Abstract
Climate change disproportionately impacts socially and economically marginalized populations. To rectify this imbalance, adaptation plans can explicitly include projects that not only lower the threat for these populations but also may provide co-benefits that improve the quality of their lives. One method to evaluate these co-benefits or any additional costs to these populations in the analysis of adaptation options is to monetize them. Monetization will convert these generally non-market impacts into monetary units and allow them to compared with each other as well as other market impacts in benefit–cost analyses. The monetized values can also be weighted by the utility of these benefits and costs to the different socio-economic groups in a population. Using illustrative case studies in two areas of Boston USA with different socio-economic conditions but similar population sizes and flood threats, this evaluation approach is tested when using nature-based solutions (NBS) to lower flood threats. The non-market benefits and costs included are improved air quality, availability of public transportation, recreational space, rent escalation due to gentrification, and prevented loss of wages due to reduction in mental stress. Utility is an inverse function of annual income. The case studies illustrate that by quantifying the non-market impacts the value of including adaptation actions that promote climate justice co-benefits can be shown.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: Stroud (2020)
Source: city of Boston (2017)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
American Community Survey (2017). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acsreference
Barankin R, Portman, Kirshen P, Bowen R (2021) Evidence-driven approach for assessing social vulnerability and equality during extreme climatic events. Frontiers in Water, January 22, 2021
Bhatia R. (2014) Case study: San Francisco’s use of neighborhood indicators to encourage healthy urban development. Health Affairs, 33(11), https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0661m
Black Congressional Caucus (2004) African Americans and climate change: an unequal burden. Retrieved from https://23u0pr24qn4zn4d4qinlmyh8-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/CBCF_REPORT_F.pdf
Bulkeley H, Edwards GAS, Fuller S (2014) Contesting climate justice in the city: examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environmental Change, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019 Employer costs for employee compensation- September 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020) Occupational employment and wages in Boston-Cambridge-Nashua May 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/regions/new-england/news-release/2020/occupationalemploymentandwages_boston_20200819.htm.
Calderon-Argelich A, Benetti S, Anguelovski I, Connolly J, Langemeyer J, Baro F (2021) Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem service literature: a systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning 214(2021)
Chambwera M, Heal G, Dubeux C, Hallegatte S, Leclerc L, Markandya A, McCarl B, Mechler R, Neumann J (2014) Economics of adaptation in climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 945–977
City of Boston (2016a) Climate ready Boston final report, Boston MA, December 2016a
City of Boston (2106b) Approach and methodology for asset data collection and exposure and consequence analysis climate ready Boston, Boston MA 2016
City of Boston (2017) Coastal resilience solutions for East Boston and Charlestown, Boston MA, October 2017.
City of Boston (2018) Coastal resilience solutions for South Boston: final report, Boston MA, October 2018.
Costanza R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
DeNeufville R (1990) Applied systems analysis: engineering planning and technology management, Mc-Graw-Hill.
Douglas E, Kirshen P, Paolisso M, Watson C, Wiggin J, Enrici A, Ruth M (2012) Coastal flooding, climate change, and environmental justice: identifying obstacles and incentives for adaptation in two Metropolitan Boston communities. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 17(5):573–562
Drupp MA, Freeman M C, Groom B, Nesje F (2015) Discounting disentangled: an expert survey on determinants of the long-term social discount rate (No. 195). Retrieved from https://www.cccep.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Working-Paper-172-Drupp-et-al.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2017) National Highway Travel Survey. Retrieved from https://nhts.ornl.gov/
Floater G, Heecky C, Ulterino M, Mackie L, Rode P (2016) Co-benefits of urban climate action: a framework for cities. Economics of Green Cities Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://www.c40.org/researches/c40-lse-cobenefits
Foremost Insurance Group (2014) “2014 Landlord market facts study”. Presentation. Retrieved from https://cp.foremost.com/market-facts/9012548-landlord-market-facts-2014.pdf
Giles-Corti B, Broomhall M, Knuiman M, Collins C, Douglas K, Ng K, Lange A, Donovan R (2005) Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), pg 169–176
Harnik P, Welle B. (2009) Measuring the economic value of a city park system. The Trust for Public Land. http://cloud.tpl.org/pubs/ccpe-econvalueparks-rpt.pdf
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2022) Technical summary: climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the IPCC, . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Jones SH (2017) Greater than the sum of its parts: the Integration Of Environmental Justice Advocacy And Economic Policy Analysis. NYU Envtl LJ 26:402
Kennedy M, Leonard P (2001) Dealing with neighborhood change: a primer on gentrification and policy choices. The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy
Kind J, Wouten Botzen WJ, Aerts J (2017) Accounting for risk aversion, income distribution and social welfare in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management. WIREs Climate Change 17. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.446
Kirshen P, Merrill S, Slovinsky P, Richardson N (2012) Simplified method for scenario-based risk assessment adaptation planning in the coastal zone. Climatic change 113:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0379-z
Kirshen P, Ballestero T, Douglas E, Hesed C, Ruth M, Paolisso M, Watson C, Giffee P, Vermeer K, Bosma K (2018) Engaging vulnerable populations in multi-level stakeholder collaborative urban adaptation planning for extreme events and climate risks – a case study of East Boston USA. Journal of Extreme Events 2018, FirstOnline. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737618500136
Kirshen P, Borrelli M, Byrnes J, Chen R, Lockwood L, Watson C, Starbuck K, Wiggin J, Novelly A, Uiterwyk K, Thurson K, McMann B, Foster C, Sprague H, Roberts H, Jin D, Bosma K, Holmes E, Strummer Z, Famely J, Shaw A, Hoffnagle B, Herst R (2020) (2020) Integrated assessment of storm surge barrier systems under present and future climates and comparison to alternatives; a case study of Boston USA. Clim Change 162(2):445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02781-8
Kuhl L, Kirshen P, Ruth M, Douglas E (2014) Evacuation as a climate adaptation strategy for environmental justice communities. Clim Change 127(3–4):493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1273-2
Lawrence F, Kerr J, Sallis J (2007) Urban form relationships with walk trip frequency and distance among youth. Am J Health Promot 21:305–311
Lempert R, Arnold J, Pulwarty R, Gordon K, Greig K, Hawkins Hoffman C, Sands D, Werrell C (2018) Reducing risks through adaptation actions. In impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1309–1345. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH28
Litman T (2019) Evaluating public transit benefits and costs: best practices guidebook.Victoria Transport Policy Institute. https://www.vtpi.org/tranben.pdf
Magan AK, Schipper E, Burkett M, Bharwani S, Burton I, Eriksen S, Gemenne F, Schaar J, Ziervogel G (2016) Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. Wires Clim Change 2016(7):646–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.409
Malloy J (2021) Implementing socially just climate adaptation: a case study of Boston, Massachusetts. PhD Thesis, Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham NH
Malloy J, and Ashcraft C (2020) A framework for implementing socially just climate adaptation. Climatic Change 160, pages1–14
Makri A, Stilianakis N (2008) Vulnerability to air pollution health effects. International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health 211:326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.06.005
Martin A (2015) A framework to understand the relationship between social factors that reduce resilience in cities: application to the City of Boston. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.12.001
Newell P, Srivastava S, Naess LO, Torres Contreras GA, Price R (2021). Toward transformative climate justice: an emerging research agenda. WIREs Climate Change, 12(6)
Nowak D (1994). Air pollution removal by Chicago’s urban forest. USDA Forest Service General Technical. Report, NE-186. Retrieved from https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_ne186.pdf
Nowak D, Heisler G (2010) “Air quality effects on urban trees and parks” Research Series National Recreation And Park Association
Pinoncely V (2016) Poverty, place and inequality: why place-based approaches are key to tackling poverty and inequality. Retrieved from www.rtpi.org.uk
Pizzol M, Weidema B, Brandao M, Osset P (2015) Monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 86.170–179
Ramboll (2019) Co-benefits & climate justice: making the case for climate, adaptation. https://ramboll.com/-/media/files/rgr/documents/markets/water/c/co-benefit-14-06-2019.pdf?la=en
Raymonda C, Frantzeskakib N, Kabischc N, Berryd P, Breile M, Nitaf M, Genelettig D, Calfapietrah C (2017) A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environ Sci Policy 7:15–24
Richardson T (2019) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved 2019 from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr-edge-frm-asst-sec-061118.html
Rigolon A, Németh J (2018) “We’re not in the business of housing”: Environmental gentrification and the nonprofitization of green infrastructure projects. Cities 81:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.016
Schinasi L, Kanungo C, Christman Z, Barber, Tabb L, Headen I (2022) Associations between historical redlining and present-day heat vulnerability housing and land cover characteristics in Philadelphia. PA, Journal of Urban Health 99:134–145
Schwartz J (2004) Air pollution and children’s health. Pediatrics April 2004, 113.4 (Supplement 3) 1037–1043. Retrieved from https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/113/Supplement_3/1037.full.pdf
Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A, Turner B (2020) Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc b: Biol Sci 375(1794):20190120
Shi L (2020) From progressive cities to resilient cities: lessons from history for new debates in equitable adaptation to climate change. Urban Affairs Rev 57(5):1442–1479
Shi L, Chu E, Anguelovski I, Aylett A, Debats J, Goh K, VanDeveer S (2016) Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nat Clim Chang 6:131–137
Stern N (2007) Economic modelling of climate-change impacts in the economics of climate change: the stern review (pp. 161–190,Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434.012
Stroud H (2020) Accounting for equity in climate adaptation planning: a quantitative assessment of co-benefits for green infrastructure, master of science thesis, school for the environment, University of Massachusetts Boston, May 2020
Sutton-Grier A, Wowk K, Bamford H (2015) Future of our coasts: the potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems. Environmental Science and Policy, April 2015
Tajima K (2003) New estimates of the demand for urban green space: implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston’s Big Dig project. J Urban Aff 25(5):641–655
The Nature Conservancy (2017) Living shorelines in New England: state of the practice. Boston MA July.
The Trust for Public Land (2009) Measuring the economic value of a city park system. San Francisco CA
The Trust for Public Land (2019) The 10 minute walk, retrieved from https://www.tpl.org/10minutewalk
Tozera L, Hörschelmannb K, Anguelovskic I, Bulkeleya H, Lazovab Y (2020) Whose city? Whose nature? Towards inclusive nature-based solution governance. Cities, Volume 107, December 2020
van Zanten B, Arkema K, Swannack T, Griffin R, Narayan S, Penn K, Reguero B, Samonte G, Scyphers S, Codner-Smith E, IJff S, Kress M, Lemay M (2021) Chapter 6: benefits and costs of NNBF. In International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management. Edited by T. S. Bridges, J. K. King, J. D. Simm, M. W. Beck, G. Collins, Q. Lodder, and R. K. Mohan. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center
Vogel J, Carney KM, Smith JB, Herrick C, Stults M, O’Grady M, St.Juliana A, Hosterman H, Giangola L (2016) Climate adaptation: the state of practice in U.S. Communities. Retrieved from https://kresge.org/sites/default/files/library/climate-adaptation-the-state-of-practice-in-us-communities-full-report.pdf
United States Census Bureau (2019) Quickfacts Boston city, Massachusetts. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
Wolf KL (2010) Community economics - a literature review. In: green cities: good health (www.greenhealth.washington.edu). College of the Environment, University of Washington.
Zandvoort M, Kooijmans N, Kirshen P, van den Brink A (2019) Designing with pathways: a spatial design approach for adaptive and sustainable landscapes, special issue “policy pathways for sustainability, sustainability, 11(3), January 2019
Acknowledgements
Funding from the University of Massachusetts Boston, Coasts & Communities Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) at the University of Massachusetts Boston, and the Stone Living Lab supported the authors at various times. Initial conversations with Ramboll, Boston on this topic were appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. HS carried out the research and prepared the first draft. PK and DT did significant article re-drafting and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Stroud, H.M., Kirshen, P.H. & Timmons, D. Monetary evaluation of co-benefits of nature-based flood risk reduction infrastructure to promote climate justice. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 28, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-022-10037-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-022-10037-2