Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical thermodynamics for metaequilibrium or metastable states

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show how statistical thermodynamics can be formulated in situations of metaequilibrium or metastability (as in the cases of supercooled liquids or of glasses respectively). By analogy with phenomenological thermodynamics, the primary quantities considered are the heat Q absorbed and the work W performed by the system of interest. These are defined through the energy exchanges which occur when the system is put in contact with a thermostat and with a barostat, the whole system being dealt with as a global Hamiltonian dynamical system. The coefficients of the fundamental form \(\delta Q-\delta W\) turn out to have such expressions that the closure of the form is manifest: this gives the first principle. A further step is performed by making use of time reversibility. This provides new expressions for the coefficients, such that the second principle in the form of Clausius is also manifest. Such coefficients are expressed in terms of time-autocorrelations of suitable dynamical variables, in a way analogous to that of fluctuation dissipation theory for equilibrium states. All these results are independent of the ergodicity properties of the global dynamical system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In equilibrium statistical mechanics, instead, U is a state function just by assumption, being defined as the canonical mean of the Hamiltonian of the system of interest, and \(\delta Q\) is then defined consequently, as \(\delta Q ={\mathrm {d}}U + \delta W\), with a previous natural definition of \(\delta W\).

  2. Obviously one may think of more realistic models in which each of the two systems separately exchanges heat with the wall. But the example given here may suffice to show that exhanges of energy with no work performed, can be modelel in microscopic terms.

  3. As usual it is understood that, for large systems, the interaction Hamiltonian, although playing an essential dynamical role in allowing for energy exchanges between the two subsystems, can nevertheless be neglected in the computations of mean values of the quantities of interest (such as the energy of a subsystem) with respect to a given probability measure. Indeed such quantities are proportional to the volume of the system of interest, whereas the interaction terms are proportional to the area of the basis of the cylinder.

  4. Equivalence of the two procedures is immediately checked. Indeed, writing mean values in terms of a probability density \(\rho\), for the mean value \(\langle F\rangle\) of F at time t one has with the first procedure

    $$\langle F\rangle =\int F(z) \rho (t,z) {\mathrm {d}}z,$$

    where \(\rho\) evolves according to the Liouville theorem, i.e., with \(\rho (t,z)=\rho (0, \varPhi ^{-t}z)\). On the other hand the Jacobian determinant of \(z'=\varPhi ^{-t}z\) has value 1, so that, by changing variables (and calling again z the new variable \(z'\)) one has the dual form

    $$\langle F\rangle =\int F(\varPhi ^t z) \rho (0,z) {\mathrm {d}}z\equiv \int F_t(z) \rho (0,z) {\mathrm {d}}z.$$
  5. We are assuming that neglecting the interaction term in the measure introduces only very small errors in computing the mean values of the quantities of interest.

  6. A larger number of internal parameters may be required in more general cases, as for example in the case of a nonhomogeneous fluid.

  7. In order to neglect the interaction Hamiltonian in computing averages one requires to assume not only (as usual) that the system is large, but also that motions are considered in which the piston moves very slowly.

  8. This is the reason why relations (33) hold if one considers \(\varDelta F\) and not just F.

  9. The positiveness of the heat capacity was proven above, making use of the assumption that the marginal measure for the environment be of Gibbs type. However, if one looks at the proof one realizes that the result also holds if any assumption is made which guarantees that the partial derivatives of the density \(\rho\) have negative definite sign. For example, a sufficient condition is that, in formula (31) for the density, instead of the exponential \(\exp ( -\beta H)\) there appears a factor \(f(\beta H)\), with any function f having the property \(f'\le 0\).

References

  1. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1958) Statistical physics. Pergamon Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tisza L (1966) Generalized thermodynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen JK, Dyre JC (1996) Fluctuation-dissipation theorem for frequency-dependent specific heat. Phys Rev B 54:15754

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haida O, Matsuo T, Suga H, Seki S (1972) Relaxational proton ordering crystalline state in hexagonal and glassy ice. Proc Jpn Acad 48:489

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herzfeld KL, Litovitz TA (1959) Absorption and dispersion of ultrasonic waves. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birge NO (1986) Specific-heat spectroscopy of glycerol and propylene glycol near the glass transition. Phys Rev B 34:1631

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Birge NO, Nagel SR (1985) Specific-heat spectroscopy of the glass transition. Phys Rev Lett 54:2674

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carati A, Maiocchi AM (2012) Exponentially long stability times for a nonlinear lattice in the thermodynamical limit. Commun Math Phys 314:129

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. De Roeck W, Huveneers F (2015) Asymptotic localization of energy in nondisordered oscillator chains. Commun Pure Appl Math 68:1532

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Carati A, Galgani L, Pozzi B (2003) Levy flights in Landau–Teller model of molecular collision. Phys Rev Lett 90:010601

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carati A, Galgani L, Giorgilli A, Paleari S (2007) FPU phenomenon for generic initial data. Phys Rev E 76:022104

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Nernst W (1911) Der energieinhalt fester stoffe. Ann Phys 341:395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gunther P (1917) Untersuchungen über die spezifische Wärme bei tiefen temperaturen. Ann Phys 356:828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olla S (2014) Microscopic derivation of an isothermal thermodynamic transformation. In: Bernardin C, Gonçalves P (eds) From particle systems to partial differential equations. Proceedings in mathematics and statistics, vol 75. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–238

  15. Fermi E (1956) Thermodynamics. Dover, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Khinchin AJ (1949) Mathematical foundations of statistical mechanics. Dover, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chernov NI, Lebowitz JL, Sinai YaG (2002) Dynamics of a massive piston in an ideal gas. Uspekhi Mat Nauk 57(6):3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zubarev DN (1974) Nonequilibrium statistical thermodynamics. Consultants Bureau, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khantuleva TA, Mescheryakov YI (1999) Nonlocal theory of the high-strain-rate processes in a structured media. Int J Solids Struct 36:3105

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruelle D (1980) Measures describing a turbulent flow. Ann N Y Acad Sci 357:1

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallavotti G, Cohen EGD (1995) Dynamical ensembles in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. Phys Rev Lett 74:2694

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans DJ, Morriss GP (1990) Statistical mechanics of liquids. Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lucia U (2008) Probability, ergodicity, irreversibility and dynamical systems. Proc R Soc 464:1089

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Galgani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carati, A., Maiocchi, A. & Galgani, L. Statistical thermodynamics for metaequilibrium or metastable states. Meccanica 52, 1295–1307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0490-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0490-3

Keywords

Navigation