Skip to main content
Log in

Tunable shear stiffness in a metamaterial sheet

  • Mechanics of Extreme Materials
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a metamaterial sheet constituted by a periodic pattern of square tensegrity cells (T-bar) subjected to a uniform equibiaxial pressure is studied. In particular, a minimal mass lattice is analytical determined by imposing stability and material failure conditions. Interestingly, the shear stiffness of this optimized lattice is very small in comparison to the other moduli and exhibits a linear dependence on the applied load. This behavior suggests the interesting possibility of tailoring new materials with force tunable shear modulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here we are considering the half cables associated to a single cell.

  2. The double index notation indicates the symmetric (s) and antisymmetric (a) character (see Fig. 3) of the generalized displacements, with the first index referring to the horizontal axis and the second index to the vertical axis. In particular, \(u_1\) and \(u_2\) are s–s variables, whereas \(u_3\) is an a–a variable. \(u_4\) and \(u_5\) are s–a variables, whereas \(u_6\) and \(u_7\) are a–s variables.

References

  1. Amendola A, Krushynska A, Daraio C, Pugno N, Fraternali F (2018) Tuning frequency band gaps of tensegrity metamaterials with local and global prestress. Int J Solids Struct 155:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen H, Chan C, Sheng P (2010) Transformation optics and metamaterials. Nat Mater 9:387–396

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. DeTommasi D, Maddalena F, Puglisi G, Trentadue F (2017) Fractality in selfsimilar minimal mass structures. J Mech Phys Solids 107:433–450

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. DeTommasi D, Marano G, Puglisi G, Trentadue F (2015) Optimal complexity and fractal limits of self-similar tensegrities. Proc R Soc A 471:20150,250

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. DeTommasi D, Marano G, Puglisi G, Trentadue F (2017) Morphological optimization of tensegrity-type metamaterials. Compos Part B Eng 115:182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeTommasi D, Puglisi G, Trentadue F (2019) Elastic moduli of optimal tensegrity-type metamaterials. Front Mater 6:1041–1048

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fang N, Xi D, Xu J, Ambati M, Srituravanich W, Sun C, Zhang X (2006) Ultrasonic metamaterials with negative modulus. Nat Mater 5:452–456

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraternali F, Carpentieri G, Amendola A, Skelton R, Nesterenko V (2014) Multiscale tunability of solitary wave dynamics in tensegrity metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 105(20):201903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraternali F, Senatore L, Daraio C (2012) Solitary waves on tensegrity lattices. J Mech Phys Solids 60:1137–1144

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson R, Fleck N (2006) The structural performance of the periodic truss. J Mech Phys Solids 54:756–782

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingber D, Stamenovic D (2014) Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. J Rep Prog Phys 77:046603

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Krushynska A, Bosia F, Miniaci M, Pugno N (2017) Spider web-structured labyrinthine acoustic metamaterials for low-frequency sound control. New J Phys 19:105001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Motro R (2003) Tensegrity. Kogan Page Science, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliveira MD, Skelton R (2009) Tensegrity systems. Springer, New York, pp 1–216

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Paulose J, Meeussen A, Vitelli V (2015) Selective buckling via states of self-stress in topological metamaterials. PNAS 112:7639–7644

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabouni-Zawadzka A, Gilewski W (2019) Soft and stiff simplex tensegrity lattices as extreme smart metamaterials. Materials 12(1):187

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schittny R, Buckmann T, Kadic M, Wegener M (2013) Elastic measurements on macroscopic three-dimensional pentamode metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 30(103):11,905

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

D. De Tommasi and G. Puglisi have been supported by the Italian Ministry MIUR-PRIN project COAN 5.50.16.01, code 2015JW9NJT. G. Puglisi has been supported by the MIUR-PRIN project 2017KL4EF3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Trentadue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Here we give the explicit form of the relation

$$\beta = \bar{\beta }+ N_{[1]}.$$
(40)

In view of (18), (19) and (20) the incremental compressive axial force \(N_{[1]}\) associated to the biaxial compression force \(fl=1\) can be determined as

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} N_{[1]}=\dfrac{4 k_e}{k_{ss1}}=\dfrac{k_e}{k_e +2 k_{ec}}=\dfrac{1}{\dfrac{\alpha (\beta -1) \sqrt{f}}{\xi \epsilon _y \sqrt{\beta l}}+1}. \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(41)

It is should be noted that Eq. (40), based on the superposition principle, can be applied to the present non-linear problem since no geometrical stiffness terms are present in (41). By using (21) and (22), we further find

$$N_{[1]}=\dfrac{\beta \lambda }{\alpha (\beta -1) + \beta \lambda }.$$
(42)

Now, for sake of simplicity, we consider that in all the numerical examples here presented we always have \((\beta -1)< 0.004\). Thus we limit our analysis to the case \((\beta -1)\ll 1\) for which we have

$$N_{[1]}=1-\dfrac{\alpha (\beta -1)}{\lambda }+O\left( (\beta -1)^2\right).$$
(43)

Then (40) can be written as

$$\bar{\beta }= \left( \beta -1\right) +\dfrac{\alpha (\beta -1)}{\lambda }+O\left( (\beta -1)^2\right)$$
(44)

Finally, we find the allowable range for the parameter \(\alpha\). This is determined by the condition

$$\bar{\beta }\le \alpha (\beta -1)$$
(45)

that, in view of (44), leads to

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \lambda >&{}1\\ \alpha \ge &{} \dfrac{\lambda }{\lambda -1}. \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}$$
(46)

Appendix 2

In Fig. 7 we plot the optimal length \(l_0\) for different values of the load f and limit strain \(\varepsilon _y\). In the figure, by considering a steel based metamaterial, we assume \(E=207\) GPa. Moreover we consider a prestress parameter \(\beta =1.02\) and circular sections, so that \(\xi ^2=4/\pi\).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Optimal truss dimension

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Tommasi, D., Puglisi, G. & Trentadue, F. Tunable shear stiffness in a metamaterial sheet. Meccanica 54, 2029–2037 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-00994-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-00994-5

Keywords

Navigation