Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of metals in Alzheimer’s disease

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Metabolic Brain Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal homeostasis in the central nervous system (CNS) is a crucial component of healthy brain function, because metals serve as enzymatic cofactors and are key components of intra- and inter-neuronal signaling. Metal dysregulation wreaks havoc on neural networks via induction and proliferation of pathological pathways that cause oxidative stress, synaptic impairment, and ultimately, cognitive deficits. Thus, exploration of metal biology in relation to neurodegenerative pathology is essential in pursuing novel therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. This review covers mechanisms of action of aluminum, iron, copper, and zinc ions with respect to the progressive, toxic accumulation of extracellular β-amyloid plaques and intracellular hyperphosphorylated neurofibrillary tau tangles that characterizes Alzheimer’s Disease, with the goal of evaluating the therapeutic potential of metal ion interference in neurodegenerative disease prevention and treatment. As neuroscientific interest in the role of metals in neurodegeneration escalates—in large part due to emerging evidence substantiating the interplay between metal imbalances and neuropathology—it becomes clear that the use of metal chelating agents may be a viable method for ameliorating Alzheimer’s Disease pathology, as its etiology remains obscure. We conclude that, although metal therapies can potentially deter neurodegenerative processes, the most promising treatments will remain elusive until further understanding of neurodegenerative etiology is achieved. New research directions may best be guided by animal models of neurodegeneration, which reveal specific insights into biological mechanisms underlying dementia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Scheme 1
Scheme 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Datasets from this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from the National Center for Toxicological Research/FDA [Protocol #763101 to SS]

Funding

This study was supported by funding from the National Center for Toxicological Research/FDA [Protocol #763101 to SS].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Nikita Das (ND) is the lead author who has substantially contributed in writing the manuscript. James Raymick (JR) has significant input on histological labeling of sections, data collection. Sumit Sarkar (SS) is the corresponding author and primary input on experiment design, performed animal sacrifice, tissue processing and immune-labeling of histological sections, data collection and interpretation of photomicrographs and editing of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Sarkar.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All experimental procedures described here for rodent and human tissues were approved by the appropriate committees at the National Center for Toxicological Research/FDA, including the NCTR Office of Research, the Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management Director and the FDA Research Involving Human Subjects Committee (RIHSC). As determined by the FDA RIHSC, this study did not reach the definition of “Human Subject Research” at 45 CFR 46.102(f) and thus, 45 CFR Part 46 does not apply.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors in this manuscript has any conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect those of the Food and Drug Administration.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, N., Raymick, J. & Sarkar, S. Role of metals in Alzheimer’s disease. Metab Brain Dis 36, 1627–1639 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00765-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00765-w

Keywords

Navigation