Abstract
The right to genetic privacy is presently being incorporated in legal systems all over the world. It remains largely unclear however what interests and values this right serves to protect. There are many different arguments made in the literature, yet none takes into account the problem of how particular values can be justified given the plurality of moral and religious doctrines in our societies. In this article theories of public reason are used in order to explore how genetic privacy could be justified in a way that is sensitive to the “fact of pluralism”. The idea of public reason is specified as the idea that governments should appeal only to values and beliefs that are acceptable to all reasonable citizens in the justification of rights. In examining prevalent arguments for genetic privacy – based on the value of autonomy or on the value of intimacy – it is concluded that they do not meet this requirement. In dealing with this deficiency in the literature, an argument is developed that genetic privacy is fundamental to the democratic participation of all citizens. By referring to the preconditions of democratic citizenship, genetic privacy can be justified in a way that respects the plurality of comprehensive doctrines of morality and religion in contemporary societies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Ainslie (2002) ArticleTitle‘Bioethics and the Problem of Pluralism’ Social Philosophy and Policy 19 IssueID2 1–28 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0265052502192016 Occurrence Handle12678080
A. Allen (1997) Genetic Privacy: Emerging Concepts and Values M. Rothstein (Eds) Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era Yale University Press New Haven
G. Annas (1999) ArticleTitle‘Genetic Privacy: There Ought to be a Law’ Texas Review of Law & Policy 4 9–15
E. Benda (2000) ArticleTitle‘Fifty years of German Basic Law. The New Departure for Germany’ SMU Law Review 53 443–454
E. Bloustein (1964) ArticleTitle‘Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser’ New York University Law Review 39 962–1007
D. Brock (1996) Public Moral Discourse L.W. Summer J. Boyle (Eds) Philosophical Perspectives in Bioethics University of Toronto Press Toronto
M. Burgess (2001) ArticleTitle‘Beyond Consent: Ethical and Social Issues in Genetic Testing’ Nature Reviews. Genetics 2 147–151 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35052579 Occurrence Handle11253055
J. Childress (1990) ArticleTitleThe Place of Autonomy in Bioethics Hastings Center Report Jan/Feb 12–17
J. Feinberg (1982) ArticleTitle‘Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Privacy: Moral Ideals in the Constitution?’ Notre Dame Law Review 58 445–492
L. Gostin (1995) ArticleTitle‘Genetic Privacy’ Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 23 320–330
A. Gutmann D. Thompson (1997) ArticleTitle‘Deliberating about Bioethics’ Hastings Center Report 27 IssueID3 38–41
J. Husted J. Goldman (2002) ArticleTitle‘Genetics and Privacy’ American Journal of Law and Medicine 28 285–307 Occurrence Handle12197466
P. Kim (2002) ArticleTitle‘Genetic Discrimination, Genetic Privacy: Rethinking Employee Protections for a Brave New World’ Northwestern University Law Review 96 IssueID4 1497–1552 Occurrence Handle15162815
G. Laurie (2002) Genetic Privacy. A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms Cambridge University Press Cambridge
T. MacGleenan (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Jurisprudence of Genetic Privacy’ Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 225–233
Powers, M.: 1997, ‘Justice and Genetics: Privacy Protection and the Moral Basis of Public Policy’, in: M. Rothstein, ibid.
J. Rawls (1993) Political Liberalism Columbia University Press New York
Rothstein, M.: 1997, ‘The Law of Medical and Genetic Privacy in the Workplace’, in: M. Rothstein, ibid.
P. Sankar (2003) ArticleTitle‘Genetic Privacy’ Annual Review of Medicine 54 393–407 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152131 Occurrence Handle12525680
A. Sommerville V. English (1999) ArticleTitle‘Genetic Privacy: Orthodoxy or Oxymoron?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 25 144–150 Occurrence Handle10226920
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beckman, L. Democracy and genetic privacy: The value of bodily integrity. Med Health Care Philos 8, 97–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-004-4020-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-004-4020-z