Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of executive cognitive characteristics on a firm’s ESG performance: an institutional theory perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current global landscape, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) serves as a vital metric for measuring the sustainable development level of listed companies. With respect to this matter, government departments and company managers have gradually taken notice of the company’s ESG performance. This paper proposed a theoretical model that integrates Scott’s institutional theory and the social embedding theory to evaluate the cognitive characteristics of top managers. Focusing on the period spanning from 2011 to 2020, an examination was conducted on the influence of executive cognitive characteristics on the ESG performance of enterprises under the moderating effect of local fiscal intervention. The empirical analysis results highlighted that executive compensation incentives, educational background, and political association had a promoting effect on the ESG performance of enterprises. Equally crucial, the greater the level of political correlation among executives, the less beneficial it is for the advancement of ESG performance among enterprises. Further research results underlined that local fiscal intervention had a negative moderating effect on the relationship between executive compensation incentives, educational levels, and political association levels on enterprise ESG performance, that is, in areas where there is a significant degree of local fiscal intervention. Ultimately, local fiscal intervention weakens the relationship between executive characteristics and ESG performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All materials were derived from the annual reports of listed companies, which were available on the websites of the respective companies. We are unable to share the raw and processed data needed for replicating these results at this moment, as it is currently being used in another ongoing project.

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albino-Pimentel, J., Anand, R., & Dussauge, P. (2018). How do firm political connections impact foreign acquisitions? The effects of decision makers’ political and firm embeddedness. Global Strategy Journal, 8(3), 421–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • And, S., & Thomas, J. M. (2014). Relating CEO compensation to Social Performance and Financial Performance: Does the measure of Compensation Matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(4).

  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2010). Pay without performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of executive compensation. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 59(4), 975–980.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., Logsdon, J. M., Mitchell, W., Reiner, M., & Vogel, D. (1986). Corporate community involvement in the San Francisco bay area. California Management Review, 28(3), 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan (2011). CVice. The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics(104), 159–173.

  • Campbell, K., Johnston, D., Sefcik, S. E., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2007). Executive compensation and non-financial risk: An empirical examination. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 26(4), 436–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., & Huang, J. (2007). Government intervention, diversification and firm performance. Management World, 1(92), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. M., Bu, M., Wu, S. B., & Liang, X. (2015). How does TMT attention to innovation of Chinese firms influence firm innovation activities? A study on the moderating role of corporate governance. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1127–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Shihua, L. W. (2011). Social Embedding in Corporate Governance:Theoretical Framework and Embedding mechanism. China Industrial Economics(06), 99–108.

  • Chizema, A., Liu, X. H., Lu, J. Y., & Gao, L. (2015). Politically connected boards and top executive pay in Chinese listed firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 890–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, M. J., & He, L. R. (2011). Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1158–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, S. J., Jia, C. X., Wu, Z. Y., & Zhang, X. Q. (2014). Executive political connections and firm performance: Comparative evidence from privately-controlled and state-owned enterprises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 36, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurosif, E. (2010). Remuneration Theme Report, 3rd in a Series. In: Paris.

  • Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gang, W. (2000). Incentives for top-management and performance of listed companies. Economic Research Journal.

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Song, X., & Wang, H. (2017). Informal system, hometown identity and corporate environmental governance. Management World, 3, 76–94, 187–188.

  • Jeppson, C. T., Smith, W. W., & Stone, R. S. (2009). CEO compensation and firm performance: Is there any relationship? Journal of Business & Economics Research, 7(11).

  • Keeble, J. J., Topiol, S., & Berkeley, S. (2003). Using indicators to measure sustainability performance at a corporate and Project Level. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do Lenders Favor politically connected firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, S., Li, Z., & Yang, Y. G. (2020). East, West, Home’s best: Do local CEOs behave less myopically? Accounting Review, 95(2), 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T., Liu, W. T., & Yu, J. X. (2021). Does TMT composition matter to environmental policy and firm performance? The role of organizational slack. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, (2017). Political linkages, Financial subsidies and Corporate Environmental performance. Accounting Communications, 18, 40–44.

  • Li, X., & F, Yiqiang. (2005). & Government Control, Institutional Environment and Firm Value: Evidence from The Chinese Securities Market. Economic Research Journal, 5, 40–51.

  • Li, D., & Jing, W. (2017). Top Management Team Heterogeneity,Government intervention and corporate social performance. Management Review, 29(12), 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Li, X., Zeng, H., & An, Y. (2017). Political connections, Auditor Choice and Corporate Accounting transparency:Evidence from private Sector firms in China. Accounting and Finance, 57(4), 1071–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., & Hu, J. (2014). The impact of the “Hometown” relationship between CEO and Director on the risk level of listed companies in China. Management World, 3, 131–138.

  • Luo, D., & Huang, N. (2008). Political relationship and firm value of private company. Journal of Management Sciences, 21(6), 21–28.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. S., & Thorn, L. (2006). An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations: John wiley & sons.

  • Masson, R. T. (1971). Executive motivations, earnings, and consequent equity performance. Journal of Political Economy, 79(6), 1278–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming, J., & Zhe, Z. (2010). Does political connection influence corporate philanthropy? Management World, 4, 99–113.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rizopoulos, Y. A., & Sergakis, D. E. (2010). Mnes and Policy networks: Institutional Embeddedness and Strategic Choice. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, natural and Open systems. Prentice Hall.

  • Shao, Y., Hernández, R., & Liu, P. (2015). Government intervention and corporate policies: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1205–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in Top Management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegarden, D. P., & Sheetz, S. D. (2003). Group cognitive mapping: A methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition. Omega, 31(2), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, L., Mahoney, L. S., Gregory, K., & Convery, S. (2017). A comparison of Canadian and US CSR strategic alliances, CSR reporting, and CSR performance: Insights into implicit–explicit CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, H., & Tian, G. (2022). Corporate sustainability and Trade Credit Financing: Evidence from Environmental, Social, and governance ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1896–1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. F., Li, H., & Fu-Sheng (2013). Political Connection, Government Intervention and Social Responsibility Information Disclosure. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University.

  • Wang, Z., Reimsbach, D., & Braam, G. (2018). Political embeddedness and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility practices in China: A Trade-Off between Financial and Csr Performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1185–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Luan, H., & &Zhang, X. Y.,S,P (2023). Corporate R&D investment, Esg Performance and Market Value-the moderating effect of corporate digitalization level. Research in Science, 41(05), 896–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, H. W., & Lee, C. C. (2020). Impact of fiscal decentralization on Firm Environmental performance: Evidence from a County-Level Fiscal Reform in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(29), 36147–36159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J., Farooq, U., Tabash, M. I., Refae, E., Ahmed, G. A., J., & Subhani, B. H. (2021). Government Green Environmental Concerns and corporate real investment decisions: Does Financial Sector Development Matter? Energy Policy, 158.

  • Xie, Q. (2017). Firm age, marketization, and Entry Mode choices of Emerging Economy firms: Evidence from listed firms in China. Journal of World Business, 52, 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y. (2021). Regulation, norms and Cultural Cognition: The Status Quo and countermeasures of Beautiful Rural Environmental Governance under the threshold of New Institutionalism: A Case Study of A Village. Shanxi Nongjing, 21, 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., & Wang, D. N. (2014). The impacts of Top Management Team characteristics on Entrepreneurial Strategic Orientation the Moderating effects of Industrial Environment and Corporate Ownership. Management Decision, 52(2), 378–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, Y., Yang, N., & &Zhang, C. (2011). Influence of the Top Management Team Heterogeneity and the firm Performance——To focus on Ownership Concentration. Management Review

  • Zell, D., & Kurland, N. (2010). An Executive’s primer on the strategy of Social Networks. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 563–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, P. (2012). Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Political Connections and Enterprises’ Performance. Chinese Journal of Management.

  • Zhang, Z. (2021). Legitimacy construction: The Strategic mechanism of Party Building Leading the Development of Urban Community Owners’ organizations: A case study of the Innovation of Party Building of the National Urban Grassroots Red Industry Committee. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 42(02), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the correlation between Senior Management Incentives and the operating performance of listed companies. Accounting Research, 09, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Huang, J., & Accountancy, S. O. (2015). Political connection,Venture Capital and Firm Performance. Nankai Business Review.

  • Zhang, Y. H., Baoshan, B. O., & University, S. O. (2016). Research on the impact of executive compensation incentive on corporate performance. On Economic Problems.

Download references

Funding

1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72374197, 71874186, 71974190), 2. The Key Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 2018SJZDI084), 3. Jiangsu Social Science Fund Base Project (No.19JD010), 4. Major Projects of the National Society Fund (22&ZD137), 5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2023SKHQ03, 2023-00126).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Manzhi Liu, Jia Lu, Qiyao Liu, Hui Wang, Yaxin Yang & Shuting Fang

  2. Big Data Marketing and Green Innovation Research Center, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Manzhi Liu

Authors
  1. Manzhi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qiyao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yaxin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shuting Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manzhi Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicting interests

It is hereby declared by the authors that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have potentially influenced the findings presented in this document.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Lu, J., Liu, Q. et al. The impact of executive cognitive characteristics on a firm’s ESG performance: an institutional theory perspective. J Manag Gov (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-024-09695-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-024-09695-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation