Abstract
Length, height, thickness and spacing measurements of pressure solution seams at outcrop, hand sample and thin section scale were taken from clastic rocks located in the southwest of Ireland. The lengths and spacings of pressure solution seams have similarly shaped (approximately log-hyperbolic) distributions at the observed scales suggesting that length and spacing distributions are scale-independent over the scales studied with a fractal dimension in the range of 1.4 to 1.6. Pressure solution seam lengths and thicknesses are related by a power-law and their spacings have a linear relationship to bed thickness. Although pressure solution seams are often considered as anticracks (forming under the same remote stresses as joints, but with opposite sign) we describe how the mechanism of pressure solution differs substantially from that of jointing. We use an existing mechanical model to show that stresses around pressure solution seam tips are much lower than those for joints under equal but opposite loading conditions. Pressure solution seams also have a decreasing tendency to lengthen as they grow, which is reflected in their length distributions. We propose that pressure solution seams, unlike joints, do not reach fracture saturation spacing because of transverse coalescence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agosta F, Alessandroni M, Tondi E, Aydin A (2010) Oblique normal faulting along the northern edge of the Majella Anticline, central Italy: inferences on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. J Struct Geol 32:1317–1333
Alvarez W, Engelder T, Geiser PA (1978) Classification of solution cleavage in pelagic limestones. Geology 6:263–266
Andrews LM, Railsback LB (1997) Controls on stylolite development: morphologic, lithologic and temporal evidence from bedding parallel and transverse stylolites from the US Appalachians. J Geol 105:59–73
Ayling MR, Meredith PG, Murrell SAF (1995) Microcracking during triaxial deformation of porous rocks monitored by changes in rock physical properties, I. Elastic-wave propagation measurements on dry rocks. Tectonophysics 245:205–221
Bai T, Pollard DD (2000a) Fracture spacing in layered rocks: a new explanation based on the stress transition. J Struct Geol 22:43–57
Bai T, Pollard DD (2000b) Closely spaced fractures in layered rocks: initiation mechanism and propagation kinematics. J Struct Geol 22:1049–1425
Barton CC (1995) Fractal analysis of scaling and spatial clustering of fractures. In: Barton CC, LaPointe PR (eds) Fractals in the Earth Sciences. Plenum, New York, pp 141–178
Benedicto A, Schultz RA (2010) Stylolites in limestone: magnitude of contractional strain accommodated and scaling relationships. J Struct Geol 32:1250–1256
Bloomfield J (1996) Characterization of hydrogeologically significant fracture distributions in the Chalk: an example of the Upper Chalk of southern England. J Hydrol 184:355–379
Bonnet E, Bour O, Odling NE, Davy P, Main I, Cowie P, Berkowitz B (2001) Scaling of fracture systems in geological media. Rev Geophys 39:347–383
Brace WF, Paulding BW, Scholz C (1966) Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res 71:3939–3953
Caers J, Vynckier P, Beirlant J, Rombouts L (1996) Extreme value analysis of diamond-size distributions. Math Geol 28:25–43
Carrio-Schaffhauser E, Raynaud S, Latiere HJ, Mazerolle F (1990) Propagation and localization of stylolites in limestones, deformation mechanisms, rheology and tectonics. Geol Soc Spec Publ 54:193–199
Clark MB, Brantley SL, Fisher DM (1995) Power-law vein-thickness distributions and positive feedback in vein growth. Geology 23:975–978
Cooper MA, Collins DA, Ford M, Murphy FX, Trayner PM, O’Sullivan M (1986) Structural evolution of the Irish Variscades. J Geol Soc (Lond) 143:53–61
Drummond CN, Sexton DN (1998) Fractal structure of stylolites. J Sediment Res 68:8–10
Dunnington HV (1967) Aspects of diagenesis and shape change in stylolitic limestone reservoirs. In: Proceedings 7th World petroleum congress, Mexico, vol 2, pp 339–352
Engelder T (1982) Fossils record the force of continental collision Lamont–Doherty. In: Geological Observatory of Columbia University Yearbook 1981–1982, vol 8, pp 37–39
Fletcher RC, Pollard DD (1981) Anticrack model for pressure solution surfaces. Geology 9:419–424
Ford M, Ferguson CC (1985) Cleavage strain in the Variscan fold belt, County Cork, Ireland, estimated from stretched arsenopyrite rosettes. J Struct Geol 7:217–223
Fossen H, Hesthammer J (2000) Possible absence of small faults in the Gullfaks Field, northern North Sea: implications for downscaling of faults in porous sandstones. J Struct Geol 22:851–863
Gillespie PA, Howard CB, Walsh JJ, Watterson J (1993) Measurement and characterization of spatial distributions of fractures. Tectonophysics 226:113–141
Gillespie PA, Walsh JJ, Watterson J, Bonson CG, Manzocchi T (2001) Scaling relationships of joint and vein arrays from the Burren, Co. Clare, Ireland. J Struct Geol 23:183–201
Graham-Wall BR (2006) Influence of depositional setting and sedimentary fabric on mechanical layer evolution in carbonate aquifers. Sediment Geol 184:203–224
Graham-Wall BR, Girbacea R, Mesonjesi A, Aydin A (2006) Evolution of fracture and fault-controlled fluid pathways in carbonates of the Albanides fold-thrust belt. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 90:1227–1249
Griggs D, Handin J (1960) Observations on fracture and a hypothesis of earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Mem 79:347–364
Groshong RH Jr (1988) Low-temperature deformation mechanisms and their interpretation. Geol Soc Am Bull 100:1329–2360
Gross MR (1993) The origin and spacing of cross joints: examples from the Monterey Formation, Santa Barbara Coastline, California. J Struct Geol 15:737–751
Helgeson D, Aydin A (1991) Characteristics of joint propagation across layer interfaces in sedimentary rocks. J Struct Geol 13:897–911
Hewett TA (1994) Fractal methods for fracture characterization. In: Yarus JM, Chambers RL (eds) Stochastic modeling and geostatistics, vol 3. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Computer Applications in Geology, Tulsa, pp 249–260
Holder J, Olsen JE, Philip Z (2001) Experimental determination of subcritical crack growth parameters in sedimentary rock. Geophys Res Lett 28:599–602
Hurd DC, Theyer F (1975) Changes in the physical and chemical properties of biogenic silica from the Central Equatorial Pacific. I. Solubility, specific surface area, and solution rate constants of acid-cleaned samples. In: Advances in Chemistry, vol 147, pp 211–230
Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 561 pp
Katsman R, Aharonov E, Scher H (2006) A numerical study on localized volume reduction in elastic media: some insights on the mechanics of anticracks. J Geophys Res 111:B03204
Lachenbruch AH (1961) Depth and spacing of tension cracks. J Geophys Res 66:4273–4292
Ladeira FL, Price NJ (1981) Relationship between fracture spacing and bed thickness. J Struct Geol 3:179–183
Lawn BR, Wilshaw TR (1975) Fracture of brittle solids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 204 pp
Lodder R, Hieftje G (1988) Quantile analysis: a method for characterizing data distributions. Appl Spectrosc 42:1512–1520
Mardon D (1988) Localized pressure solution and the formation of discrete solution seams. PhD thesis, College Station, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
Marrett R, Ortega OJ, Kelsey CM (1999) Extent of power-law scaling for natural fractures in rock. Geology 27:799–802
Meere PA (1995) The structural evolution of the western Irish Variscades: an example of obstical tectonics? Techtonophysics 246:97–112
Merino E, Ortoleva P, Strickholm P (1983) Generation of evenly-spaced pressure solution seams during (late) diagenesis: a kinetic theory. Contrib Mineral Petrol 82:360–370
Narr W, Suppe J (1991) Joint spacing in sedimentary rocks. J Struct Geol 11:1037–1048
Nenna F, Aydin A (2011a) The formation and growth of pressure solution seams in clastic rocks: a field and analytical study. J Struct Geol 33:633–643
Nenna F, Aydin A (2011b) The role of pressure solution seam and joint assemblages in the formation of strike-slip and thrust faults in a compressive tectonic setting: the Variscan of southwest Ireland. J Struct Geol 33:1595–1610
Olson JE (2003) Sublinear scaling of fracture aperture versus length: an exception or the rule? J Geophys Res 108(B9):2413
Olson JE (2004) Predicting fracture swarms—the influence of subcritical crack growth and the crack-tip process zone on joint spacing in rock. In: Engelder T, Gosgrove JW (eds) The initiation, propagation, and arrest of joints and other fractures. Special publications, vol 231. Geological Society, London, pp 73–87
Onasch CM (1993) Determination of pressure solution shortening in sandstones. Tectonophysics 227:145–159
Peacock DCP, Azzam IN (2006) Development of scaling relationships of a stylolite population. J Struct Geol 28:1883–1889
Pyles DR (2008) Multiscale stratigraphic analysis of a structurally confined submarine fan: carboniferous Ross Sandstone, Ireland. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 92:557–587
Railsback B (1998) Evaluation of spacing of stylolites and its implications for self-organization of pressure dissolution. J Sediment Res 68:2–7
Renard F, Ortoleva P, Gratier JP (1997) Pressure solution in sandstones: influence of clays and dependence on temperature and stress. Tectonophysics 280:257–266
Renshaw CE, Pollard DD (1994) Numerical simulation of fracture set formation: a fracture mechanics model consistent with experimental observations. J Geophys Res 99:9359–9372
Renshaw CE, Park JC (1997) Effect of mechanical interactions on the scaling of fracture length and aperture. Nature 386:482–484
Rider MH (1974) The Namurian of West County Clare. Proc R Ir Acad 74B:125–143
Rives T, Razack M, Petit J-P, Rawnsley KD (1992) Joint spacing: analogue and numerical simulations. J Struct Geol 14:925–937
Ruf JC, Rust KA, Engelder T (1998) Investigating the effect of mechanical discontinuities on joint spacing. Tectonophysics 295:245–257
Scholz CH (2002) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 471 pp
Schultz RA, Soliva R, Fossen H, Okubo CH, Reeves DM (2008) Dependence of displacement–length scaling relations for fractures and deformation bands on volumetric changes across them. J Struct Geol 30:1405–1411
Segall P, Pollard DD (1983) Joint formation in granitic rock of the Sierra Nevada. Geol Soc Am Bull 94:563–575
Sleeman AG, Pracht M (1994) Geology of South Cork. Geological survey of Ireland, 58 pp
Sleeman AG, Pracht M (1999) Geology of the Shannon Estuary. Geological survey of Ireland, 77 pp
Stockdale B (1922) Stylolites: their nature and origin. Indiana University studies, vol IX, 97 pp
Tavani S, Storti F, Muñoz JA (2010) Scaling relationships between stratabound pressure solution cleavage and layer thickness in a folded carbonate multilayer of the Northern Apennines (Italy). J Struct Geol 32:278–287
Vermilye JM, Scholz CH (1995) Relation between vein length and aperture. J Struct Geol 17:423–434
Vermilye JM, Scholz CH (1998) The process zone: a microstructural view of fault growth. J Geophys Res 103:12223–12237
Villaescusa E, Brown ET (1992) Maximum likelihood estimation of joint size from trace length measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 25:67–87
Walsh JJ, Watterson J (1993) Fractal analysis of fracture patterns using the standard box-counting technique: valid and invalid methodologies. J Struct Geol 15:1509–1512
Willemse EJM, Pollard DD (1998) On the orientation and patterns of wing cracks and solution surfaces at the tips of a sliding flaw or fault. J Geophys Res 103:2427–2438
Wu H, Pollard DD (1995) An experimental study of the relationships between joint spacing and layer thickness. J Struct Geol 17:887–905
Yielding G, Walsh JJ, Watterson J (1992) The prediction of small-scale faulting in regional extension. First Break 10:449–460
Zhou X, Aydin A (2010) Mechanics of pressure solution growth and evolution. J Geophys Res 115:B12207
Acknowledgements
Thanks go to Pat Meere and Chloe Parker of University College Cork and Chris Wilson and Vanessa Nenna of Stanford University for their assistance and discussion during fieldwork. We are also grateful to Jef Caers and Alexander Boucher for their assistance with the processing of statistical data. Improvements to the manuscript suggested by John Walsh and one anonymous reviewer were very much appreciated. This work was funded by the Stanford Rock Fracture Project and by a Levorsen Grant from Stanford School of Earth Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Configurations for Near-Tip Stress Distributions Associated with Pressure Solution Seams and Joints
Appendix: Configurations for Near-Tip Stress Distributions Associated with Pressure Solution Seams and Joints
To study the stresses at the tips of closing mode fractures and their possible reflections in the PSS statistics, we use the finite element mechanical model of Zhou and Aydin (2010). PSSs are idealized as elliptical local volume reduction structures (LVRSs) within a rock mass behaving in a linear elastic manner with Young’s modulus of 20 GPa and Poisson’s ratio of 0.25. An initial plastic volumetric strain of 20 % is set within the LVRSs which has the same elastic properties as the matrix. The remote compressive stress applied perpendicularly to the long axis of the LVRS is 100 MPa. The location at which the stress is calculated is at a distance, r, from the tip in the plane of the structure where r is 1.6 % of the half-length, \(\frac{1}{2} L=a\) (Fig. 11). This distance is just outside of a potential process zone where high stresses are accommodated by processes that are not conceptualized as purely elastic (Willemse and Pollard 1998; Vermilye and Scholz 1998).
We use the analytical solution for opening mode crack near-tip stress intensity factor described by Lawn and Wilshaw (1975) to compare the tip stress magnitudes of joints to those of PSSs. To make comparisons to the closing mode model, the matrix surrounding the crack is assumed to have Young’s modulus of 20 GPa and Poisson’s ratio of 0.25 and the remote tensile stress of 100 MPa is applied perpendicularly to the long axis of the crack (Fig. 11) in order to compare it with that of the LVRS. Unlike in the closing mode case, the stress concentration result of the joint model is not dependent on its aspect ratio. The aperture/length ratio for joints in the literature is on the order of 1000 (Vermilye and Scholz 1995; Renshaw and Park 1997; Olson 2003; Schultz et al. 2008), which is one or two orders of magnitude higher than that of the PSSs measured in this study.
The stress distributions around the tip of an LVRS and an opening mode crack are also determined using the model described in Zhou and Aydin (2010). We model an LVRS with an aspect ratio of 100, consistent with our data, and an opening mode crack with an aspect ratio of 1000, which is consistent with published data and is comparable to that for the analytical solution for cracks. The opening mode crack is also modeled as an inclusion in the same way as an LVRS, but with Young’s modulus very close to zero (Fig. 13).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nenna, F., Zhou, X. & Aydin, A. Spatial Statistical Properties of Pressure Solution Seams in Clastic Rocks in Southwest Ireland. Math Geosci 44, 595–617 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9407-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9407-4