a). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 1–36. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00008-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Williamson, A., & Debus, R. L. (2003b). Self-handicapping, defensive pessimism, and goal orientation: A qualitative study of university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 617–628. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norem, J. K. (2001a). Defensive pessimism, optimism, and pessimism. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism & pessimism: Implications for theory research and practice (pp. 77–100). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norem, J. K. (2001b). The power of negative thinking: Using defensive pessimism to harness anxiety and perform at your peak. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N. (1986a). Anticipatory and post hoc cushioning strategies: Optimism and defensive pessimism in “risky” situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 347–362. doi:10.1007/BF01173471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N. (1986b). Defensive pessimism: Harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1208–1217. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norem, J. K., & Illingworth, K. S. S. (1993). Strategy-dependent effects of reflecting on self and tasks: Some implications of optimism and defensive pessimism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 822–835. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, E. M., Saxon, J. L., & Oishi, S. (2000). The psychological trade-offs of goal investment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 617–630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyszczynski, T. (1982). Cognitive strategies for coping with uncertain outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 386–399. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(82)90034-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanna, L. J. (1996). Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: Some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1020–1036. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.1020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanna, L. J. (1998). Defensive pessimism, and optimism: The bitter-sweet influence of mood on performance and prefactual and counterfactual thinking. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 635–665. doi:10.1080/026999398379484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanna, L. J. (1999). Mental simulations, affect and subjective confidence: Timing is everything. Psychological Science, 10, 339–345. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanna, L. J., Chang, E. C., Carter, S. E., & Small, E. M. (2006). The future is now: Prospective temporal self-appraisals among defensive pessimists and optimists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 727–739. doi:10.1177/0146167205285896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G. (1980). Test anxiety: Theory research and applications. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., Findley- Klein, C., Kwavnick, K. D., Walker, D., & Perez, S. (2000). Bracing for loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 620–634. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., Ouellette, J. A., & Fernandez, J. K. (1996). Abandoning unrealistic optimism: Performance estimates and the temporal proximity of self-relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 844–855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S. J., Skov, R. B., Hervitz, E. F., & Stock, C. B. (1981). The effects of explaining hypothetical future events: From possibility to probability to actuality and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 142–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showers, C. (1992). The motivational and emotional consequences of considering positive or negative possibilities for an upcoming event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 472–484. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Showers, C., & Ruben, C. (1990). Distinguishing defensive pessimism from depression: Negative expectations and positive coping mechanisms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 385–399. doi:10.1007/BF01172934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. M., & Norem, J. K. (1996). Reflection and distraction: Defensive pessimism, strategic optimism, and performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 354–365. doi:10.1177/0146167296224003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. M., & Shepperd, J. A. (1998). Bracing for the worst: Severity, testing, and feedback timing as moderators of the optimistic bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 915–926. doi:10.1177/0146167298249001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. (1999). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), The self in social psychology (pp. 446–460). Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Elizabeth Pinel and Kristen Eyssell for their helpful feedback. Portions of this paper were presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association in Chicago, Illinois.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 437 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Karen Gasper, Regina H. Lozinski & Lavonia Smith LeBeau

Authors
  1. Karen Gasper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Regina H. Lozinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lavonia Smith LeBeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Gasper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gasper, K., Lozinski, R.H. & LeBeau, L.S. If you plan, then you can: How reflection helps defensive pessimists pursue their goals. Motiv Emot 33, 203–216 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9125-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9125-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation