Abstract
Recent advances in genomic research have led to the development of new diagnostic tools, including tests which make it possible to predict the future occurrence of monogenetic diseases (e.g. Chorea Huntington) or to determine increased susceptibilities to the future development of more complex diseases (e.g. breast cancer). The use of such tests raises a number of ethical, legal and social issues which are usually discussed in terms of rights. However, in the context of predictive genetic tests a key question arises which lies beyond the concept of rights, namely, What should we want to know about our future? In the following I shall discuss this question against the background of Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue. It will be demonstrated that the system of duties of virtue that Kant elaborates in the second part of his Metaphysics of Morals offers a theoretical framework for addressing the question of a proper scope of future knowledge as provided by genetic tests. This approach can serve as a source of moral guidance complementary to a justice perspective. It does, however, not rest on the – rather problematic – claim to be able to define what the “good life” is.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L.B. Andrews J.E. Fullarton N.A. Holtzman A.G. Motulsky (1994) Assessing Genetic Risk. Implications for Health and Social Policy National Academy Press Washington, D.C.
E.W. Almqvist M. Bloch R. Brinkman D. Craufurd M.R. Hayden (1999) ArticleTitle‘A Worldwide Assessment of the Frequency of Suicide, Suicide Attempts, or Psychiatric Hospitalization after Predictive Testing for Huntington Disease’ American Journal of Human Genetics 64 1293–1304 Occurrence Handle10.1086/302374 Occurrence Handle10205260
R. Chadwick D. M. Levitt Shickle (Eds) (1997) The Right to Know and the Right not to Know Ashgate Aldershot
Council of Europe: 1997, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. <URL:http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/html/164.htm>.
InstitutionalAuthorNameDeutsches Referenzzentrum für Ethik in den Biowissenschaften (2001) Dossier Postnatale prädiktive Gentests DRZE Bonn
M. Gregor (1963) Laws of Freedom. A Study of Kant’s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the ‘Metaphysik der Sitten’ Blackwell Oxford
M. Gregor (1990) ‘Kants System der Pflichten in der Metaphysik der Sitten’ I. Kant (Eds) 1990, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre Meiner Hamburg XXIX–LXV
J. Habermas (1991) Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik Suhrkamp Frankfurt
I. Kant (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. IV Georg Reimer Berlin 385–463
I. Kant (1786) Mutmaßlicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. VIII Georg Reimer Berlin 107–123
I. Kant (1788) Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. V Georg Reimer Berlin 1–163
I. Kant (1794) Der Streit der Fakultäten. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. VII Georg Reimer Berlin 1–116
I. Kant (1795) Zum ewigen Frieden. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. VIII Georg Reimer Berlin 341–386
I. Kant (1797) Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. VI Georg Reimer Berlin 203–549
I. Kant (1938) Handschriftlicher Nachlaß. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. XXII Walter de Gruyter Berlin
Ch. Korsgaard (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends Cambridge University Press Cambridge
National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature: 2002, Scope Note 22: Genetic Testing and Genetic Screening. <URL:http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/scopenotes/ sn22.htm>.
O. Nell (O’Neill) (1975) Acting on Principles. An Essay on Kantian Ethics Columbia University Press New York
J. Rawls (1999) A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition Oxford University Press Oxford
Republic of Austria: 1994/2002, Gentechnikgesetz. <URL:http://www.bmbwk.gv.at/forschung/recht/ gentechnik/Forschungsrecht_Gentechn3976.xml>.
The Danish Council of Ethics: 2001, Genetic investigation of Healthy Subjects–Report on Presymptomatic Gene Diagnosis. <URL:http://etisk.inforce.dk/graphics/ 03-udgivelser/engelske-publikationer/genetic/ren.htm>.
M. Timmons (Eds) (2002) Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays Oxford University Press Oxford
Y. Unna (2003) ArticleTitle‘Kant’s Answers to the Casuistical Questions Concerning Self-Disembodiment’ Kant-Studien 94 454–473
A.W. Wood (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heinrichs, B. What should we want to know about our future? A Kantian view on predictive genetic testing. Med Health Care Philos 8, 29–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0101-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0101-x