Skip to main content
Log in

On Two-Stage Comparisons with a Control Under Heteroscedastic Normal Distributions

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New two-stage sampling methodologies are developed for both one-sided and two-sided comparisons between the means from treatment groups and a control. We suppose that we have k i ( ≥ 1) independent treatments with associated response variables \(X_{i1},...,X_{ik_{i}},\) i = 1,...,r( ≥ 2). We let X ijl denote the lth observation recorded independently and assume that their common distribution is \(N(\mu _{ij},\sigma _{i}^{2}),l=1,...,n_{i}(\geq 2),j=1,...,k_{i},i=1,...,r.\) Also, let X 0l denote the lth observation recorded independently from a control and we assume that their common distribution is \(N(\mu _{0},\sigma _{0}^{2}),l=1,...,n_{0}(\geq 2).\) The parameters μ ij ’s, σ i ’s, μ 0, and σ 0 are assumed finite, unknown, and σ i ’s unequal, j = 1,...,k i , i = 1,...,r. Denote the treatment-control difference Δ ij  = μ ij  − μ 0 and our goal is to make simultaneous one-sided and two-sided fixed-precision confidence statements regarding all Δ ij ’s, j = 1,...,k i , i = 1,...,r. Specifically, given two preassigned numbers d( > 0) and 0 < α < 1, we develop two sets of appropriate two-stage stopping variables N 0,N 1,...,N r via procedures \(\mathcal{P}_{\text{I}}^{ \mathbf{N}}\) and \(\mathcal{P}_{\text{II}}^{\mathbf{N}}\) respectively such that the simultaneous probability that \((\overline{X}_{ijN_{i}}-\overline{X} _{0n_{0}})-\Delta _{ij}\leq d\) under \(\mathcal{P}_{\text{I}}^{\mathbf{N}}\) and that \(\left| (\overline{X}_{ijN_{i}}-\overline{X}_{0N_{0}})-\Delta _{ij}\right| \leq d\) under \(\mathcal{P}_{\text{II}}^{\mathbf{N}}\) would both exceed or equal 1 − α for all j = 1,...,k i , i = 1,...,r. We note that the two-stage methodology for our one-sided problem covers more diverse applications than Dudewicz et al.’s (Biom Z 17:13–26, 1975) methodology did since we no longer assume k 1 = ... = k r  = 1. With regard to our two-sided problem, no previous two-stage methodology was available in the literature. In this work, mathematical determinations of appropriate design constants with regard to either goal, the proposed methodologies, and the construction of the requisite tables are all new. This paper emphasizes practical implementations of the proposed methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoshima M (2005) Statistical inference in two-stage sampling. Selected papers on differential equations and analysis. Am Math Soc Transl 215:125–145

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aoshima M, Mukhopadhyay N (1998) Fixed-width simultaneous confidence intervals for multinormal means in several intraclass correlation models. J Multivar Anal 66:46–63

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aoshima M, Kushida T (2005) Asymptotic second-order efficiency for two-stage multiple comparisons with components of a linear function of mean vectors. In: Balakrishnan N, Kannan N, Nagaraja N (eds) Advances in ranking and selection, multiple comparisons, and reliability: methodology and applications. Birkhauser, Boston, pp 191–211

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aoshima M, Takada Y (2000) Second-order properties of a two-stage procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Jpn Stat Soc 30:27–41

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aoshima M, Yata K (2010) Asymptotic second-order consistency for two-stage estimation methodologies and its applications. Ann Inst Stat Math 62:571–600

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer RE, Dunnett CW, Sobel M (1954) A two-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with a common unknown variance. Biometrika 41:170–176

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer RE, Kiefer J, Sobel M (1968) Sequential identification and ranking procedures: with special reference to Koopman–Darmois populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer RE, Santner TJ, Goldsman DM (1995) Design and analysis of experiments for statistical selection, screening, and multiple comparisons. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen HJ, Dudewicz EJ, Lee YJ (1976) Subset selection procedures for normal means under unequal sample sizes. Sankhya, Ser B 38:249–255

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB (1940) On the non-existence of Student’s hypothesis having power functions independent of σ. Ann Math Stat 11:186–192

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz EJ (1971) Non-existence of a single-sample selection procedure whose P(CS) is independent of the variance. S Afr Stat J 5:37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz EJ (1980) Ranking (ordering) and selection: an overview of how to select the best. Technometrics 22:113–119

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz EJ, Dalal SR (1975) Allocation of observations in ranking and selection with unequal variances. Sankhya, Ser B 37:28–78

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz EJ, Ramberg JS, Chen HJ (1975) New tables for multiple comparisons with a control (unknown variances). Biom Z 17:13–26

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn OJ (1958) Estimation of the means of dependent variables. Ann Math Stat 29:1095–1111

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett CW, Sobel M (1955) Approximations to the probability integral and certain percentage points of a multivariate analogue of Student’s t-distribution. Biometrika 42:258–260

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh M, Mukhopadhyay N, Sen PK (1997) Sequential estimation. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons JD, Olkin I, Sobel M (1977) Selecting and ordering populations: a new statistical methodology. Wiley, New York. Reprinted 1999, SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SS, Panchapakesan S (1979) Multiple decision procedures: theory and methodology of selecting and ranking populations. Wiley, New York. Reprinted 2002, SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N (1979) Some comments on two-stage selection procedures. Commun Stat, Theory Methods 8:671–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N (1993) Nonlinear renewal theory and beyond: reviewing the roles in selection and ranking. In: Hoppe FM (ed) Multiple comparisons, selection, and applications in biometry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 293–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N (1995) Two-stage and multi-stage estimation. In: Balakrishnan N, Basu AP (eds) Exponential distribution: theory, methods and application, chapter 26. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, pp 429–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N (1999a) Second-order properties of a two-stage fixed-size confidence region for the mean vector of a multivariate normal distribution. J Multivar Anal 68:250–263

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N (1999b) Higher than second-order approximations via two-stage sampling. Sankhya, Ser A 61:254–269

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N (2005) A new approach to determine the pilot sample size in two-stage sampling. In: Chen P, Hsu L, Panchapakesan S (eds) Special Milton Sobel memorial issue. Commun Stat, Theory Methods 34:1275–1295

  • Mukhopadhyay N (2006) A personal tribute to Milton Sobel: selecting the best treatment. Seq Anal (Milton Sobel memorial issue-part I) 25:119–143

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N, Aoshima M (1998) Multivariate multistage methodologies for simultaneous all pairwise comparisons. Metrika 47:185–201

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N, Datta S, Chattopadhyay S (2004) Applied sequential methodologies, edited volume. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N, de Silva BM (2009) Sequential methods and their applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N, Duggan WT (1997) Can a two-stage procedure enjoy second-order properties? Sankhya, Ser A 59:435–448

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N, Solanky TKS (1994) Multistage selection and ranking procedures: second-order asymptotics. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N, Solanky TKS (1998) Multistage methodology for fixed-width simultaneous confidence intervals for all pairwise comparisons. J Stat Plan Inference 73:163–176

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay N, Solanky TKS (2002) Multistage methodologies for comparing several treatments with a control. J Stat Plan Inference 100:209–220

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rinott Y (1978) On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Commun Stat, Theory Methods 7:799–811

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Slepian D (1962) The one-sided barrier problem for Gaussian noise. Bell Syst Tech J 41:463–501

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stein C (1945) A two sample test for a linear hypothesis whose power is independent of the variance. Ann Math Stat 16:243–258

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stein C (1949) Some problems in sequential estimation (abstract). Econometrica 17:77–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong YL (1980) Probability inequalities in multivariate distributions. Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tong YL (1990) The multivariate normal distribution. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RR (1985) On comparing effects to a standard when the variances are unknown and unequal. J Educ Stat 10:45–54

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitis Mukhopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukhopadhyay, N., Solanky, T.K.S. On Two-Stage Comparisons with a Control Under Heteroscedastic Normal Distributions. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 14, 501–522 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-011-9241-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-011-9241-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2010)

Navigation