Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploratory Factor Analysis of Wireline Logs Using a Float-Encoded Genetic Algorithm

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper, a novel inversion approach is used for the solution of the problem of factor analysis. The float-encoded genetic algorithm as a global optimization method is implemented to extract factor variables using open-hole logging data. The suggested statistical workflow is used to give a reliable estimate for not only the factors but also the related petrophysical properties in hydrocarbon formations. In the first step, the factor loadings and scores are estimated by Jöreskog’s fast approximate method, which are gradually improved by the genetic algorithm. The forward problem is solved to calculate wireline logs directly from the factor scores. In each generation, the observed and calculated well logs are compared to update the factor population. During the genetic algorithm run, the average fitness of factor populations is maximized to give the best fit between the observed and theoretical data. By using the empirical relation between the first factor and formation shaliness, the shale volume is estimated along the borehole. Permeability as a derived quantity also correlates with the first factor, which allows its determination from an independent source. The estimation results agree well with those of independent deterministic modeling and core measurements. Case studies from Hungary and the USA demonstrate the feasibility of the global optimization based factor analysis, which provides a useful tool for improved reservoir characterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akça I, Basokur AT (2010) Extraction of structure-based geoelectric models by hybrid genetic algorithms. Geophysics 75:F15–F22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez JPF, Martínez JLF, Pérez COM (2008) Feasibility analysis of the use of binary genetic algorithms as importance samplers application to a 1-D DC resistivity inverse problem. Math Geosci 40:375–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asfahani J (2014) Statistical factor analysis technique for characterizing basalt through interpreting nuclear and electrical well logging data (case study from Southern Syria). Appl Radiat Isot 84:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett MS (1937) The statistical conception of mental factors. Br J Psychol 28:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Basilevsky A (1994) Statistical factor analysis and related methods: theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 367–381

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bóna A, Slawinski MA, Smith P (2009) Ray tracing by simulated annealing: bending method. Geophysics 74:T25–T32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschetti F, Dentith MC, List RD (1996) Inversion of seismic refraction data using genetic algorithms. Geophysics 61:1715–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Changchun Y, Hodges G (2007) Simulated annealing for airborne EM inversion. Geophysics 72:F189–F195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranganu C, Luchian H, Breaban ME (2015) Artificial intelligent approaches in petroleum geosciences. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobróka M, Szabó NP (2011) Interval inversion of well-logging data for objective determination of textural parameters. Acta Geophys 59:907–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobróka M, Szabó NP (2012) Interval inversion of well-logging data for automatic determination of formation boundaries by using a float-encoded genetic algorithm. J Pet Sci Eng 86–87:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobróka M, Szabó NP, Tóth J, Vass P (2016) Interval inversion approach for an improved interpretation of well logs. Geophysics 81:D163–D175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorrington KP, Link CA (2004) Genetic-algorithm/neural-network approach to seismic attribute selection for well-log prediction. Geophysics 69:212–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Z, Yang D (2015) Inversion of reservoir porosity, saturation, and permeability based on a robust hybrid genetic algorithm. Geophysics 80:R265–R280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gryc G (1988) Geology and exploration of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, 1974 to 1982. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1399:1–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck CR, Joines J, Kay M (1995) A genetic algorithm for function optimization: a Matlab implementation. In: NCSU-IE technical report 95-09. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, pp 1–14

  • Jöreskog KG (2007) Factor analysis and its extensions. In: Cudeck R, MacCallum RC (eds) Factor analysis at 100, historical developments and future directions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 47–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1958) The varimax criterion for analytical rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keprt A, Snášel V (2005) Binary factor analysis with genetic algorithms. In: Abraham A, Dote Y, Furuhashi T, Köppen M, Ohuchi A, Ohsawa (eds) Soft computing as transdisciplinary science and technology. Proceedings of the fourth IEEE International workshop WSTST’05. Springer, Berlin, pp 1259–1268

  • Larionov VV (1969) Radiometry of boreholes. Nedra, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley DN, Maxwell AE (1962) Factor analysis as a statistical method. The Statistician 12:209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menke W (1984) Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z (1992) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski A (2013) Global optimization: theory, developments and applications. In: Mathematics research developments. Computational mathematics and analysis series. Nova Science Publishers, New York

  • Puskarczyk E, Jarzyna J, Porebski Sz (2015) Application of multivariate statistical methods for characterizing heterolithic reservoirs based on wireline logs—example from the Carpathian Foredeep Basin (Middle Miocene, SE Poland). Geol Q 59:157–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao BN, Pal PC (1980) Factor analysis for interpreting petrophysical data on Roro ultramafics, Singhbhum district, India. Geophys Prospect 28:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen MK, Bhattacharya BB, Stoffa PL (1993) Nonlinear inversion of resistivity sounding data. Geophysics 58:496–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen MK, Stoffa PL (2013) Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol 15:72–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner F (1991) The most frequent value: introduction to a modern conception of statistics. Academic Press, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó NP (2011) Shale volume estimation based on the factor analysis of well-logging data. Acta Geophys 59:935–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó NP, Dobróka M (2013) Extending the application of a shale volume estimation formula derived from factor analysis of wireline logging data. Math Geosci 45:837–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó NP, Balogh GP (2016) Most frequent value based factor analysis of engineering geophysical sounding logs. In: 78th EAGE conference and exhibition, paper Tu SBT4 12. Vienna, pp 1–5

  • Szabó NP, Dobróka M (2017) Robust estimation of reservoir shaliness by iteratively reweighted factor analysis. Geophysics 82:D69–D83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timur A (1968) An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationship for sandstone reservoirs. Log Anal 9:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (1999) Selected data from eleven wildcat wells in the national petroleum reserve in Alaska. In: USGS open file report 99–015. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1999/ofr-99-0015/ofr-99-0015.html

  • Yang H, Bozdogan H (2011) Learning factor patterns in exploratory factor analysis using the genetic algorithm and information complexity as the fitness function. J Pattern Recognit Res 6:307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00010 “Development of enhanced engineering methods with the aim at utilization of subterranean energy resources” project in the framework of the Széchenyi 2020 Plan, funded by the European Union, cofinanced by the European Structural and Investment Funds. The first author thanks the support of the GINOP project. The research was partly supported by the National Research Development and Innovation Office (Project No. K109441), and as the leader of the project, the second author thanks the Office for its support. Both authors thank the Geokomplex Ltd. for providing well logs and grain-size data from Well-3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Péter Szabó.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szabó, N.P., Dobróka, M. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Wireline Logs Using a Float-Encoded Genetic Algorithm. Math Geosci 50, 317–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9714-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9714-x

Keywords

Navigation