Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 525–556 | Cite as

With a view to make things better: individual characteristics and intentions to engage in management innovation

Article

Abstract

Management innovations increasingly attract interest from both scholars and practitioners. However, few writers have studied the role of individuals in inventing and implementing management innovations. In particular, little is known about individual-level factors that can be put under scrutiny in personnel recruitment processes and which can be expected to drive individuals’ intention to engage in recognizing and championing opportunities for management innovations. We develop a set of hypotheses on the role of individuals’ needs for achievement, needs for power, and attitudes to change and risk in determining their intention to engage in management innovation behavior and put these hypotheses under empirical scrutiny.

Keywords

Management innovation Need for achievement Need for power Attitudes Personnel selection 

References

  1. Abernathy, M. A., & Bouwens, J. (2005). Determinants of accounting innovation implementation. ABACUS, 41, 217–240.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16, 586–612.Google Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1993). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (2nd printing). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Stony Stratford, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104.Google Scholar
  7. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  8. Åmo, B. W. (2006). What motivates knowledge workers to involve themselves in employee innovation behaviour? International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 1, 160–177.Google Scholar
  9. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2004). Social psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Ax, C., & Bjørnenak, T. (2005). Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations—The case of the balanced scorecard in Sweden. Management Accounting Research, 16, 1–20.Google Scholar
  11. Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.Google Scholar
  12. Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 675–698.Google Scholar
  13. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.Google Scholar
  14. Benders, J., & van Veen, K. (2001). What’s in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organization, 8, 33–53.Google Scholar
  15. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 825–845.Google Scholar
  16. Bougen, P. D. (1989). The emergence, roles and consequences of an accounting-industrial relations interaction. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(3), 203–234.Google Scholar
  17. Bower, J. L. (1970). Managing the resource allocation process. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Strategy from an individual perspective. European Management Journal, 18, 207–215.Google Scholar
  19. Burgelman, R. (1983). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Science, 29, 1349–1364.Google Scholar
  20. Burgelman, R., & Grove, A. S. (2005). Strategic dynamics: Concepts and cases. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Burns, J., & Scapens, R. W. (2000). Conceptualizing management accounting change: An institutional framework. Management Accounting Research, 11, 3–25.Google Scholar
  22. Burns, J., & Vaivio, J. (2001). Management accounting change. Management Accounting Research, 12, 389–402.Google Scholar
  23. Burns, L. R., & Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational network. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 106–138.Google Scholar
  24. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Chenhall, R. H., & Euske, K. J. (2007). the role of management control systems in planned organizational change: An analysis of two organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 601–637.Google Scholar
  26. Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Performance measurement and reward systems, trust, and strategic change. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15, 117–143.Google Scholar
  27. Clarke, M., & Meldrum, M. (1998). Creating change from below: Early lessons from agents of change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20, 70–80.Google Scholar
  28. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA/London, U.K.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Colquitt, J. A. (2008). From the editors. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 616–620.Google Scholar
  31. Crawford, E. L., Luka, B., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2002). Social behavior. In H. Pashler & R. Gallistel (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 373–799). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13, 675–688.Google Scholar
  33. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590.Google Scholar
  34. Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 495–522.Google Scholar
  35. De Jong, J. P. J., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinants of co-workers innovative behavior: An investigation into knowledge intensive services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 189–212.Google Scholar
  36. De Waal, A., & Hermkens-Janssen, M. (2007). To change or not to change the budgeting process … that’s a tough question. In Paper presented at the EURAM conference, Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2008). The management of technological innovation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neil, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 716–736.Google Scholar
  39. Eifler, S. (2007). Evaluating the validity of self-reported deviant behavior using vignette analyses. Quality & Quantity, 41, 303–318.Google Scholar
  40. Elsbach, K. D., & Elofson, G. (2000). How the packaging of decision explanations affects perceptions of trustworthiness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 80–89.Google Scholar
  41. Ezzamel, M., Willmott, H., & Worthington, F. (2004). Accounting and management–labour relations: The politics of production in the factory with a problem. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 269–302.Google Scholar
  42. Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3, 441–455.Google Scholar
  43. Felin, T., & Hesterly, W. S. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32, 195–218.Google Scholar
  44. Fichter, K. (2009). Innovation communities: The role of networks of promotors in open innovation. R&D Management, 39(4), 357–371.Google Scholar
  45. Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 455–482.Google Scholar
  46. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2010). Entrepreneurial alertness and opportunity discovery: Origins, attributes, critique. In H. Landström & F. Lohrke (Eds.), Historical foundations of entrepreneurship research. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  47. Foss, N. J., Pedersen, T., Pyndt, J., & Schultz, M. (2012). Innovating organization & management. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Foster, B. P., & Ward, T. J. (1994). Theory of perpetual management accounting innovation lag in hierarchical organizations. Accounting, Organization and Society, 19, 401–411.Google Scholar
  49. French, J. R. P, Jr, & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  50. Frohman, A. L. (1997). Igniting organizational change from below: The power of personal initiative. Organizational Dynamics, 25, 39–53.Google Scholar
  51. Gebauer, H. (2011). Exploring the contribution of management innovation to the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1238–1250.Google Scholar
  52. Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(February), 72–84.Google Scholar
  53. Harder, M. (2011). Internal determinants of product innovation and management innovation: The effect of diagnostic capability and implementation capability. Working Paper, CBS, Denmark.Google Scholar
  54. Harrison, G., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2007). Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: A field experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109, 341–368.Google Scholar
  55. Hauschildt, J., & Kirchmann, E. (2001). Teamwork for innovation—The ‘Troika’ of promotors. R&D Management, 31, 41–49.Google Scholar
  56. Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007a). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 232–255.Google Scholar
  57. Holt, D. T., Rutherford, M. W., & Clohessy, G. R. (2007b). Corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical look at individual characteristics, context, and process. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 40–54.Google Scholar
  58. Howell, J. M. (2005). The right stuff: Identifying and developing effective champions of innovation. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 108–119.Google Scholar
  59. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317–341.Google Scholar
  60. Howell, J. M., Shea, C. M., & Higgins, C. A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: Defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 641–661.Google Scholar
  61. Hull, F., & Hage, J. (1982). Organizing for innovation: Beyond burns and stalker’s organic type. Sociology, 16, 564–577.Google Scholar
  62. Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Kapteyn, A., & Teppa, F. (2002). Subjective measures of risk aversion and portfolio choice. RAND Working Paper Series and Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  65. Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689–713.Google Scholar
  66. King, G., Murray, C. J. L., Salomon, J. A., & Tandon, A. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98, 191–207.Google Scholar
  67. Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 284–296.Google Scholar
  68. Kotter, J. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(March–April), 59–67.Google Scholar
  69. Kunz, J., & Linder, S. (2012). Organizational control and work effort—Another look at the interplay of rewards and motivation. European Accounting Review, 21(3), 591–621.Google Scholar
  70. Lehman, W. E. K., Greener, J. M., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 197–209.Google Scholar
  71. Linder, S. (2010). Studying micro-level phenomena in strategic management: How ecologically valid are findings from vignette experiments? In 30th annual conference of the Strategic Management Society, Rome.Google Scholar
  72. Lonti, Z. (2005). How much decentralization? Managerial autonomy in the Canadian public service. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 122–126.Google Scholar
  73. Malmi, T. (1999). Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: An exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 649–672.Google Scholar
  74. McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York, NY and Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  76. McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (2003). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 81(January), 117–126.Google Scholar
  77. Meeus, M., & Edquist, C. (2006). Introduction to part I. In J. Hage & M. Meeus (Eds.), Innovation, science, and institutional change (pp. 1–37). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Miner, J. B., & Dachler, H. P. (1973). Personnel attitudes and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 24, 379–402.Google Scholar
  79. Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1269–1280.Google Scholar
  80. Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirable response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131–149.Google Scholar
  81. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419.Google Scholar
  82. Naranjo-Gil, D., Maas, V. S., & Hartmann, F. G. H. (2009). How CFOs determine management accounting innovation: An examination of direct and indirect effects. European Accounting Review, 18, 667–695.Google Scholar
  83. Nickel, S., Nicolitsas, D., & Patterson, M. (2001). Does doing badly encourage management innovation? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 5–28.Google Scholar
  84. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.Google Scholar
  85. Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 680–693.Google Scholar
  86. Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11, 538–550.Google Scholar
  87. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.Google Scholar
  88. Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25, 783–794.Google Scholar
  89. Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology, 53, 518–528.Google Scholar
  90. Rosner, M. M. (1968). Economic determinants of organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 614–625.Google Scholar
  91. Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 15–67). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  92. Sauermann, H., & Cohen, W. M. (2010). What makes them tick: Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Science, 56, 2134–2153.Google Scholar
  93. Schiffenbauer, A. (1974). Effects of observer’s emotional state on judgements of the emotional state of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 31–35.Google Scholar
  94. Schmalt, H.-D., & Heckhausen, H. (2010). Machtmotivation. In: J. Heckhausen, & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und Handeln (4th edn., pp. 211–236). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  95. Schon, D. A. (1963). Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Business Review, 41, 77–86.Google Scholar
  96. Scott, S., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.Google Scholar
  97. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). the effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.Google Scholar
  98. Shane, S. (1995). Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 47–68.Google Scholar
  99. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.Google Scholar
  100. Staw, B. M., & Epstein, L. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 523–556.Google Scholar
  101. Steers, R. M., & Braunstein, D. N. (1976). A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 251–266.Google Scholar
  102. Stjernberg, T., & Philips, Å. (1993). Organizational innovations in a long-term perspective: Legitimacy and souls-of-fire as critical factors of change and viability. Human Relations, 46, 1193–1219.Google Scholar
  103. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.Google Scholar
  104. Strebel, P. (1996). Why do employees resist change? Harvard Business Review, 74 (May–June), 86–92.Google Scholar
  105. Teece, D. J. (1980). The diffusion of an administrative innovation. Management Science, 26, 464–470.Google Scholar
  106. Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial & Corporate Change, 3, 537–556.Google Scholar
  107. Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 1–20.Google Scholar
  108. Triandis, H. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks & Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
  109. Vaccaro, I. G., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organization size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28–51.Google Scholar
  110. Vithessonthi, C., & Schwaninger, M. (2008). Job motivation and self-confidence for learning and development as predictors of support for change. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 5, 141–157.Google Scholar
  111. Wallander, L. (2009). Twenty-five years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research, 38, 505–520.Google Scholar
  112. Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector—Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 387–412.Google Scholar
  113. Witte, E. (1977). Power and innovation: A two-center theory. International Studies of Management and Organization, 7, 47–70.Google Scholar
  114. Yamaguchi, I. (2003). The relationships among individual differences, needs and equity sensitivity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 324–344.Google Scholar
  115. Zbaracki, M. J. (1998). The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 602–638.Google Scholar
  116. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESSEC Business SchoolParisFrance
  2. 2.Goethe-UniversityFrankfurt/MainGermany

Personalised recommendations