Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Target Method for the Statistical Processing of the Results of Tensile Testing of Defective Pipes

  • Published:
Materials Science Aims and scope

We develop statistical methods for the comparative analysis of the accuracy of relations used for the determination of the residual strength of plastic pipes with rectangular surface defects. In the existing approaches, the accuracy of relations is established for the entire set of experiments as a single generalized value. At the same time, in the present work, the corresponding values are established separately for every fixed collection of the sizes of defects (points of interest). For each test, we determine its weight, which is not larger than one at every point of interest. The statistical analysis of accuracy is performed separately for each point of interest, which enables us to smooth out the experimental errors and determine the error of the formula itself more precisely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Bhardwaj, A. P. Teixeira, and C. Guedes Soares, “Uncertainty quantification of burst pressure models of corroded pipelines,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 188, 104208 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. K. S. Inkabi and R. G. Bea, “Burst database verification study for corroded line-pipe,” in: Proc. of the 23rd Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (June 20–25, 2004, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), Vol. 2, ASME (2004), pp. 45–53; https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2004-51036.

  3. V. Chauhan and J. Brister, A Review of Methods for Assessing the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, Report No. 6781, GL Industrial Services UK Ltd. (2009).

  4. M. Staat, “Plastic collapse analysis of longitudinally flawed pipes and vessels,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 234, Nos. 1-3, 25–43 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.08.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. El Amine Ben Seghier, B. Keshtegar, and B. Elahmoune, “Reliability analysis of low, mid and high-grade strength corroded pipes based on plastic flow theory using adaptive nonlinear conjugate map,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 90, 245–261 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X.-K. Zhu and B. N. Leis, “Evaluation of burst pressure prediction models for line pipes,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 89, 85–97 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.09.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Kiefner, P. H. Vieth, and I. Roytman, Continued Validation of RSTRENG. Report on PR-218-9304 to Pipeline Supervisory Committee, Report Catalog No. L51749, PRCI (1996).

  8. M. Witek, “Structural integrity of steel pipeline with clusters of corrosion defects,” Materials, 14, No. 4, 1–15 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Zhou and G. X. Huang, “Model error assessments of burst capacity models for corroded pipelines,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 99–100, 1–8 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.06.001.

  10. R. Amaya-Gómez, M. Sánchez-Silva, E. Bastidas-Arteaga, F. Schoefs, and F. Muñoz, “Reliability assessments of corroded pipelines based on internal pressure – A review,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 98, 190–214 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.064.

  11. M. Ahammed and R. E. Melchers, “Reliability of underground pipelines subject to corrosion,” J. Transp. Eng., 120, No. 6, 989–1002 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1994)120:6(989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Li, J. Wang, R. Abbassi, and G. Chen, “A risk assessment framework considering uncertainty for corrosion-induced natural gas pipeline accidents,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 75, 104718 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Witek, A. Batura, I. Orynyak, and M. Borodii, “An integrated risk assessment of onshore gas transmission pipelines based on defect population,” Eng. Struct., 173, 150–165 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Yu, W. Huang, K. Wen, J. Zhang, H. Liu, K. Wang, J. Gong, and C. Qu, “Subset simulation-based reliability analysis of the corroding natural gas pipeline,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 213, 10766 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Zheng, A. K. Abdelmoety, Y. Li, M. Kainat, N. Yoosef-Ghodsi, and S. Adeeb, “Reliability analysis of intact and defected pipes for internal pressure related limit states specified in CSA Z622:19,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 192, 104411 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. A. Netto, U. S. Ferraz, and S. F. Estefen, “The effect of corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines,” J. Constr. Steel Res., 61, No. 8, 1185–1204 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. S. Cronin, Assessment of Corrosion Defects in Pipelines, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2000). http://hdl.handle.net/10012/478.

  18. Recommended Practice DNVGL-RP-F101: Corroded Pipelines, DNVGL (2017); https://www.dnvgl.com/oilgas/download/dnvgl-rpf101-corroded-pipelines.html.

  19. I. Orynyak, J. Bai, and R. Mazuryk, “Analytical limit load procedure for the axial complex shaped defect in a pressurized pipe,” J. Press. Vess-T ASME, 144, No. 4, 041305 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. M. Torop and I. V. Orynyak, “The evaluation of the structural strength of pipes and pressure vessels with axial cracks,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 53, No. 1, 159–179 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(93)90109-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Z. Yan, S. Zhang, and W. Zhou, “Model error assessment of burst capacity models for energy pipelines containing surface cracks,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 120–121, No. 1, 80–92 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.05.007.

  22. L. Guo, M. Niffenegger, and Z. Jing, “Statistical inference and performance evaluation for failure assessment models of pipeline with external axial surface cracks,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 194, 104480 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Stoppler, D. Sturm, P. Scott, and G. Wilkowski, “Analysis of the failure behavior of longitudinally flawed pipes and vessels,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 151, Nos. 2-3, 425–448 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)90186-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Staat and D. K. Vu, “Limit analysis of flaws in pressurized pipes and cylindrical vessels. Part I: Axial defects,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 74, No. 3, 431–450 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Abdel Ghani, G. Tewfik, and D. Djahida, “Determination of limit load solution for the remaining load-carrying capacity of corroded pipelines,” J. Press. Vess-T ASME, 138, No. 5, 051701 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033090.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. X. K. Zhu, “A comparative study of burst failure models for assessing remaining strength of corroded pipelines,” J. Pipeline Sci. Eng., 1, No. 1, 36–50 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Krasovskii, I. Orynyak, and V. Torop, “Ductile failure of cylindrical bodies with axial cracks loaded by internal pressure,” Strength Mater., 22, No. 2, 172–177 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A. R. Duffy, G. M. McClure, R. J. Eiber, and W. A. Maxey, “Fracture design practice for pressure piping,” in: H. Liebowitz (editor), Fracture: an Advanced Treatise, Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York (1969), pp. 159–232.

    Google Scholar 

  29. I. V. Orynyak, N. I. Vlasenko, V. Y. Kozlov, Y. A. Andrieshin, E. V. Chechin, K. P. Buiskikh, S. M. Ageev, and O. A. Yanko, “Test results for edge-notched pipe specimens within framework of experimental substantiation of the leak-before-break phenomenon,” Strength Mater., 44, No. 5, 562–573 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-012-9409-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. T. Amano and H. Makino, “Evaluation of leak/rupture behavior for axially part-through-wall notched high-strength line pipes,” in: Proc. of the 9th Int. Pipeline Conf. (Calgary, Alberta, Canada), Vol. 3, IPC (2012), pp. 219–227; https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2012-90216.

  31. S. Kawaguchi, N. Hagiwara, T. Masuda, and M. Toyoda, “Evaluation of leak-before-break (LBB) behavior for axially notched X65 and X80 line pipes,” J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 126, No. 4, 350–357 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1834619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine

    I. V. Orynyak, R. V. Mazuryk & V. V. Marchenko

  2. JSC “Ukrtransnafta”, Kyiv, Ukraine

    А. І. Oryniyak

Authors
  1. I. V. Orynyak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. V. Mazuryk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. V. Marchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. А. І. Oryniyak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. V. Mazuryk.

Additional information

Translated from Fizyko-Khimichna Mekhanika Materialiv, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 49–58, May–June, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orynyak, I.V., Mazuryk, R.V., Marchenko, V.V. et al. Target Method for the Statistical Processing of the Results of Tensile Testing of Defective Pipes. Mater Sci 58, 331–342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-023-00668-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-023-00668-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation