Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions of propagating waves in a one-dimensional chain of linear oscillators with a strongly nonlinear local attachment

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the interaction of propagating wavetrains in a one-dimensional chain of coupled linear damped oscillators with a strongly nonlinear, lightweight, dissipative local attachment which acts, in essence, as nonlinear energy sink—NES. Both symmetric and highly un-symmetric NES configurations are considered, labelled S-NES and U-NES, respectively, with strong (in fact, non-linearizable or nearly non-linearizable) stiffness nonlinearity. Especially for the case of U-NES we show that it is capable of effectively arresting incoming slowly modulated pulses with a single fast frequency by scattering the energy of the pulse to a range of frequencies, by locally dissipating a major portion of the incoming energy, and then by backscattering residual waves upstream. As a result, the wave transmission past the location of the NES is minimized, and the NES acts, in effect, as passive wave arrestor and reflector. Analytical reduced-order modeling of the dynamics is performed through complexification/averaging. In addition, governing nonlinear dynamics is studied computationally and compared to the analytical predictions. Results from the reduced order model recover the exact computational simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vakakis AF, Gendelman OV, Kerschen G et al (2008) Nonlinear targeted energy transfer in mechanical and structural systems, I and II. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kovaleva Manevitch LI, Manevitch E (2010) Intense energy transfer and superharmonic resonance in a system of two coupled oscillators. Phys Rev E 81:056215

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee YS, Kerschen G, Vakakis AF et al (2005) Complicated dynamics of a linear oscillator with a light, essentially nonlinear attachment. Phys D 204(1–2):41–69

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatti G, Brennan MJ, Kovacic I (2010) On the interaction of the responses at the resonance frequencies of a nonlinear two degrees-of-freedom system. Phys D 239:591–599

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Vakakis AF (2003) Designing a linear structure with a local nonlinear attachment for enhanced energy pumping. Meccanica 38(6):677–686

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kovaleva A, Manevitch LI, Manevitch E (2010) Intense energy transfer and superharmonic resonance in a system of two coupled oscillators. Phys Rev E 81:056215

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. McFarland DM, Bergman LA, Vakakis AF (2005) Experimental study of nonlinear energy pumping occurring at a single fast frequency. Int J Non-linear Mech 40:891–899

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. McFarland DM, Kerschen G, Kowtko J et al (2005) Experimental investigation of targeted energy transfers in strongly and nonlinearly coupled oscillators. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):791–799

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gourdon E, Alexander NA, Taylor CA et al (2007) Nonlinear energy pumping under transient forcing with strongly nonlinear coupling: theoretical and experimental results. J Sound Vib 300:522–551

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manevitch LI (2012) Energy exchange, localization and transfer in nanoscale systems (weak coupling approximation). Russ J Phys Chem B 6(4):563–581

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Manevitch LI, Kovaleva A (2013) Nonlinear energy transfer in classical and quantum systems. Phys Rev E 87:022904

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gendelman OV, Gourdon E, Lamarque CH (2006) Quasiperiodic energy pumping in coupled oscillators under periodic forcing. J Sound Vib 294:651–662

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasan MA, Starosvetsky Y, Vakakis AF, Manevitch LI (2013) Nonlinear targeted energy transfer and macroscopic analogue of the quantum Landau–Zener effect in coupled granular chains. Phys D 252:46–58

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnold VI (1988) Dynamical systems III, encyclopaedia of mathematical sciences, vol 3. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Tumkur RKR (2013) Modal interactions and targeted energy transfers in laminar vortex-induced vibrations of a rigid cylinder with strongly nonlinear internal attachments, PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign

  16. Gendelman OV, Vakakis AF, Bergman LA, McFarland DM (2010) Asymptotic analysis of passive suppression mechanisms for aeroelastic instabilities in a rigid wing in subsonic flow. SIAM J Appl Math 70:1655–1677

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamarque CH, Savadkoohi AT (2014) Dynamical behavior of a Bouc–Wen type oscillator coupled to a nonlinear energy sink. Meccanica. doi:10.1007/s11012-014-9913-1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao J, Cochelin B (2014) Theoretical and numerical study of targeted energy transfer inside an acoustic cavity by a non-linear membrane absorber. Int J Nonlinear Mech. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.04.008i

  19. Vakakis AF, Manevitch LI, Musienko A et al (2004) Transient dynamics of a dispersive elastic wave guide weakly coupled to an essentially nonlinear end attachment. Wave Motion 41(2):109–132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Imaikin V, Komech A, Vainberg B (2006) On scattering of solitons for the Klein–Gordon equation coupled to a particle. Comm Math Phys 268:321–367

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Komech AI, Komech AA (2006) On the global attraction to solitary waves for the Klein–Gordon equation coupled to a nonlinear oscillator. C R Acad Sci Paris Ser I 343:111–114

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Komech AI, Komech AA (2006) Global well-posedness for the Schrödinger equation coupled to a nonlinear oscillator. Max-Planck Institute Leipzig, Leipzig 85

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cuevas J, Palmero F, Archilla JFR, Romero FR (2002) Moving discrete breathers in a Klein–Gordon chain with an impurity. J Phys A 35:10519–10530

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Maniadis P, Kopidakis F, Aubry S (2004) Classical and quantum targeted energy transfer between nonlinear oscillators. Phys D 188:153–177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Fei Z, Kivshar YS, Vázquez L (1992) Resonant kink-impurity interactions in the ϕ4 model. Phys Rev A 46(8):5214–5220

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Forinash K, Peyrard M, Malomed B (1994) Interaction of discrete breathers with impurity modes. Phys Rev E 49(4):3400–3411

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goodman RH, Holmes PJ, Weinstein MI (2004) Strong NLS soliton-defect interactions. Phys D 192:215–248

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodman RH, Holmes PJ, Weinstein MI (2002) Interaction of sine-Gordon kinks with defects: phase space transport in a two-mode model. Phys D 161:21–44

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Daraio C, Nesterenko VF, Herbold EB, Jin S (2006) Energy trapping and shock disintegration in a composite granular medium. Phys Rev Lett 96:058002

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kevrekidis PG, Vainchtein A, Serra Garcia M, Daraio C (2013) Interaction of traveling waves with mass-in-mass defects within a Hertzian chain. Phys Rev E 87:042911

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vakakis AF (2010) Relaxation oscillations, subharmonic orbits and chaos in the dynamics of a linear lattice with a local essentially nonlinear attachment. Nonlinear Dyn 61:443–463

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Rothos VM, Vakakis AF (2009) Dynamic interactions of traveling waves propagating in a linear chain with a local essentially nonlinear attachment. Wave Motion 46:174–188

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. AL-Shudeifat MA, Wierschem N, Quinn DD et al (2013) Numerical and experimental investigation of a highly effective single-sided vibro-impact nonlinear energy sink for shock mitigation. Int J Nonlinear Mech 52:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Carrella A, Brennan MJ, Waters TP (2007) Static analysis of a passive vibration isolator with quasi-zero-stiffness characteristic. J Sound Vib 301(3):678–689

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kovacic I, Brennan MJ, Waters TP (2008) A study of a nonlinear vibration isolator with a quasi-zero stiffness characteristic. J Sound Vib 315(3):700–711

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gatti G, Kovacic I, Brennan MJ (2010) On the response of a harmonically excited two degree-of-freedom system consisting of a linear and a nonlinear quasi-zero stiffness oscillator. J Sound Vib 329(10):1823–1835

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Manevitch LI (2001) Description of localized normal modes in the chain of nonlinear coupled oscillators using complex variables. Nonlinear Dyn 25(1–3):95–109

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Manevitch LI (1999) Complex representation of dynamics of coupled oscillators. In: Uvarova LA, Arinstein AE, Latyshev A (eds) Mathematical models of nonlinear excitations, transfer dynamics and control in condensed systems. Kluwer Academic, New york

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gendelman OV (2001) Transition of energy to a nonlinear localized mode in a highly un-symmetric system of two oscillators. Nonlinear Dyn 25:237–253

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Byrd PB, Friedman MD (1971) Handbook of elliptic integrals for scientists and engineers. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the (anonymous) reviewers for their constructive comments that helped the improvement of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad A. AL-Shudeifat.

Appendix

Appendix

The kernels appearing in (4) are defined in terms of the previously identified normalized variables as follows,

$$G_{m} \left( \tau \right) = \frac{1}{\varOmega }e^{{ - \frac{\varepsilon \varLambda \tau }{{2\left( {1 + \varepsilon } \right)}}}} \quad\,\int\limits_{0}^{\tau } {J_{0} \left[ {\left( {\alpha^{2} - \frac{{\varepsilon^{2} \varLambda^{2} }}{{4\left( {1 + \varepsilon } \right)^{2} }}} \right)^{1/2} \left( {\tau^{2} - v^{2} } \right)^{1/2} } \right]J_{2m}\quad \left( {\frac{{2D^{1/2} }}{\varOmega }v} \right)dv \, } \quad \alpha = \frac{{\omega_{1} }}{\varOmega }, \quad \frac{D}{{\varOmega^{2} }} = \frac{1 + \varepsilon }{2} - \frac{{\alpha^{2} }}{2} = \frac{{1 - \alpha^{2} }}{2} + O\left( \varepsilon \right) $$
(9)

where \( J_{k} ( \bullet ) \) is the Bessel function of the first kind and of the mth order, and \( G_{ - m} \left( \tau \right) = G_{m} \left( \tau \right),\,\,\,m = 1,\;2, \ldots \).

To derive this expression we consider the reduced set of equations (5) and note that correct to \( O\left( \varepsilon \right) \) the first equation governing the motion of the center of mass of the NES and the 0th particle of the chain is a linear non-homogeneous ordinary differential equation which can be explicitly solved to yield:

$$ v\left( \tau \right) = \frac{{DF_{p} }}{{\varOmega^{2} }}\int\limits_{0}^{\tau } {\left[ {G_{1 - p} (\xi ) + G_{1 + p} (\xi )} \right]\sin \left( {\tau - \xi } \right)d\xi } + O\left( \varepsilon \right) $$
(10)

This approximation when substituted into to the second of Eq. (5) governing the relative oscillation between the NES and the 0th particle yields a single nonlinear integro-differential equation that replaces the infinite set of Eq. (2) correct to \( O\left( \varepsilon \right) \):

$$ w^{\prime\prime} + \varLambda w^{\prime} - \frac{(1 + \varepsilon )}{{\varOmega^{2} }}\frac{{f_{NES} ( - \varepsilon^{1/2} w)}}{{\varepsilon^{3/2} }} = \frac{{d^{2} }}{{d\tau^{2} }}\left\{ {\frac{{DF_{p} }}{{\varOmega^{2} }}\int\limits_{0}^{\tau } {\left[ {G_{1 - p} (\xi ) + G_{1 + p} (\xi )} \right]\sin \left( {\tau - \xi } \right)d\xi } } \right\} + O\left( \varepsilon \right) w(0 + ) = w^{\prime}(0 + ) = 0$$
(11)

We will refer to (11) as the ‘reduced system.’ It is clear that in its present form (11) cannot be analytically treated for general ranges of the system parameters. However, we will show that this restriction can be alleviated under the assumption of weak coupling between adjacent particles in the chain. To this end, we need to rescale the coefficients of the linear coupling stiffnesses in the chain according to \( D \to \varepsilon^{1/2} D \). From the physical point of view, in the limit of weak coupling between particles the impulsive response of the chain takes the form of a slowly modulated wavetrain with a single ‘fast’ normalized frequency equal to unity (which in physical units corresponds to the grounding frequency \( \omega_{1} \) of each oscillator of the chain). The time scale of the slow modulation is directly related to the weak coupling in the chain. In turn, this enables a slow-fast partition of the governing dynamics, as well as averaging with respect to the single fast frequency; the resulting slow modulation equations fully capture the leading-order scattering of propagating waves with the NES, and provides us with a methodology for analytically studying (to first order) the effectiveness of the NES as passive wave arrestor. Later in our analysis we will relax the assumption of weak coupling in the chain in order to study the performance of the NES for the case of strong coupling. In that case, however, our study will be entirely numerical, as it won’t be amenable to slow-fast partition of the dynamics and analytical treatment.

For the case of weak coupling, the response \( v\left( \tau \right) \) (cf. expression (10)) is of \( O(\varepsilon^{1/2} ) \). Considering the mathematical structure of \( G_{m} (\xi ),\,\,m = 1 \pm p \) in (10), and taking into account integral expressions for the Bessel functions of the first kind [40] we obtain the following alternative integral representation,

$$ G_{m} \left( \tau \right) = \frac{1}{\pi \,\varOmega }e^{{ - \frac{\varepsilon \varLambda \tau }{{2\left( {1 + \varepsilon } \right)}}}} \,\int\limits_{0}^{\pi } {\,\frac{{\cos \left( {m\theta } \right)}}{\omega \left( \theta \right)}} \sin \left[ {\omega \left( \theta \right)\tau } \right]\,\,d\theta $$
(12)

where, for weak coupling between particles of the chain, the frequency \( \omega \left( \theta \right) \) is defined by:

$$ \omega \left( \theta \right) = \frac{1}{\varOmega }\left[ {\omega_{1}^{2} + 4\varepsilon^{1/2} D\left( {\sin \frac{\theta }{2}} \right)^{2} } \right]^{1/2} $$
(13)

Expanding \( \omega \left( \theta \right) \) and \( \varOmega^{ - 1} \) in terms of the small parameter \( \varepsilon \) yields the following asymptotic approximations,

$$1 - \omega^{2} \left( \theta \right) = \frac{{2\varepsilon^{1/2} D}}{{\omega_{1}^{2} }}\cos \theta - \varepsilon \left( {1 + \frac{{4D^{2} }}{{\omega_{1}^{4} }}\cos \theta } \right) + O\left( {\varepsilon^{3/2} } \right) \frac{1}{\varOmega } = \frac{1}{{\omega_{1} }} - \frac{{\varepsilon^{1/2} D}}{{\omega_{1}^{3} }} + O\left( \varepsilon \right) $$
(14)

which, when substituted into (12) yields the following asymptotic approximation for \( G_{m} \left( \tau \right) \):

$$G_{m} \left( \tau \right) = \underbrace {{L_{m} (\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau )}}_{Slow\,part}\underbrace {{{}_{{}}e^{j\tau }_{{}} }}_{Fast\,\,part} +\,cc, L_{m} (\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau ) \equiv \frac{1}{2j}\left[ {\frac{1}{{\pi \omega_{1} }} - \frac{{\varepsilon^{1/2} D}}{{\pi \omega_{1}^{3} }} + O(\varepsilon )} \right]\,\,e^{{ - \frac{\varepsilon \varLambda \tau }{{2\left( {1 + \varepsilon } \right)}}}} \,\,\int\limits_{0}^{\pi } {\,\left\{ {\left[ { - \frac{{\varepsilon^{1/2} D}}{{\pi \omega_{1}^{3} }}\cos \theta + O(\varepsilon )} \right]\cos \theta \,e^{{j\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau \left[ { - \frac{D}{{\pi \omega_{1}^{3} }}\cos \theta + O(\varepsilon )} \right]}} } \right\}} \,d\theta $$
(15)

Hence, in the limit of weak coupling between particles of the chain the kernels \( G_{m} \left( \tau \right) \)can be expressed in terms of a fast oscillation with unit normalized frequency modulated by the slow (complex) modulation \( L_{m} (\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau ) \), with \( (cc) \) denoting complex conjugate.

Considering now the right hand side of Eq. (11) and substituting (15), in the limit of small coupling between particles we express it as,

$$ \frac{{d^{2} }}{{d\tau^{2} }}\left\{ {\frac{{\varepsilon^{1/2} DF_{p} }}{{\varOmega^{2} }}\int\limits_{0}^{\tau } {\left[ {G_{1 - p} (\xi ) + G_{1 + p} (\xi )} \right]\sin \left( {\tau - \xi } \right)d\xi } } \right\} + O\left( \varepsilon \right) = \frac{{d^{2} }}{{d\tau^{2} }}\left\{ {\frac{{\varepsilon^{1/2} DF_{p} }}{{\pi \,\varOmega^{3} }}\,\,\int\limits_{0}^{\pi } {\,\frac{{\left[ {\cos (p - 1)\theta + \cos (p + 1)\theta } \right]}}{{\omega (\theta )\,\left[ {1 - \omega^{2} (\theta )} \right]}}\,\,\left[ {\cos \omega (\theta )\tau - \omega (\theta )\sin \tau } \right]d\theta } } \right\} + O\left( \varepsilon \right) = \underbrace {{A_{p} (\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau )}}_{Slow\,part}\underbrace {{{}_{{}}e^{j\tau }_{{}} }}_{Fast\,\,part} +\,cc $$
(16)

where the slowly varying complex modulation \( A_{m} (\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau ) \) is expressed asymptotically as:

$$ A_{p} (\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau ) = \frac{{jF_{p} }}{{2\omega_{1} }}\,e^{ - jp\pi /2} \,J_{p} \left( {\frac{{D\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau }}{{\omega_{1}^{2} }}} \right) + O(\varepsilon^{1/2} ),\,\,\,\,p \le - 2 $$
(17)

Note the asymptotic expression (17) correctly confirms that \( A_{p} (0 + ) = 0 \), i.e., it is consistent with the initial conditions of the problem.

Substituting (16) and (17) into the reduced system (11) brings it in the following asymptotic form:

$$ w^{\prime\prime} + \varLambda w^{\prime} - \frac{(1 + \varepsilon )}{{\varOmega^{2} }}\frac{{f_{NES} ( - \varepsilon^{1/2} w)}}{{\varepsilon^{3/2} }} = \frac{{jF_{p} }}{{2\omega_{1} }}\,e^{ - jp\pi /2} \,J_{p} \left( {\frac{{D\varepsilon^{1/2} \tau }}{{\omega_{1}^{2} }}} \right)\,\,e^{j\tau } + cc + O\left( {\varepsilon^{1/2} } \right) w(0 + ) = w^{\prime}(0 + ) = 0 $$
(18)

This equation models the leading-order nonlinear dynamic interaction between modulated waves propagating in the impulsively excited chain and the NES attached at the 0th particle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vakakis, A.F., AL-Shudeifat, M.A. & Hasan, M.A. Interactions of propagating waves in a one-dimensional chain of linear oscillators with a strongly nonlinear local attachment. Meccanica 49, 2375–2397 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-0008-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-0008-9

Keywords

Navigation