Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized Solution for Double-Porosity Flow Through a Graded Excavation Damaged Zone

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of flow to boreholes or excavations in fractured low-permeability rocks is important for resource extraction and disposal or sequestration activities. Analytical solutions for fluid pressure and flowrate, when available, are powerful, insightful, and efficient tools enabling parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification. A flexible porous media flow solution for arbitrary physical dimensions is derived and extended to double porosity for converging radial flow when permeability and porosity decrease radially as a power law away from a borehole or opening. This distribution can arise from damage accumulation due to stress relief associated with drilling or mining. The single-porosity graded conductivity solution was initially found for heat conduction, the arbitrary dimension flow solution comes from hydrology, and the solution with both arbitrary dimension and graded permeability distribution appeared in reservoir engineering. These existing solutions are combined and extended here to two implementations of the double-porosity conceptual model, for both a simpler thin-film mass transfer and more physically realistic diffusion between fracture and matrix. This work presents a new specified-flowrate solution with wellbore storage for the simpler double-porosity model, and a new, more physically realistic solution for any wellbore boundary condition. A new closed-form expression is derived for the matrix diffusion solution (applicable to both homogeneous and graded problems), improving on previous infinite series expressions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AbuAisha M, Billiotte J (2021) A discussion on hydrogen migration in rock salt for tight underground storage with an insight into a laboratory setup. J Energy Storage 38:102958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera R (1980) Naturally fractured reservoirs. PennWell Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkan H (2009) Percolation model for dilatancy-induced permeability of the excavation damaged zone in rock salt. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(4):716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Akagi T, Kawamoto T (1993) The squeezing potential of rocks around tunnels; theory and prediction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 26(2):137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt GI, Zheltov YP (1960) Basic flow equations for homogeneous fluids in naturally fractured rocks. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 132(3):545–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt GI, Zheltov YP, Kochina IN (1960) Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks [strata]. Prikladnaya Matematika i Mekhanika 24(5):852–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker JA (1988) A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock. Water Resour Res 24(10):1796–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauheim RL, Roberts RM (2002) Hydrology and hydraulic properties of a bedded evaporite formation. J Hydrol 259(1):66–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauheim RL, Roberts RM, Avis JD (2004) Well testing in fractured media: Flow dimension and diagnostic plots. J Hydraul Res 42:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdet D, Ayoub JA, Pirard YM (1989) Use of pressure derivative in well-test interpretation. SPE Form Eval 4(2):293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DO, Roberts RM, Holt RM (2013) Generalized radial flow in synthetic flow systems. Groundwater 51(5):768–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman F (1958) Introduction to bessel functions. Dover

  • Brady PV, Freeze GA, Kuhlman KL, Hardin EL, Sassani DC, MacKinnon RJ (2017) Deep borehole disposal of nuclear waste: US perspective. In: Geological repository systems for safe disposal of spent nuclear fuels and radioactive waste. Elsevier, pp 89–112

  • Carman PC (1937) Fluid flow through granular beds. Trans Inst Chem Eng 15:150–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd edn. Oxford

  • Chang J, Yortsos YC (1990) Pressure-transient analysis of fractured reservoirs. SPE Form Eval 5(1):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZX (1989) Transient flow of slightly compressible fluids through double-porosity, double-permeability systems - a state-of-the-art review. Transp Porous Media 4(2):147–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho WJ, Kim JS, Lee C, Choi HJ (2013) Gas permeability in the excavation damaged zone at KURT. Eng Geol 164(17):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clossman PJ (1975) An aquifer model for fissured reservoirs. Soc Petrol Eng J 15:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosenza PH (1996) Coupled effects between mechanical behavior and mass transfer phenomena in rock salt. PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique

  • Da Prat G (1990) Well test analysis for fractured reservoir evaluation. No. 27 in Developments in Petroleum Science, Elsevier

  • David C, Wong TF, Zhu W, Zhang J (1994) Laboratory measurement of compaction-induced permeability change in porous rocks: implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust. PAGEOPH 143(1/2/3):425–456

  • Davies C, Bernier F (eds) (2005) Impact of the excavation disturbed or damaged zone (EDZ) on the performance of radioactive waste geological repositories, EUR 21028 EN. Belgium, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hoog FR, Knight JH, Stokes AN (1982) An improved method for numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 3(3):357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De-Smedt F (2011) Analytical solution for constant-rate pumping test in fissured porous media with double-porosity behavior. Transp Porous Media 88:479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De-Smedt F (2022) Analytical solution for fractional well flow in a double-porosity aquifer with fraction transient exchange between matrix and fractures. Water 14(456)

  • De Swaan AO (1976) Analytic solutions for determining naturally fractured reservoir properties by well testing. Soc Petrol Eng J 16(03):117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delay F, Kaczmaryk A, Ackerer P (2007) Inversion of interference hydraulic pumping tests in both homogeneous and fractal dual media. Adv Water Resour 30:314–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DLMF (2023) NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. In: Olver FWJ, Olde Daalhuis AB, Lozier DW, Schneider BI, Boisvert RF, Clark CW, Miller BR, Saunders BV, Cohl HS, McClain MA (eds) http://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.1.12 of 2023-12-15

  • Doe TW (1991) Fractional dimension analysis of constant-pressure well tests. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, pp 461–467

  • Ferroud A, Chesnaux R, Rafini S (2018) Insights on pumping well interpretation from flow dimension analysis: The learnings of a multi-context field database. J Hydrol 556:449–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbard F (1992) Exact analysis of a two-dimensional model for brine flow to a borehole in a disturbed rock zone. Tech. Rep. SAND92–1303, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM

  • Ghazvinian E (2015) Fracture initiation and propagation in low porosity crystalline rocks: implications for excavation damage zone (EDZ) mechanics. PhD thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

  • Haggerty R, Gorelick SM (1995) Multiple-rate mass-transfer for modeling diffusion and surface-reactions in media with pore-scale heterogeneity. Water Resour Res 31(10):2383–2400

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty R, McKenna SA, Meigs LC (2000) On the late-time behavior of tracer test breakthrough curves. Water Resour Res 36(12):3467–3479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek M, Younes A, Zouali J , Fajraoui N, Fahs M (2018) Analytical solution and Bayesian inference for interference pumping tests in fractal dual-porosity media. Comput Geosci 22:413–421

  • Herrera I, Yates R (1977) Integrodifferential equations for systems of leaky aquifers and applications 3. A numerical method of unlimited applicability. Water Resour Res 13(4):725–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Z (2003) Mechanical and hydraulic behavior of rock salt in the excavation disturbed zone around underground facilities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(5):725–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA, Bäckström A, Rutqvist J, Jing L, Backers T, Chijimatsu M, Christiansson R, Feng X-T, Kobayashi A, Koyama T, Lee H-S, Neretnieks I, Pan P-Z, Rinne M, Shen B-T (2009) Characterising and modelling the excavation damaged zone in crystalline rock in the context of radioactive waste disposal. Environ Geol 57:1275–1297

  • Johansson F, Steinberg V, Kirpichev SB, Kuhlman KL, Meurer A, Čertík O, Van Horsen C, Masson P, deReyna JA, Hartmann T, Pernici M, Kagalenko M, Peterson P,Jȩdrzejewski-Szmek Z, Krastanov S, Warner J, Weckesser W,Buchert T, Schlömer N, Creus-Costa J, Ingold G-L, Behan C, BrysA (2017) mpmath: a Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1476882

  • Kazemi H (1969) Pressure transient analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs with uniform fracture distribution. Soc Petrol Eng J 9(04):451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HM, Rutqvist J, Jeong JH, Choi BH, Ryu DW, Song WK (2012) Characterizing excavation damaged zone and stability of pressurized lined rock caverns for underground compressed air energy storage. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:1113–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozeny J (1927) Uber kapillare leitung der wasser in boden. Proc Class I R Acad Sci Vienna 136:271–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranz RL, Frankel AD, Engelder T , Scholz CH (1979) The permeability of whole and jointed Barre granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts 16:225–234

  • Kruseman GP, de Ridder NA (1994) Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data. Tech. Rep. Publication 47, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands

  • Kuhlman KL (2013) Review of inverse Laplace transform algorithms for Laplace-space numerical approaches. Numer Algorith 63(2):339–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman KL (2014) Summary results for brine migration modeling performed by LANL, LBNL, and SNL for the UFD program. Tech. Rep. SAND2014–18217R, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 10.2172/1163122

  • Kuhlman KL, Heath JE (2021) Multicontinuum flow models for assessing two-phase flow in containment science. Tech. Rep. SAND2021-7191, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 10.2172/1809129

  • Kuhlman KL, Matteo EN (2018) Porosity and permeability: literature review and summary. SaltMechIX. Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hannover, Germany, pp 1–13

  • Kuhlman KL, Malama B, Heath JE (2015) Multiporosity flow in fractured low-permeability rocks. Water Resour Res 51(2):848–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman KL, Hardin EL, Rigali MJ (2019) Deep borehole laboratory and borehole testing strategy: Generic drilling and testing plan. Tech. Rep. SAND2019–1896, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 10.2172/1497220

  • Lai CS (1971) Fluid flow through rock salt under various stress states. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

  • Le Borgne T, Bour O, De Dreuzy JR, Davy P, Touchard F (2004) Equivalent mean flow models for fractured aquifers: insights from a pumping tests scaling interpretation. Water Resour Res 40(3)

  • Lin YC, Yang SY, Fen CS, Yeh HD (2016) A general analytical model for pumping tests in radial finite two-zone confined aquifers with Robin-type outer boundary. J Hydrol 540:1162–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HH (2014) Non-Darcian flow in low-permeability media: key issues related to geological disposal of high-level nuclear waste in shale formations. Hydrogeol J 22(7):1525–1534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HH (2017) Fluid flow in the subsurface. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lommel E (1868) Studien Über die Bessel’schen Functionen. Teubner, von B.G

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan NW (1955) Bessel functions for engineers, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra PK, Vessilinov V, Gupta H (2013) On simulation and analysis of variable-rate pumping tests. Groundwater 51(3):469–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moutsopoulos KN (2021) A simple model for the simulation of the flow behavior in unconfined double porosity aquifers. J Hydrol 596:126076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutsopoulos KN, Papaspyros JN, Fahs M (2022) Approximate solutions for flow in unconfined double porosity aquifers. J Hydrol 615:128679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasandi M, Samani N, Barry DA (2008) Effect of wellbore storage and finite thickness skin on flow to a partially penetrating well in a preatic aquifer. Adv Water Resour 31:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perras MA, Diederichs MS (2016) Predicting excvation damage zone depths in brittle rocks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(1):60–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perras MA, Diederichs MS, Lam T (2010) A review of excavation damage zones in sedimentary rocks with emphasis on numerical modelling for EDZ definition. In: Proceedings of the 63rd Canadian geotechnical conference, Calgary, Canada, pp 742–750

  • Reynolds TD, Gloyna EF (1960) Reactor fuel waste disposal project: Permeability of rock salt and creep of underground salt cavities. Tech. Rep. TID-12383, Atomic Energy Commission Division of Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN

  • Schumer R, Benson DA, Meerschaertm MM, Baeumer B (2003) Fractal mobile/immobile solute transport. Water Resour Res 39(10):1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen B, Stephansson O, Rinne M, Amemiya K, Yamashi R, Toguri S, Asano H (2011) FRACOD modeling of rock fracturing and permeability change in excavation-damaged zones. Int J Geomech 11(4):302–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanier J, Oldham KB (1987) An atlas of functions. Hemisphere

  • Stormont JC, Fuenkajorn K (1994) Dilation-induced permeability changes in rock salt. Int Conf Comput Methods Adv Geomech. Morgantown, West Virginia, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Stormont JC, Howard CL, Daemen JJK (1991) Changes in rock salt permeability due to nearby excavation. 32nd US symposium on rock mechanics. OnePetro, Norman, Oklahoma, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Streltsova TD (1988) Well testing in heterogeneous formations. Exxon Monograph, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao J, Shi AC, Li HT, Zhou JW, Yang XG, Lu GD (2021) Thermal-mechanical modelling of rock response and damage eveolution during excavation in prestressed goethermal deposits. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 147:104913

  • Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 16:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang CF, Bernier F, Davies C (2005) Geohydromechanical processes in the excavation damaged zone in crystalline rock, rock salt, and indurated and plastic clays-in the context of radioactive waste disposal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(1):109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Golf-Racht TD (1982) Fundamentals of fractured reservoir engineering. No. 12 in Developments in Petroleum Science, Elsevier

  • Wallace M, Pietz J, Case J, Deal, D, Lauctes B (1990) Coupled fluid-flow modeling of brines flowing through deforming salt around the excavations for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), in the Permian Salado Formation. Waste Management 90. Tucson, AZ, pp 1–8

  • Wang Y, Zhan H, Huang K , He L, Wan J (2021) Identification of non-Darcian flow effect in double-porosity fracture aquifer based on multi-well pumping test. J Hydrol 600:126541

  • Warren J, Root P (1963) The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc Petrol Eng J 3(03):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram Research, Inc. (2021) Mathematica, Version 12.3. https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica, champaign, IL

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper describes objective technical results and analysis. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government. This article has been authored by an employee of National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC under Contract No. DE-NA0003525 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The employee owns all right, title and interest in and to the article and is solely responsible for its content. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this article or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan https://www.energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan. The author thanks Tara LaForce from Sandia for technically reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristopher L. Kuhlman.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The author thanks the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy’s Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology program for funding.

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

Data Availability

No unpublished data or materials were used by the author in the preparation of the manuscript.

Code Availability

The source code of Fortran and Python implementations of the program are available from the author upon request.

Appendices

Appendix A: Wellbore Storage Boundary Condition

The wellbore storage boundary condition accounts for the storage in the finite borehole arising from the mass balance \(Q_{\textrm{in}}-Q_{\textrm{out}}=A_c \frac{\partial h_w}{\partial t}\). \(Q_{\textrm{in}}\) \(\mathrm {[m^3/s]}\) is the volumetric flow into the borehole from the formation, \(Q_{\textrm{out}}\) is possibly time-variable flow out of the well through the pump (Q(t) \(\mathrm {[m^3/s]}\)), and \(\frac{\partial h_w}{\partial t}\) is the change in hydraulic head [m] (\(h_w=\frac{p_w}{\rho g} + z\)) of water standing in the borehole through time, \(p_w\) is change in pressure [Pa] of water in the borehole, \(\rho \) is fluid density \(\mathrm {[kg/m^3]}\), z is an elevation datum [m], and g is gravitational acceleration \(\mathrm {[m/s^2]}\). \(A_c\) is the cross-sectional surface area of the pipe, sphere, or box providing storage (it may be a constant or a function of elevation); for a typical pipe, it becomes \(A_c=\pi r_c^2\), where \(r_c\) is the radius of the casing where the water level is changing. The mass balance is then

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{A_m k_0}{\mu } \left. \frac{\partial p}{\partial r} \right| _{r=r_w} - Q(t) = \frac{A_c}{\rho g} \frac{\partial p_w}{\partial t}, \end{aligned}$$
(35)

where \(A_m\) is the area of the borehole communicating with the formation. For the integer m considered here these are \(A_0=b^2\), \(A_1=2 \pi r_w b\), \(A_2=4 \pi r_w^2\) (b is a length independent of the borehole radius).

Assuming the change in water level in the borehole (\(h_w=p_w/\left( \rho g\right) \)) is equal to the change in formation water level (\(h=p/\left( \rho g\right) \)), this can be converted into dimensionless form as

$$\begin{aligned} \left. \frac{\partial p_D}{\partial r_D} \right| _{r_D=1} - f_t = \sigma \frac{\partial p_D}{\partial t}, \end{aligned}$$
(36)

where \(\sigma =A_c/\left( r_w n_0 c \rho g A_m \right) \) is a dimensionless ratio of formation to wellbore storage; \(\sigma \rightarrow 0\) is an infinitesimally small well with only formation response, while \(\sigma \rightarrow \infty \) is a well with no formation response (i.e., a bathtub).

Appendix B: Transformation of Modified Bessel Equation

Following the approach of Bowman (1958), alternative forms of the Bessel equation are found; this approach is a simplification of the original approach of Lommel (1868). An analogous approach is applied here to “back into” the desired modified Bessel equation. The equation satisfied by the pair of functions

$$\begin{aligned} y_1&=x^\alpha \textrm{I}_\nu \left( \beta x^\gamma \right) ,&y_2&=x^\alpha \textrm{K}_\nu \left( \beta x^\gamma \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(37)

is sought, where \(\alpha \), \(\beta \), \(\gamma \), and \(\nu \) are constants. Using the substitutions \(\zeta =yx^{-\alpha }\) and \(\xi =\beta x^\gamma \) gives \(\zeta _1=\textrm{I}_\nu \left( \xi \right) \) and \(\zeta _2=\textrm{K}_\nu \left( \xi \right) \), which are the two solutions to the modified Bessel equation (DLMF 2023, §10.25.1),

$$\begin{aligned} \xi \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\xi } \left( \xi \frac{\textrm{d}\zeta }{\textrm{d}\xi }\right) - (\xi ^2 + \nu ) \zeta = 0. \end{aligned}$$
(38)

Given

$$\begin{aligned} \xi \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}\xi } \left( \xi \frac{\textrm{d}\zeta }{\textrm{d}\xi }\right) = \frac{x}{\gamma ^2} \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}x} \left( x \frac{\textrm{d}\zeta }{\textrm{d}x} \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(39)

and

$$\begin{aligned} x \frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}x} \left( x \frac{\textrm{d}\zeta }{\textrm{d}x} \right) = \frac{y''}{x^{\alpha -2}} - \frac{\left( 2 \alpha -1 \right) y'}{x^{\alpha -1}} + \frac{\alpha ^2 y}{x^\alpha }, \end{aligned}$$
(40)

the standard-form equation satisfied by y is

$$\begin{aligned} y'' + \left( 1-2 \alpha \right) y' + \frac{\alpha ^2 y}{x^\alpha } - \left( \beta ^2 \gamma ^2 x^{2\gamma -2} - \frac{\alpha ^2 - \nu ^2 \gamma ^2}{x^2} \right) y = 0. \end{aligned}$$
(41)

This equation can be compared to the Laplace-space ordinary differential Eq. (9), allowing direct use of the product of powers and modified Bessel function (37) as solutions (13).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuhlman, K.L. Generalized Solution for Double-Porosity Flow Through a Graded Excavation Damaged Zone. Math Geosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-024-10143-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-024-10143-8

Keywords

Navigation