Skip to main content
Log in

A pricing model for group-buying auction based on customers' waiting-time

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group-buying auction is a new business model in e-commerce. This auction has its own characteristics that make it distinct from other types of auctions. Customers' waiting time is an inherent attribute for group-buying auction. However, this attribute is rarely considered in the previous pricing models. Therefore, finding an appropriate pricing model for it seems to be of great importance. In this paper, with the help of game-theory concepts and according to each customer's waiting time in group-buying auction, a pricing model for a duopolistic market is proposed which takes into account both customers' and sellers' satisfaction. The pricing model shows that customers' awareness of Internet group-buying auction is so important and if it is lower than a boundary value, then the group-buying seller could not compete in the market. The model emphasizes on economies of scale as a significant factor in the success of the auction. The model also stresses the importance of gaining customers with lower product value in the group-buying auction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The P 1 + B.T g amount is the maximum amount of P 1 + B.T w for all customers. Considering this boundary amount, we can be assured of the purchasing of all the customers, even if the group-buying auction fails to reach to the second price

  2. Pricing models have implemented with MATLAB. Numerical examples are also added to appendix section, which is available from the authors.

References

  • Anand, S. K., & Aron, R. (2003). Group-buying on the web: a comparison of price discovery mechanisms. Management Science, 48(11), 1546–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancarani, F. (2002). Pricing and the Internet: frictionless commerce or pricer's paradise? European Management Journal, 20(6), 680–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breidert, C. (2006). Estimation of willingness-to-pay theory, measurement, application. New Mexico: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Chen, X., & Song, X. (2007). Comparison of the group-buying auction and the fixed pricing mechanism. Decision Support Systems, 43, 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Chen, X., Kauffman, R. J., & Song, X. (2009). Should we collude? Analyzing the benefits of bidder cooperation in online group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(4), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Kauffman, R. J., Liu, Y., & Song, X. (2010). Segmenting uncertain demand in group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(2), 126–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, S. H., & Kim, J. C. (2005). Pricing strategies in B2C electronic commerce: analytical and empirical approaches. Decision Support Systems, 40, 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, P., Liu, Z., Wynter, L., & Xia, C. (2007). Competitive equilibrium in e-commerce: pricing and outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research, 34, 3541–3559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, E., & Maxwell, S. (2010). Consumer response to norm-breaking pricing events in e-commerce. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1066–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R. J., & Wang, B. (2002). New buyers' arrival under dynamic pricing market microstructure: the case of group-buying discounts on the Internet. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 157–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R. J., Lai, H., & Ho, C. T. (2010a). Incentive mechanisms, fairness and participation in online group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R. J., Lai, H., & Lin, H.-C. (2010b). Consumer adoption of group-buying auctions: an experimental study. Information Technology and Management, 11(4), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopalle, P., Biswas, D., Chintagunta, P. K., Fan, J., Pauwels, K., Ratchford, B. T., et al. (2009). Retailer pricing and competitive effects. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. H., & Zhuang, T. Y. (2004). Comparing the performance of group-buying models with different incentive mechanisms. the Third Workshop on e- Business,. Washington, DC.

  • Lee, S., Illia, A., & Lawson-Body, A. (2011). Perceived price fairness of dynamic pricing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(4), 531–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., & Tang, F. F. (2011). Online pricing dynamics in Internet retailing: the case of the DVD market. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. M., Jhang-Li, J. H., Hwang, T. K., & Chen, P. W. (2010). Analysis of pricing strategies for community-based group buying: the impact of competition and waiting cost. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, T., & Holden, R. (2002). Strategy and tactics of pricing (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahyar Sharif Vaghefi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharif Vaghefi, M., Sharif Vaghefi, M. & Beheshti, N. A pricing model for group-buying auction based on customers' waiting-time. Mark Lett 25, 425–434 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9262-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9262-1

Keywords

Navigation