Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Shear Creep Behavior of an Adhesive Resin System at the Interface Between an Orthodontic Bracket and Enamel

  • Published:
Mechanics of Composite Materials Aims and scope

Creeping of a resin-composite-based interface between the enamel and an orthodontic bracket was investigated using two testing setups — tooth-bracket and three-point bending ones. Orthodontic brackets were bonded onto an etched enamel surface using various resin composites. A static load was applied to the bracket-tooth, and the time required to debond it from the tooth surface was recorded. In the three-point bending test, the creep and recovery of the resin composite materials were tested using rectangular test specimens. It was found that the incorporation of continuous glass fibers at the interface between the orthodontic bracket and enamel increased the creeping and debonding time of the brackets

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. K. Goertzen and M. R. Kessler, “Creep behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 421, No. 1, 217-225 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. U. Zachrisson, “Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers: update and clinical advice,” J.Clinical Orthodontics, 41, No. 12, 728 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Bales, “Deformation of Reinforced Polycarbonate Orthodontic Brackets Stressed by a Labiolingual Moment, University of Manitoba (1998).

  4. S.Garoushi, et al., “Creep of experimental short fiber-reinforced composite resin,” Dent. Mater. J. 31, No. 5, 737-741 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Shinya, et al., “Enhanced degree of monomer conversion of orthodontic adhesives using a glass-fiber layer under the bracket,” The Angle Orthodontist, 79, No. 3, 546-550 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Garoushi, et al., “Load bearing capacity of fibre-reinforced and particulate filler composite resin combination,” J. Dent., 34, No. 3, 179-184 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Ilday and N. Seven, “The influence of different fiber-reinforced composites on shear bond strengths when bonded to enamel and dentin structures,” J. Dent. Sci., 6, No. 2, 107-115 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. C. Petersen, “Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composites above critical length,” J. Dent. Res., 84, No. 4, 365-370 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Turkaslan, et al., “Effect of fiber-reinforced composites on the failure load and failure mode of composite veneers,” Dent. Mater. J., 28, No. 5, 530-536 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. P. E.Tacken, et al., “Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study,” Eur. J. of Orthodontics, 32, No. 2, 117-123 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Bolla, et al., “Failure evaluation after a 6-year retention period: A comparison between glass fiber-reinforced (GFR) and multistranded bonded retainers,” Int. Orthodontics, 10, No. 1, 16-28 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. F. Sfondrini, et al., “Bending properties of fiber-reinforced composites retainers bonded with spot-composite coverage,” BioMed Research International, 8469090 (2017).

  13. T. M. Lastumaki, L. V. Lassila, and P.K. Vallittu, “The semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix of fiber-reinforced composite and its effect on the surface adhesive properties,” J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 14, No. 9, 803-809 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Pastila, et al., “Effect of short-term water storage on the elastic properties of some dental restorative materials-A resonant ultrasound spectroscopy study,” Dent. Mater., 23, No. 7, 878-884 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. K. Vallittu, “Interpenetrating polymer Networks (IPNs) in dental polymers and composites,” J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 23, Nos. 7-8, 961-972 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Kilponen, et al., “Effect of removal of enamel on rebonding strength of resin composite to enamel,” BioMed Research International, 7 (2016).

  17. L. Kilponen, et al., “Photopolymerization of light curing adhesives used with metal orthodontic brackets and matrices,” J. Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, 6, No. 8, 659-664 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Shinya, et al., “Treated enamel surface patterns associated with five orthodontic adhesive systems-surface morphology and shear bond strength,” Dent. Mater. J., 27, No. 1, 1-6 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B. H. Durgesh, et al., “Damage of the interface between an orthodontic bracket and enamel – the effect of some elastic properties of the adhesive material,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 51, No. 6, 805-812 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. H. Durgesh, et al., “Photo initiated curing of bracket adhesive by light transmission through glass fibers,” J. Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, 5, No. 5, 411-416 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Vaidyanathan and T. K. Vaidyanathan, “Flexural creep deformation and recovery in dental composites,” J. Dent., 29, No. 8, 545-551 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. G. Alkire, et al., “Torsional creep of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets,” Dent. Mater., 13, No. 1, 2-6 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. J. Dobrin, I. L. Kamel, and D. R. Musich, “Load-deformation characteristics of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets,” Am. J. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 67, No. 1, 24-33 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Papadogiannis, et al., “Viscoelastic properties of orthodontic adhesives used for lingual fixed retainer bonding,” Dent. Mater., 33, No. 1, e22-e27 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Valletta, et al., “Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems,” Eur. J. Orthodontics, 29, No. 6, 571-577 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Baccetti, et al., “Forces produced by different nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of apically displaced teeth,” The Angle Orthodontist, 79, No. 3, 533-539 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Matarese, et al., “Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 133, No. 5, 708-715 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. A. Montasser, et al., “Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets,” Am. J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 143, No. 4, 507-514 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Weinstein, “Minimal forces in tooth movement,” Am. J. Orthodontics, 53, No. 12, 881-903 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. V. J. Lassila, et al., “The bond strength of particulate-filler composite to differently oriented fiber-reinforced composite substrate,” J. of Prosthodontics : Official J. Am. College of Prosthodontists, 16, No. 1, 10-17 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Tezvergil, L. V. Lassila, and P. K. Vallittu, “Strength of adhesive-bonded fiber-reinforced composites to enamel and dentin substrates,” J. Adhes. Dent., 5, No. 4, 301-311 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Tezvergil, L. V. J. Lassila, and P. K. Vallittu, “The shear bond strength of bidirectional and random-oriented fibrereinforced composite to tooth structure,” J. Dent., 33, No. 6, 509-516 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. P. K. Vallittu, “High-aspect ratio fillers: fiber-reinforced composites and their anisotropic properties,” Dent. Mater., 31, No. 1, 1-7 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. T. K. Vaidyanathan, J. Vaidyanathan, and D. Arghavani, “Elastic, viscoelastic and viscoplastic contributions to compliance during deformation under stress in prosthodontic temporization materials,” Acta Biomater. Odontol. Scand., 2, No. 1, 108-117 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors extend their appreciation to the deanship of scientific research at King Khalid University for funding this research work. Authors thank the BioCity Turku Biomaterials and Medical Device Research Program (www.biomaterials.utu.fi).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University and Department of Biomaterials Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    B. H. Durgesh

  2. Dental Health Department, Dental Biomaterials Research Chair, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    A. A. Alkheraif

  3. General Dentist, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    M. K. Altwijry

  4. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    M. A. Asiry

  5. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    I. AlShahrani

  6. Department of Oral Development and Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku and City of Turku Welfare Division, Oral Health Care, Turku, Finland

    J. Varrela

  7. Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre-TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku and City of Turku Welfare Division, Oral Health Care, Turku, Finland

    P. K. Vallittu

  8. King Saud University, Visiting Professor Program, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    P. K. Vallittu

Authors
  1. B. H. Durgesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Alkheraif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. K. Altwijry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. A. Asiry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. AlShahrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Varrela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P. K. Vallittu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. H. Durgesh.

Additional information

Russian translation published in Mekhanika Kompozitnykh Materialov, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 389-402, March-April, 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durgesh, B.H., Alkheraif, A.A., Altwijry, M.K. et al. Shear Creep Behavior of an Adhesive Resin System at the Interface Between an Orthodontic Bracket and Enamel. Mech Compos Mater 55, 275–284 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-019-09811-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-019-09811-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation