Skip to main content
Log in

Jeremy Howick: The philosophy of evidence-based medicine

Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK, 2011, 229 pp, $58.95 (paperback), ISBN: 9781405196673

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Ken Goodman’s 2003 book, Ethics and Evidence-Based Medicine [2], does consider some epistemological questions, though its focus is primarily on ethical questions.

  2. He does discuss in some detail several specific papers, including work by John Worrall [3] and by Federica Russo and John Williamson [4].

  3. More correctly, the hierarchy is one of methods, or study designs, rather than of the evidence provided by the studies themselves.

  4. The EBM text referred to is Sackett et al. [8].

References

  1. Howick, Jeremy. 2011. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodman, Kenneth E. 2003. Ethics and evidence-based medicine: Fallibility and responsibility in clinical science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Worrall, John. 2002. What evidence in evidence-based medicine? Philosophy of Science 3(Suppl): S316–S330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Russo, Federica, and Jon Williamson. 2007. Interpreting causality in the health sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21: 1157–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. 1992. Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 268: 2420–2425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guyatt, Gordon, and Drummond Rennie, eds. 2001. Users’ guide to the medical literature. Chicago: AMA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sackett, David L., William M. Rosenberg, J.A. Gray, R. Bryan Haynes, and William S. Richardson. 1996. Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 312: 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett, David L., William S. Richardson, William Rosenberg, and R. Bryan Haynes. 1997. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 1st ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman, Jason, and Fiona J. Mackenzie. 2005. The randomized-controlled trial: Gold standard or merely standard? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48(4): 516–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cartwright, Nancy, and Eileen Munro. 2010. The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness. Journal of Evaluation of Clinical Practice 16(2): 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Worrall, John. 2010. Evidence: Philosophy of science meets medicine. Journal of Evaluation of Clinical Practice 16(2): 356–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. LaCaze, Adam. 2011. The role of basic-science in evidence-based medicine. Biology and Philosophy 26(1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Kirstin Borgerson for discussion and feedback on an earlier draft of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Bluhm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bluhm, R. Jeremy Howick: The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Theor Med Bioeth 32, 423–427 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-011-9196-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-011-9196-7

Navigation