Advertisement

Metallurgist

, Volume 61, Issue 5–6, pp 444–447 | Cite as

Energy Criteria for Selecting a Sulfide Concentrate Melting Method in Copper Production

  • G. V. Skopov
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Comparative analysis is provided for contemporary pyrometallurgical copper smelting processes used most extensively in world practice (Flash Smelting Outokumpu, Top Submerged Lance Technology (TSL) – Isasmelt and Ausmelt, El Teniente Converter, Mitsubishi Continuous Smelting, smelting in a Vanyukov furnace, Flash Smelting + Flash Converting) with ageing methods (reverberatory and shaft melting). Results are provided for calculating the energy expended for these processes. The most energy economic and ecologically secure technologies for copper smelting are revealed.

Keywords

energy pyrometallurgy melting copper 

References

  1. 1.
    V. L. Kubasov and A. V. Grechko, “Energy consumed in copper production from sulfi de ore and ways for reduction,” Tsvet. Met., No. 1, 7–11 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Mori and P. Paschen, “Energieverbrauch in der Kupfermetallurgie: Teil I: Pyrometallurgie (klassisch); Teil II: Direktreduktionsvervahren; Teil III: Hydrometallurgie,” Berg- und Hüttenmann. Monatsh, 136, No. 1, 18–23; No. 3,99–104; No. 5, 180–183 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kennecott Utah Copper Smelter Modernization: Proc. 8th Int. Flash Smelting Сongr., USA, Oct. 13–18, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ural Federal UniversityEkaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations