Skip to main content
Log in

Why physicians have authority over patients

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we argue that physicians have normative authority over patients. First we elaborate on the nature of normative authority. We then examine and critique Arthur Isak Applbaum’s view that physicians lack authority over patients. Our argument appeals to four cases that demonstrate physicians’ authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. 1986, 44.

  2. ibid.

  3. Alternatively, we can imagine a physician ordering a patient to receive a vaccination. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the US Supreme Court upheld the right of states to enforce compulsory vaccination.

  4. Case 3 is actually fairly commonplace, as any physician who works in a hospital will tell you. Nevertheless, it is certainly true that instances of Case 3 occur less often than Case 4.

  5. We should note that Applbaum defines authority as the “normative power to govern, where a normative power is the ability, in some context, to change the normative situation of others – their rights and duties, permissions, and restrictions,” (209). The duty-based view of authority we endorse is consistent with Applbaum’s, since duties are a kind of normative liability. Therefore, if we successfully demonstrate that physicians impose duties, then they must have authority even on Applbaum’s own terms.

  6. Of course, Vice-Principal Campbell and other senior administrators have ultimate authority over students. They can discipline Anne if, for instance, she is causing a commotion in the hallway, even when she has the hall pass, and they can rescind the rule permitting holl monitors to grant other students permission to use the bathroom.

References

  • Anonymized for Blind Review. 2019. Responding to religious patients: Why physicians have no business doing theology. Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11): 705–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applbaum, A.I. 2017. The idea of Legitimate Authority in the practice of medicine. AMA Journal of Ethics 19 (2): 207–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, Tom, "Authority", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/authority

  • Emanuel, Ezekiel, and Linda Emanuel. 1992. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 267 (16): 2221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flathman, R. E. 1982. Power, authority, and rights in the practice of medicine. In Responsibility in Health Care (pp. 105–125). Springer, Dordrecht. Pg. 109

  • Lych, Holly Fernandez. 2010. Conflicts of conscience in health care. Chapter Two: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. 1986. The morality of freedom. Chapter Two: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Hubbard.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greenblum, J., Hubbard, R. Why physicians have authority over patients. Med Health Care and Philos 25, 541–544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10083-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10083-2

Keywords

Navigation