Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated reporting: an exploratory study of French companies

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing complexity of the business world has led to growing demands for companies to provide information about their financial performance, their corporate governance and their contribution to developing sustainability. In addition, there are increasing needs for investors to obtain more information about the value creation process since financial reporting systems account imperfectly for most of intangible assets generated by companies. In this context, this article aims to determine if integrated reporting does effectively achieve the objective of reducing the information asymmetry. To answer this research question, a qualitative content analysis was conducted of the IR disclosed by the French companies in the period of 2013–16. The study reveals that information asymmetry is not reduced since companies mention only some capitals as inputs to their value creation process while almost entirely excluding natural capital. Moreover, companies disclose only positive information mainly about their financial capital, without mentioning any destruction of capital, especially not the natural one. Finally, from our findings, signals disclosed by these companies can be classified in three categories: intent signals composed of information about social and relational capital; camouflage signals composed of information about the reduction of the pollution without mentioning the pollution itself and need signals composed of information about dividends encouraging investors to maintain their financial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C. A. (2015). The International Integrated Reporting Council: A call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27(March), 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, C., & Redigolo, G. (2016). Business model inIPO prospectuses: Insights from Italian Innovation Companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(2), 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, S., & Verrecchia, R. (1996). The relation among capital markets, financial disclosure, production efficiency, and insider trading. Journal of Accounting Spring(1), 1–22.

  • Barth, M. E. (2015). Financial accounting research, practices, and financial accountability. Abacus, 51(4), 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V., & Smith, S. J. (2013). Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital. British Accounting Review, 45(4), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., & Moscarola, J. (2000). Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide: The lexical approach to textual data analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: on the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauvey, J.-N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C., & Patten, D. M. (2015). The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L. L., Holder-Webb, L. N., & Wood, D. J. (2012). Corporate reporting on non-financial leading indicators of economic performance and Sustainability. Accounting Horizons, 26(1), 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assesment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, A., Adams, C., Nugent, M., & Haynes, K. (2015). Exploring metaphors of capitals and the framing of multiple capitals: challenges and opportunities for IR. Sustainability Accounting, Management & Policy Journal, 6(3), 290–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, C., Harre, R., & Tagg, C. (2002). Qualitative research and computing: methodological issues and practices in using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R., Van der Perk, J., Chiesura, A., & Van Vliet, A. (2003). Importance and threats as determining factors for criticality of natural capital. Ecological Economics, 44(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps, and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, C., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). Where firms choose to disclose voluntary environmental information. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(6), 504–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, C., Venter, E., & Hsiao, P. (2017). Integrated reporting: Background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future research. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), 937–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, A., & Kretschmer, M. (2007). Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial economy: A review and critique. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum 4à(3), 166-185.

  • Eccles, R. G., & Krus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., & De Groot, R. (2003). A Framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44(2–3), 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F. (2005). Capital substituability and weak sustainability revisited: The conditions for capital substitution in the presence of risk. Environmental Values, 14(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27(March), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2014). Explanatory factors of integrated sustainability and financial reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1/3), 3–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012). Reflections and projections: A decade of intellectual capital accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFAC. (2013). Enhancing Organisational Reporting. In I. F. o. Accountants (Ed.).

  • IIRC. (2011). Towards integrated reporting communication value in the 21st century. Available at: http://www.theiirc/international-ir-framework.

  • IIRC. (2013). The International <IR> Framework. Available at: http://www.theiirc.org/international-ir-framework.

  • IIRC. (2017a). Creating value - the value of human capital reporting. Available at: http://www.integratedreporting.org.

  • IIRC. (2017b). The cyclical power of integrated thinking and reporting Available at: http://www.integratedreporting.org.

  • Jensen, J. C., & Berg, N. (2012). Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. An institutionalist approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(5), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Roberts, L. (2013). Integrate, doing business in the 21st Century. South Africa: Claremont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2012). Integrated reporting: performance insight through better business reporting. In I. 2 (Ed.), Integrated Reporting, Vol. 2: KPMG.

  • Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassini, U., Lionzo, A., & Rossignoli, F. (2016). Does business model affect accounting choice? An empirical analysis of European listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(2), 229–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software for qualitative data analysis: A step-by-step guide. CA: Thousand Oaks.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melloni, G., Stacchezzini, R., & Lai, A. (2016). The tone of business model disclosure: An impression management analysis of integrated reports. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(2), 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining & measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, K., Paper, D., & Marx, S. (2012). Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistoni, A., Songini, L., & Perrone, O. (2016). The how and why of a firm’s approach to CSR and sustainability: A case study of a large European company. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 655–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S. (2003). Accounting for intangible assets: Current requirements, key players and future directions. European Accounting Review, 12(4), 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucci, T., Simoni, C., & Zanni, L. (2015). Measuring the relationship between assets, intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(3), 589–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L., & Richards, T. (1991). The Transformation of Qualitative Method: Computational Paradigms and Research Processes. In N. G. a. L. Fielding, R.M (Eds), (Ed.), Using Computers in Qualititative Research: 38–53. London: Sage.

  • Robertson, F. A., & Samy, M. (2015). Factors affecting the diffusion of integrated reporting—a UK FTS 100 perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management & Policy Journal, 6(2), 190–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, S., Lin, B., & Jeffers, A. (2014). An overview of sustainability reporting practices. CPA Journal, 84(3), 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 81(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, R., & Huggins, A. L. (2015). Integrated reporting and assurance: where can research add value? Sustainability Accounting, Management & Policy Journal, 6(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in restrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). The contributions of the economics of information to twenthieth century economics. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2018). Stakeholders’ perspectives on the role of regulatory reform in integrated reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. (2015). ‘But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report’ a commentary on ‘The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure’ by Flower. Journal Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27(March), 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, J. C. (2010). Externality or Sustainability Economics? Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2047–2052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B. (2004). Intangible resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(2), 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis newbury park. CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3(2), Art 26.

  • Wyatt, A. (2008). What financial and non-financial information on intangibles is value-relevant? A review of evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 38(3), 217–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbini, F. (2017). CSR Initiatives as market signals: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IAE-Sorbonne Business School, 8 bis rue de la Croix Jarry, 75013, Paris, France

    Elisabeth Albertini

Authors
  1. Elisabeth Albertini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Albertini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author Elisabeth Albertini declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table 2 in Appendix A.

Table 2 Coding framework
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albertini, E. Integrated reporting: an exploratory study of French companies. J Manag Gov 23, 513–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9428-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9428-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation