Skip to main content
Log in

Resourcifying human bodies – Kant and bioethics

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay roughly sketches two major conceptions of autonomy in contemporary bioethics that promote the resourcification of human body parts: (1) a narrow conception of autonomy as self-determination; and (2) the conception of autonomy as dissociated from human dignity. In this paper I will argue that, on the one hand, these two conceptions are very different from that found in the modern European tradition of philosophical inquiry, because bioethics has concentrated on an external account of patient’s self-determination and on dissociating dignity from internal human nature. However, on the other hand, they are consistent with more recent European philosophy. In this more recent tradition, human dignity has gradually been dissociated from contextual values, and human subjectivity has been dissociated from objectivity and absolutized as never to be objectified. In the concluding part, I will give a speculative sketch in which Kant’s internal inquiry of maxim of ends, causality and end, and dignity as irreplaceability is recombined with bioethics’ externalized one and used to support an extended human resourcification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • K. Bayertz (1995) ArticleTitle‘Die Idee der Menschenwürde, Probleme und Paradoxien’ Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie 81 IssueID4 465–481

    Google Scholar 

  • T.L. Beauchamp J.F. Childress (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Daniels (1985) Just Health Care Cambridge University Press New York 2

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Duffin (1999) History of Medicine: A Scandalously Short Introduction University of Toronto Press Toronto 171

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Heidegger (1962) ‘Question Concerning Technology’ W. Lovitt (Eds) 1977, Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays Harper and Row New York 3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Howard J. Najarian (1978) ‘Organ Transplantation: Medical Perspective’ W.T. Reich (Eds) Encyclopedia of Bioethics Free Press New York 1160

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I.: 1781, Critique of Pure Reason: in P. Guyer and A.E. Wood (eds.), 1998, New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 224.

  • I. Kant (1785) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals M.J. Gregor (Eds) 1996, Practical Philosophy Cambridge University Press New York 37–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I.: 1788, Critique of Practical Reason, in: M. Gregor (ed.), 1996, op.cit. pp. 133–271.

  • Kant I.: 1790, Critique of the Power of Judgment, in: P. Guyer and E. Matthews ed., 2000, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 244–245.

  • I. Kant (1797) ‘The Metaphysics of Morals’ M. Gregor (Eds) 1996, Practical Philosophy Cambridge University Press New York 353–603

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Morioka (2001) ArticleTitle‘Reconsidering Brain Death–A Lesson from Japan’s Fifteen Years of Experience -’ Hastings Center Report 31 IssueID4 41–46 Occurrence Handle12945466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Simpson E.S.C. Weiner (Eds) (1989) The Oxford English Dictionary EditionNumber2 Clarendon Press Oxford 28

    Google Scholar 

  • G.E Pence (2003) Classic Cases in Medical Ethics: Accounts of Cases That Have Shaped Medical Ethics, with Philosophical, Legal, and Historical Backgrounds McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Rendtorff (2002) ArticleTitle‘Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability–Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 5 235–244 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021132602330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Secker (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Appearance of Kant’s Deontology in Contemporary Kantianism: Concepts of Patient Autonomy in Bioethics’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 IssueID1 43–66 Occurrence Handle10.1076/jmep.24.1.43.2544 Occurrence Handle10223442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (U.S.A.): 1979, The Belmont Report–Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miyasaka, M. Resourcifying human bodies – Kant and bioethics. Med Health Care Philos 8, 19–27 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0103-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0103-8

Keywords

Navigation