Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On performance of CryoSat-2 altimeter data in deriving marine gravity over the Bay of Bengal

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Marine Geophysical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CryoSat-2 was launched successfully in April 2010 and thus has long exceeded its design life, so it is necessary to assess the reliability of gravity anomalies derived from CryoSat-2 altimeter data beyond its nominal lifetime. CryoSat-2 altimeter data in four different periods is used to derive 1′ × 1′ gravity anomalies within the Bay of Bengal (BOB) and its adjoining areas (80°–100°E, 0°–23°N). The accuracies of gravity anomalies in different periods are assessed in comparison with processed ship-borne gravity anomalies, revealing that the gravity anomalies derived from CryoSat-2 altimetry data in different periods have similar accuracies. The amount of geodetic mission data acquired by the CryoSat-2 altimeter exceeds that recorded by all other altimeters. Thus, we determine the gravity anomalies within the BOB and adjoining areas by using data from January 2011 to May 2020 to evaluate the gravity anomaly derivation performance of all available CryoSat-2 altimeter data, and establish the 1′ × 1′ BOBGA1.0 marine gravity model. In this work, the performance of BOBGA1.0 at different distances from the coast and at different water depths is evaluated by comparisons with ship-borne gravity anomalies and the SIO V28.1 marine gravity model. The role of CryoSat-2 in deriving gravity anomalies is further assessed by a comparison with other satellite altimeters. We conclude that CryoSat-2 altimetry data can reliably be used to derive gravity anomalies and that high-resolution and high-accuracy CryoSat-2 altimetry data play a major role in gravity anomaly derivation worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Code availability

The code presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Alam M, Alam MM, Curray JR, Chowdhury MLR, Gani MR (2003) An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history. Sediment Geol 155(3–4):179–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen OB, Knudsen B, Berry PAM (2010) The DNSC08GRA global marine gravity field from double retracked satellite altimetry. J Geodesystem 84(3):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett D, Watts AB (2015) Gravity anomalies, crustal structure, and seismicity at subduction zones: 1. Seafloor roughness and subducting relief. Geochem Geophys Geosystem 16(5):1508–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett D, Watts AB (2015) Gravity anomalies, crustal structure, and seismicity at subduction zones: 2. Interrelationships be-tween fore-arc structure and seismogenic behavior. Geochem Geophy Geosystem 16(5):1541–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benahmed Daho SA (2010) Assessment of the EGM2008 gravity field in Algeria using gravity and GPS/levelling data. Int Assoc Geodesy Symp 135:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg C, Ebbing J (2009) New insights into the basement structure of the West Siberian Basin from forward and inverse modeling of GRACE satellite gravity data. J Geophys Res 114(B6):B06402

    Google Scholar 

  • Calafat FM, Cipollini P, Bouffard J, Snaith H, Féménias P (2017) Evaluation of new CryoSat-2 products over the ocean. Remote Sens Environ 191(15):131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmant S, Baudry N (1996) Modelling bathymetry by inverting satellite altimetry data: a review. Mar Geophys Res 18(2–4):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler MT, Wessel P (2008) Improving the quality of marine geophysical track line data: Along-track analysis. J Geophys Res 113(B2):B02102

    Google Scholar 

  • CNES (2020) Along-track level-2+ (L2p) SLA product handbook. SALP-MU-P-EA-23150-CLS, Issue2.0

  • Eppelbaum L, Katz Yu, Klokochnik J, Kosteletsky J, Zheludev V, Ben-Avraham Z (2018) Tectonic insights into the Arabian-African region inferred from a comprehensive examination of satellite gravity big data. Global Planet Change 171:65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhead JD (2015) Generating a high-resolution global gravity model for oil exploration: part 2—marine satellite altimeter-derived gravity. Lead Edge 34(3):566–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhead JD, Green CM, Odegard ME (2001) Satellite-derived gravity having an impact on marine exploration. Lead Edge 20(8):873–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu LL, Cheng B, Qiu B (2011) 25-day period large-scale oscillations in the Argentine Basin revealed by the TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter. J Phys Oceanogr 31(2):506–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia ES, Sandwell DT, Bassett D (2019) Outer trench slope flexure and faulting at pacific basin subduction zones. Geophys J Int 218(1):708–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Liu X, Chen Y, Wang J, Li C (2014) Local normal height connection across sea with ship-borne gravimetry and GNSS techniques. Mar Geophys Res 35(2):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Shen Y, Zhang K, Liu X, Kong Q, Xie F (2016) Temporal-spatial distribution of oceanic vertical deflections determined by TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1/2 missions. Earth Sci Res J 20:H1–H5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao YS, Hwang C, Cheng YS, Chen LC, Hsu HJ, Tsai JH, Liu CL, Wang CC, Liu YC, Kao YC (2016) High-resolution depth and coastline over major atolls of South China Sea from satellite altimetry and imagery. Remote Sens Environ 176:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C (1998) Inverse Vening Meinesz formula and deflection-geoid formula: applications to the predictions of gravity and geoid over the South China Sea. J Geodesy 72(5):304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C, Parsons B (1995) Gravity anomalies derived from Seasat, Geosat, ERS-1 and TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry and ship gravity: a case study over the Reykjanes Ridge. Geophys J Int 122(2):551–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C (2006) Precision free-inertial navigation with gravity compensation by an onboard gradiometer. J Guid Control Dynam 29(3):704–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klokočník J, Kostelecký J, Bezděk A, Cílek V, Peŝek I (2017) A support for the existence of paleolakes and paleorivers buried under Saharan sand by means of “gravitational signal” from EIGEN 6C4. Arab J Geosci 10(9):199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labroue S, Boy F, Picot N, Urvoy M, Ablain M (2012) First quality assessment of the CryoSat-2 altimetric system over ocean. Adv Space Res 50(8):1030–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Liu X, Guo J, Zhu C, Yuan J, Gao J, Gao Y, Ji B (2020) Performance of Jason-2/GM altimeter in deriving marine gravity with the waveform derivative retracking method: a case study in the South China Sea. Arab J Geosci 13:939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo K, Heki K (2010) Time-variable ice loss in Asian high mountains from satellite gravimetry. Earth Planet Sc Lett 290(1–2):30–36

  • Moritz H (1972) Advanced least-squares methods, vol 175. Ohio State University Research Foundation, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen V-S, Pham V-T, Nguyen LV, Andersen OB, Forsberg R, Bui DT (2020) Marine gravity anomaly mapping for the Gulf of Tonkin area (Vietnam) using CryoSat-2 and Saral/Altika satellite altimetry data. Adv Space Res 66(3):505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res-Solid Earth 117(B4):B04406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PowellCM RSR, Veevers JJ (1988) Pre-breakup continental extension in East Gondwanaland and the early opening of the eastern Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics 155(1–4):261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna M, Rao GS, Satyabrata N, Rastic B, Twinkle D (2012) Early cretaceous fracture zones in the Bay of Bengal and their tectonic implications: Constraints from multi-channel seismic reflection and potential field data. Tectonophysics 522–523:187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp RH (1979) Geos 3 data processing for the recovery of geoid undulations and gravity anomalies. J Geophys Res 84(B8):3784–3792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rio MH, Mulet S, Picot N (2014) Beyond GOCE for the ocean circulation estimate: Synergetic use of altimetry, gravimetry, and in situ data provides new insight into geostrophic and Ekman currents. Geophys Res Lett 41(24):8918–8925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer J-Y, Sandwell DT (1989) Evolution of the Eastern Indian Ocean since the late cretaceous: constraints from geosat altimetry. J Geophys Res 94(B10):13755–13782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (1997) Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS-1 satellite altimetry. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth 102(B2):10039–10054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (2009) Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS-1 altimetry: ridge segmentation versus spreading rate. J Geophys Res 114(B1):B01411

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell D, Garcia E, Soofi K, Wessel P, Chandler M, Smith WHF (2013) Toward 1-mGal accuracy in global marine gravity from CryoSat-2, Envisat, and Jason-1. Lead Edge 32:892–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell DT, Muller RD, Smith WH, Garcia E, Francis R (2014) Marine geophysics. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science 346(6205):65–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell DT, Harper H, Tozer B, Smith WHF (2019) Gravity field recovery from geodetic altimeter missions. Adv Space Res 68(C4):1059–1072

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider R, Tarpanelli A, Nielsen K, Madsen H, Bauer-Gottwein P (2018) Evaluation of multi-mode CryoSat-2 altimetry data over the Po River against in situ data and a hydrodynamic model. Adv Water Resour 112:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenseng L, Andersen OB (2012) Preliminary gravity recovery from CryoSat-2 data in the Baffin Bay. Adv Space Res 50(8):1158–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC, Rapp RH (1974) Closed covariance expressions for gravity anomalies, geoid undulations, and deflections of the vertical implied by anomaly degree variance models. Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Chandler MT (2007) The MGD77 supplement to the generic mapping tools. Comput Geosci 33(1):62–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YH (2016) Regional gravity field modeling from heterogeneous data sets by using Poisson wavelets radial basis functions. Ph.D. Thesis, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

  • Yuan J, Guo J, Zhu C, Hwang C, Yu D, Sun M, Mu D (2021) High-resolution sea level change around China seas revealed through multi-satellite altimeter data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 102:102433

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Mei L, Ma Y, Li R, Yin Y (2014) Tectonic features and dynamic evolution of Bay of Bengal Basin: new insights into satellite-gravity and seismic data. Earth Sci-J China Univ Geosci 39(10):1407–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Yang G, Wang J, Wen ZA (2018) Combined gravity compensation method for INS using the simplified gravity model and gravity database. Sensors 18(5):1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Guo J, Hwang C, Gao J, Yuan J, Liu X (2019) How HY-2A/GM altimeter performs in marine gravity derivation: assessment in the South China Sea. Geophys J Int 219(2):1056–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Guo J, Gao J, Liu X, Hwang C, Yu S, Yuan J, Ji B, Guan B (2020) Marine gravity determined from multi-satellite GM/ERM altimeter data over the South China Sea: SCSGA V1.0. J Geodesy 94:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Guo J, Yuan J, Jin X, Gao J, Li C (2021) Refining altimeter-derived gravity anomaly model from shipborne gravity by multi-layer perceptron neural network: a case in the South China Sea. Remote Sens 13(4):607

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are highly grateful to AVISO for providing the CryoSat-2 altimeter data, and NCEI for providing ship-borne gravity. We are also thankful to Professors Sandwell and Smith for the global marine gravity model V28.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41774001, 41874091), SDUST Research Fund (Grant No. 2014TDJH101), and Autonomous and Controllable Special Project for Surveying and Mapping of China (Grant No. 816-517).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, XL, BJ and JG; Data curation, CZ and JY; Funding acquisition, XL and JG; Investigation, HJ, XL, CZ and JY; Methodology, HJ and XL; Project administration, XL and JG; Resources, HJ and JY; Software, HJ, CZ and JY; Supervision, XL, BJ and JG.; Validation, CZ, YY and BJ; Writing—original draft, HJ.; Writing—review & editing, HJ, CZ and JG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Liu or Jinyun Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, H., Liu, X., Zhu, C. et al. On performance of CryoSat-2 altimeter data in deriving marine gravity over the Bay of Bengal. Mar Geophys Res 42, 39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-021-09461-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-021-09461-x

Keywords

Navigation