Skip to main content
Log in

The lightest pressure vessel

  • Brief Notes and Discussions
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The considered membrane shell is held together against the gas pressure due to tensile forces within the walls. The optimization problems consist in search of the shape and the thickness distribution of membrane shells. The shape of the shell and the thickness are unknowns. The exact closed form solution for the optimal shape is obtained and corresponding isoperimetric inequality is stated for a reasonably broad type of stress criteria. From the viewpoint of the demonstrated isoperimetric inequality the non-sphericity of the optimal pressure vessels reported in the articles (Banichuk in Mech Dokl Phys 50(11):605–609, 2005. doi:10.1134/1.2137798; Banichuk et al. in Meccanica 40(2):135–145, 2005; Struct Multidiscipl Optim 35:453–459, 2008. doi:10.1007/s00158-007-0149-8; Timonin in Mech Solids MTT 3:183–185, 1984) is explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altenbach H, Bolchoun A, Kolupaev VA (2013) Phenomenological yield and failure criteria. In: Altenbach H, Öchsner A (eds) Plasticity of pressure-sensitive materials, Serie ASM. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 49–152

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altenbach H, Kolupaev V (2015) Classical and non-classical failure criteria. In: Altenbach H, Sadowski T (eds) Failure and damage analysis of advanced materials, CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, 560. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashby MF (2011) Materials selection in mechanical design, 4th edn. Elsevier Ltd, AMSTERDAM

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banichuk NV (2005) Shape optimization for membrane shells of revolution. Mech Dokl Phys 50(11):605–609. doi:10.1134/1.2137798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banichuk NV, Barthold FJ, Serra M (2005) Optimization of axisymmetric membrane shells against brittle fracture. Meccanica 40(2):135–145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Banichuk NV, Ragnedda F, Serra M (2008) Optimization of mass effectiveness of axisymmetric pressure vessels. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 35:453–459. doi:10.1007/s00158-007-0149-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dow M, Nakamura H, Rozvany GIN (1982) Optimal cupolas of uniform strength: spherical M-shells and axisymmetric T-shells. Ingenieur-Archiv 52:335–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Issler W (1964) Membranschalen gleicher Festigkeit. Ingenieur-Archiv XXXIII:330–345

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Prager W, Rozvany GIN (1980) Optimal spherical cupola of uniform strength. Ingenieur-Archiv 49:287–293

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Save M, Prager W (1985) Structural optimization, optimality criteria, vol 1. PLENUM PRESS, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Timonin AM (1984) On the shape of membrane equal-strength shell of minimum mass. Mech Solids MTT 3:183–185

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu M-H (2004) Unified strength theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Kobelev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobelev, V. The lightest pressure vessel. Meccanica 52, 483–486 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0415-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0415-1

Keywords

Navigation