Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The dual role of human dignity in bioethics

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that some of the misunderstandings surrounding the meaning and function of the concept of human dignity in bioethics arise from a lack of distinction between two different roles that this notion plays: one as an overarching policy principle, and the other as a moral standard of patient care. While the former is a very general concept which fulfils a foundational and a guiding role of the normative framework governing biomedical issues, the latter reflects a much more concrete and context-specific understanding of the patient as a “person”. The importance of dignity as a policy principle will be described by appealing to the distinction between principles and rules as developed by some legal philosophers. The value of dignity as a standard of patient care will be illustrated with the help of concrete examples and by drawing on the taxonomies of dignity proposed by Jonathan Mann and other scholars. The overall scope of the article is to highlight this double and complementary role of human dignity in bioethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexy, R. 1994. Theorie der Grundrechte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, K. 2003. Dignity as tacit. BMJ Rapid Responses. Available online at: http://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/dignity-tacit. Accessed 13 Dec 2011.

  • Andorno, R. 2009. Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34(3): 223–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, L. 2009. Patient dignity in an acute hospital setting: A case study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 46(1): 23–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, A. 2003. Indignities, respect for persons, and the vagueness of human dignity. BMJ Rapid Responses. Available online at: http://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/indignities-respect-persons-and-vagueness-human-dignity. Accessed 13 Dec 2011.

  • Chochinov, H.M. 2002. Dignity-conserving care. A new model for palliative care. Helping the patient feel valued. Journal of the American Medical Association 287(17): 2253–2260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N. 2003. Dignity is fundamental. BMJ Rapid Responses. Available online at: http://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/human-dignity-fundamental. Accessed 13 Dec 2011.

  • Helgesson, G., and S. Eriksson. 2008. Against the principle that the individual shall have priority over science. Journal of Medical Ethics 34(1): 54–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. 2009. A taxonomy of dignity: a grounded theory study. BMC International Health and Human Rights 9 (3):1–9. Available online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/3.

  • Lenoir, N., and B. Mathieu. 2004. Les normes internationales de la bioéthique. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. 1998. Dignity and health: the UDHR’s revolutionary first article. Health and Human Rights 3(2): 30–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. 2003. Dignity is a useless concept. British Medical Journal 327: 1419–1420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matiti, M., and G. Trorey. 2008. Patients’ expectations of the maintenance of their dignity. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17: 2709–2717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. 1999. Towards an ethic of global responsibility. In Human rights in global politics, ed. N.J. Dunne, and T. Wheeler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, J. 1987. Making sense of human rights: philosophical reflections on the universal declaration of human rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. 2010. The moral primacy of the human being. Journal of Medical Ethics 36(9): 563–566.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. 2008. The lived experience of human dignity. In: US President’s Council on Bioethics (ed) Human dignity and bioethics. Washington: US Government Printing Office: 513–539.

  • Rawls, J. 1973. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulmasy, D. 2007. Human dignity and human worth. In Perspectives on human dignity: a conversation, ed. J. Malpas, and N. Lickiss, 9–18. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. 2003. Reductio ad absurdum (Rapid Response to Ruth Macklin. Dignity is a useless concept. British Medical Journal 327: 1419–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Roberto Andorno

Authors
  1. Roberto Andorno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Andorno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andorno, R. The dual role of human dignity in bioethics. Med Health Care and Philos 16, 967–973 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9373-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9373-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation