Skip to main content
Log in

The adoption of customer service improvement practices

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of 20 customer service improvement practices tests several hypotheses that explore the antecedents and consequences of customer service improvement practice adoption. Adoption was observed to coevolve with organization size and to be higher in firms that claim service excellence superiority and firms that face operating environments where service delivery is more uncertain. In the public service sector, where market winnowing and incentives are much lower, organizations adopted fewer service improvement practices. The diffusion penetration of service improvement practices in the health care, finance and banking, professional, and lodging and food service sectors was correlated with the extent to which service improvement practices explain service excellence in each sector. Imitation and learning is service sector specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Institutional theory (Meyer and Rowan 1977; Zucker 1987) claims another reason for imitation as follows: organizations copy each other to minimize sanctions from various stakeholders: “We were doing what everyone else was doing.”

  2. No claims are made about the 20 SIPs chosen to be studied other than that they are 20 illustrative examples of SIPs drawn from literature that recommends them as worthy of imitating/adopting.

  3. Winnowing occurs when organizations offering inferior service quality or inferior value for money are less preferred, sell fewer services, are unprofitable, and ultimately fail (are acquired, sell-up, or close their doors).

  4. For details, please Google ZoomPanel which is a TrueSample verified and ESOMAR compliant panel.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58(3), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L., Parasuraman, A., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1994). Improving service quality in America: lessons learned. Academy of Management Executive, 8(2), 32–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biolos, J. (2002). Six sigma meets the service economy. Harvard Management Update, 7(11), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tereault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1933). The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota, M. R., & Ronkainen, I. A. (2012). International marketing. Mason: South-Western Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. R. (2003). The pigeon breeders’ cup: a selection on selection theory of economic evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., & Marengo, L. (2007). On the evolutionary and behavioral theories of organizations: a tentative roadmap. Organization Science, 18(3), 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. M., & Freedman, R. D. (1985). External environment and internal strategies: calculating, experimenting and imitating in organizations. In Lamb, R. & Shrivastava, P. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, 3: Greenwich, CT: JAI, 39–67.

  • Fitzsimmons, J. A., & Fitzsimmons, M. J. (1995). Service management. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliess, S., & Kleinaltenkamp, M. (2004). Blueprinting the service company: managing service processes efficiently. Journal of Business Research, 57, 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchsberg, G. (1992). Quality programs show shoddy results. Wallstreet Journal, (May), p. B1.

  • Gronroos, S. (1985). Internal marketing: theory and practice. In T. M. Bloch (Ed.), Services marketing in a changing environment (pp. 41–47). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos, S. (1990). Service management and marketing. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). New studies in philosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas. London: Routledge and Kegan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hensel, J. S. (1990). Service quality improvement and control: a customer based approach. Journal of Business Research, 20(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingman-Brundage, J. (1989). Blueprinting for the bottom Line. In Service excellence: Marketing’s impact on performance. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metters, R., & Marucheck, A. (2007). Service management-academic issues and scholarly reflections from operations management researchers. Decision Sciences, 38(2), 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, V. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 440–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. (1993). Reinventing government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 16(4), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., & Burkhard, K. A. (2011). Leveraging service blueprinting to rethink higher education,.www.americanprogress.org, 19.

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: a comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestorius, M. S. (2007). “Apply Six Sigma to Sales and Marketing,” Quality Progress, January: www.asy.org, 19–24.

  • Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuing, E. E., & Christopher, W. F. (1993). The service quality handbook. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high-quality products as returns to reputations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 659–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In S. J. Latsis (Ed.), Method and appraisal in economics (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought, American Economic Association Richard T. Ely Lecture. (May), 1–16.

  • Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. W. (1998). “Recovering and Learning from service failure,” Sloan Management Review Fall, 75–88.

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R., & Woods, J. A. (Eds.). (1998). Best practices in customer service. Amherst: HRD Press, AMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Paul Miniard and Dr. Peter Magnusson of Florida International University are thanked for their many comments and suggestions on drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter R. Dickson.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Sample profile

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickson, P.R. The adoption of customer service improvement practices. Mark Lett 26, 1–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9263-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9263-0

Keywords

Navigation