Abstract
Research on the role of identity in choice varies widely across fields like psychology, philosophy, consumer behavior, and economics, in both the key questions addressed and the methods of investigation. Although a large literature has established how salient aspects of identity affect attitudes and norms, less is known about how beliefs concerning identity are shaped and how these beliefs affect decision making. In this review, we cover recent insights into these issues and summarize some newer, developing approaches to understanding (i) how people judge the persistence of identity, (ii) how beliefs about future changes in identity are formed and how they affect choices, (iii) the formation of beliefs about future changes in identity and how these beliefs affect decisions, and (iv) the historical and economic antecedents of identity norms and their consequences for economic behavior. We introduce a distinction between synchronic and diachronic approaches, and highlight important unresolved questions that will help these fields to more fully understand the role that identity plays in shaping choices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.
Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2010). Identity economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 469–530.
Bartels, D. M., & Rips, L. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 49–69.
Bartels, D. M., & Urminsky, O. (2011). On intertemporal selfishness: the perceived instability of identity underlies impatient consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 182–198.
Bartels, D. M., Kvaran, T., & Nichols, S. (2013). Selfless giving. Cognition, 129, 392–403.
Bartels, D. M., Urminsky O., Frederick S. (2014). To know and to care: how awareness and valuation of the future jointly shape consumer savings and spending, working paper
Benjamin, D. J., Choi, J. J., & Strickland, A. J. (2010). Social identity and preferences. The American Economic Review, 100(4), 1913.
Blok, S., Newman, G., Behr, J., Rips, L.J. (2001). Inferences about personal identity, Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 80–85.
Blok, S., Newman, G., & Rips, L. J. (2005). Individuals and their concepts. In Ahn, Goldstone, Love, Markman, & Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the lab (pp. 127–149). Washington, D.C: APA.
Blok, S. V., Newman, G. E., & Rips, L. J. (2007). Out of sorts? Remedies for theories of object concepts: a reply to Rhemtulla and Xu,”. Psychological Review, 114, 1096–1102.
Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. London: Allen & Unwin.
Chen, H., Ng, S., & Rao, A. R. (2005). Cultural differences in consumer impatience. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 291–301.
Cohn, A., Fehr, E., Maréchal, M. A. (2013). A culture of cheating? Dishonesty and business culture in the banking industry, presentation at the 9th Invitational Choice Symposium, Noordwijk, Netherlands.
Cohn, A., Marechal, M.A., Noll T. (2014). How criminal identity affects rule violation, University of Zurich, mimeo
Ersner-Hershfield, H., Elliot Wimmer, G., & Knutson, B. (2009). Saving for the future self: neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 85–92.
Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: the influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.
Forehand, M. R., & Deshpandé, R. (2001). What we see makes us who we are: priming ethnic self-awareness and advertising response. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 336–348.
Frazier, B. N., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). Developmental changes in judgments of authentic objects. Cognitive Development, 24, 284–292.
Gao, L., Wheeler, S. C., & Shiv, B. (2009). The “shaken self”: product choices as a means of restoring self‐view confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 29–38.
Hood, B. M., & Bloom, P. (2008). Children prefer certain individuals over perfect duplicates. Cognition, 106, 455–462.
Kranton, R., Pease, M., Sanders, S. Huettel S. (2012) Identity, group conflict, and social preferences, mimeo, Duke University
Lenoir, A.-S., Puntoni, S., Reed, A., & Verlegh, P. (2013). The Impact of Cultural Symbols and Spokesperson Identity on Attitudes and Intentions”. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(4), 426–428.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299–337.
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). A context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
Mitchell, J. P., Schirmer, J., Ames, D. L., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). Medial prefrontal cortex predicts intertemporal choice. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1–10.
Newman, G. E., & Bloom, P. (2012). Art and authenticity: the importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 558–569.
Newman, G.E., Bartels, D.M., & Smith, R.K. (forthcoming). Are artworks more like people than artifacts? Individual concepts and their extensions, Topics in Cognitive Science.
Nichols, S., & Bruno, M. (2010). Intuitions about personal identity: an empirical study. Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 293–312.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Puntoni, S., Sweldens, S., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2011). Gender identity salience and perceived vulnerability to breast cancer. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 413–424.
Reed, A., II. (2004). Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: exploring identity salience effects on judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 286–295.
Reed, A., II, Aquino, K., Levy, E. M. F., Puntoni, S., & Warlop, L. (2012). Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 310–321.
Rios, K., Wheeler, S. C., & Miller, D. T. (2012). Compensatory nonconformity: self-uncertainty and low implicit self-esteem increase adoption and expression of minority opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1300–1309.
Rips, L. J. (2011). Lines of thought: central concepts in cognitive psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rips, L. J., Blok, S. V., & Newman, G. E. (2006). Tracing the identity of objects. Psychological Review, 113, 1–30.
Rozenkrants, B., Wheeler S. C., Shiv B. (2013). Identity cues in product rating distributions. Working paper
Sagi, E., & Rips, L. J. (2014). Identity, causality, and pronoun ambiguity. Topics in Cognitive Science, in press
Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Townsend, S. S. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: the case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 814.
Strominger, N. & Nichols S. (2013). The essential moral self, working paper
Tierney, H., Howard C., Kumar V., Kvaran T., Nichols S. (forthcoming). How many of us are there? In J. Sytsma (Ed.), Advances in experimental philosophy of mind. Continuum Press.
Turner, J. (1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
Wheeler, S. C., Petty, R. E., & Bizer, G. Y. (2005). Self‐schema matching and attitude change: situational and dispositional determinants of message elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 787–797.
Yang, A. & Urminsky O. (2014). The personal continuity heuristic: how anticipating future outcomes affects identity-relevant choices, working paper
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the additional session participants from the Department of Psychology, Northwestern University for their contributions and insights: Rachel Kranton, Michel Marechal, Shaun Nichols, Daniel Read, and Christian Wheeler
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Session at the 9th Triennial Choice Symposium
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Urminsky, O., Bartels, D.M., Giuliano, P. et al. Choice and self: how synchronic and diachronic identity shape choices and decision making. Mark Lett 25, 281–291 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9312-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9312-3